@article{doi:10.1139/facets-2016-0015, author = {Wilson, Matthew J. and Ramey, Tonya L. and Donaldson, Michael R. and Germain, Ryan R. and Perkin, Elizabeth K.}, title = {Communicating science: Sending the right message to the right audience}, journal = {FACETS}, volume = {1}, number = {}, pages = {127-137}, year = {2017}, doi = {10.1139/facets-2016-0015}, URL = { https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2016-0015 }, eprint = { https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2016-0015 } , abstract = { For science communication to be effective, scientists must understand which sources of information their target audiences most frequently use and trust. We surveyed academic and non-academic scientists, natural resource managers, policymakers, students, and the general public about how they access, trust, and communicate scientific information. We found trust and use of information sources was related to participant age and group identity, but all groups had high levels of use and trust of personal experience and colleagues. Academic journals were the most trusted source by all groups, and social media the least trusted by most groups. The level of communication between target groups was not always bilateral, with the public generally perceiving their interaction with all other groups as low. These results provide remarkable insight into the flow of scientific information. We present these findings in the context of facilitating information flow between scientists and other stakeholders of scientific information. } } @article {, author = {Bickford D}, author = {Posa MRC}, author = {Qie L}, author = {Campos-Arceiz A}, author = {Kudavidanage EP}, title = {Science communication for biodiversity conservation}, journal = {Biological Conservation}, volume = {151}, pages = {74}, year = {2012} } @article {, author = {Bik HM}, author = {Dove AD}, author = {Goldstein MC}, author = {Helm RR}, author = {MacPherson R}, author = {Martini K}, title = {Ten simple rules for effective online outreach}, journal = {PLoS Computational Biology}, volume = {11}, pages = {e1003906}, year = {2015} } @article {, author = {Björk BC}, author = {Solomon D}, title = {Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact}, journal = {BMC Medicine}, volume = {10}, pages = {1}, year = {2012} } @article {, author = {Bombaci SP}, author = {Farr CM}, author = {Gallo HT}, author = {Mangan AM}, author = {Stinson LT}, author = {Kaushik M}, title = {Using Twitter to communicate conservation science from a professional conference}, journal = {Conservation Biology}, volume = {30}, pages = {216}, year = {2016} } @article {, author = {Darling ES}, author = {Shiffman D}, author = {Côté IM}, author = {Drew JA}, title = {The role of Twitter in the life cycle of a scientific publication}, journal = {Ideas in Ecology and Evolution}, volume = {6}, pages = {32}, year = {2013} } @article {, author = {Denscombe M}, title = {Web-based questionnaires and the mode effect: an evaluation based on completion rates and data contents of near-identical questionnaires delivered in different modes}, journal = {Social Science Computer Review}, volume = {24}, pages = {246}, year = {2006} } @article {, author = {Dickinson JL}, author = {Shirk J}, author = {Bonter D}, author = {Bonney R}, author = {Crain RL}, author = {Martin J}, title = {The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement}, journal = {Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment}, volume = {10}, pages = {291}, year = {2012} } @article {, author = {Dietz T}, title = {Bringing values and deliberation to science communication}, journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences}, volume = {110}, pages = {14081}, year = {2013} } @article {, author = {Fischhoff B}, title = {The sciences of science communication}, journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences}, volume = {110}, pages = {14033}, year = {2013} } @article {, author = {Harris JK}, author = {Allen P}, author = {Jacob RR}, author = {Elliott L}, author = {Brownson RC}, title = {Information-seeking among chronic disease prevention staff in state health departments: use of academic journals}, journal = {Preventing Chronic Disease}, volume = {11}, pages = {E138}, year = {2014} } @article {, author = {Hayes DP}, title = {The growing inaccessibility of science}, journal = {Nature}, volume = {356}, pages = {739}, year = {1992} } @article {, author = {Jordan RC}, author = {Gray SA}, author = {Howe DV}, author = {Brooks WR}, author = {Ehrenfeld JG}, title = {Knowledge gain and behavioral change in citizen-science programs}, journal = {Conservation Biology}, volume = {25}, pages = {1148}, year = {2011} } @article {, author = {Kohring M}, author = {Matthes J}, title = {Trust in news media: development and validation of a multidimensional scale}, journal = {Communication Research}, volume = {34}, pages = {231}, year = {2007} } @article {, author = {Kolb AY}, author = {Kolb DA}, title = {The learning way: meta-cognitive aspects of experiential learning}, journal = {Simulation \& Gaming}, volume = {40}, pages = {297}, year = {2009} } @article {, author = {Kuehne LM}, author = {Olden JD}, title = {Opinion: lay summaries needed to enhance science communication}, journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences}, volume = {112}, pages = {3585}, year = {2015} } @article {, author = {Kuehne LM}, author = {Twardochleb LA}, author = {Fritschie KJ}, author = {Mims MC}, author = {Lawrence DJ}, author = {Gibson PP}, title = {Practical science communication strategies for graduate students}, journal = {Conservation Biology}, volume = {28}, pages = {1225}, year = {2014} } @article {, author = {Land-Zandstra AM}, author = {Devilee JLA}, author = {Snik F}, author = {Buurmeijer F}, author = {van den Broek JM}, title = {Citizen science on a smartphone: participants’ motivations and learning}, journal = {Public Understanding of Science}, volume = {25}, pages = {45}, year = {2016} } @article {, author = {McClain C}, author = {Neeley L}, title = {A critical evaluation of science outreach via social media: its role and impact on scientists}, journal = {F1000Research}, volume = {3}, pages = {300}, year = {2014} } @article {, author = {Miller S}, title = {Public understanding of science and the crossroads}, journal = {Public Understanding of Science}, volume = {10}, pages = {115}, year = {2001} } @article {, author = {Neylon C}, author = {Wu S}, title = {Article-level metrics and the evolution of scientific impact}, journal = {PLoS Biology}, volume = {7}, pages = {e1000242}, year = {2009} } @article {, author = {Nisbet MC}, author = {Scheufele DA}, title = {What’s next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions}, journal = {American Journal of Botany}, volume = {96}, pages = {1767}, year = {2009} } @article {, author = {Rands MR}, author = {Adams WM}, author = {Bennun L}, author = {Butchart SH}, author = {Clements A}, author = {Coomes D}, title = {Biodiversity conservation: challenges beyond 2010}, journal = {Science}, volume = {329}, pages = {1298}, year = {2010} } @article {, author = {Singh GG}, author = {Tam J}, author = {Sisk TD}, author = {Klain SC}, author = {Mach ME}, author = {Martone RG}, title = {A more social science: barriers and incentives for scientists engaging in policy}, journal = {Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment}, volume = {12}, pages = {161}, year = {2014} } @article {, author = {Varner J}, title = {Scientific outreach: toward effective public engagement with biological science}, journal = {BioScience}, volume = {64}, pages = {333}, year = {2014} } @article {, author = {Yun GW}, author = {Trumbo CW}, title = {Comparative response to a survey executed by post, e-mail, and web form}, journal = {Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication}, volume = {6}, pages = {}, year = {2000} }