@article{doi:10.1139/facets-2017-0024, author = {Chaumont, Andréanne and Foster, Angel M.}, title = {The not so over-the-counter status of emergency contraception in Ontario: A mixed methods study with pharmacists}, journal = {FACETS}, volume = {2}, number = {}, pages = {429-439}, year = {2017}, doi = {10.1139/facets-2017-0024}, URL = { https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2017-0024 }, eprint = { https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2017-0024 } , abstract = { Introduction: In Canada, the progestin-only dedicated pill is the most widely used method of emergency contraception (EC). This method gained over-the-counter status in Ontario in 2008. Our mixed methods study explored the progestin-only EC knowledge, attitudes, and provision practices of Ontario pharmacists. Methods: From June 2015 to October 2015, we collected 198 mailed surveys from Ontarian pharmacy representatives and conducted 17 in-depth interviews with a subset of respondents. We analyzed these data using descriptive statistics and for content and themes. Results: Results from our English/French bilingual survey indicate that respondents’ knowledge is generally accurate, but confusion persists about the mechanism of action and the number of times the drug can be used in one menstrual cycle. Nearly half (49\%) of our survey respondents indicated that progestin-only EC pills are only available behind the counter. Interviewees strongly supported the introduction and promotion of more effective methods of EC in Ontario. Conclusion: Continuing education focusing on both the regulatory status of progestin-only EC and information about the medication appears warranted. Health Canada’s recent approval of ulipristal acetate for use as a post-coital contraceptive may provide a window of opportunity for engaging with health service providers, including pharmacists, about all available modalities of EC in Canada. } } @article {, author = {Black A}, author = {Guilbert E}, title = {Canadian contraception consensus (part 1 of 4)}, journal = {Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada}, volume = {37}, pages = {936}, year = {2015} } @article {, author = { }, title = {Emergency contraception moves behind the counter}, journal = {Canadian Medical Association Journal}, volume = {172}, pages = {845}, year = {2005} } @article {, author = {Cohen MM}, author = {Dunn S}, author = {Cockerill R}, author = {Brown TER}, title = {Emergency contraception: models to increase accessibility}, journal = {Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada}, volume = {25}, pages = {499}, year = {2003} } @article {, author = {Dunn S}, author = {Brown TER}, author = {Alldred J}, title = {Availability of emergency contraception after its deregulation from prescription-only status: a survey of Ontario pharmacies}, journal = {Canadian Medical Association Journal}, volume = {178}, pages = {423}, year = {2008} } @article {, author = {Eggertson L}, title = {Plan B comes out from behind the counter}, journal = {Canadian Medical Association Journal}, volume = {178}, pages = {1645}, year = {2008} } @article {, author = {Eggertson L}, title = {Plan B emergency contraception may be ineffective for heavier women}, journal = {Canadian Medical Association Journal}, volume = {186}, pages = {E21}, year = {2014} } @article {, author = {Eggertson L}, author = {Sibbald B}, title = {Privacy issues raised over Plan B: women asked for names, addresses, sexual history}, journal = {Canadian Medical Association Journal}, volume = {173}, pages = {1435}, year = {2005} } @article {, author = {Gemzell-Danielsson K}, author = {Kardos L}, author = {von Hertzen H}, title = {Impact of bodyweight/body mass index on the effectiveness of emergency contraception with levonorgestrel: a pooled-analysis of three randomized controlled trials}, journal = {Current Medical Research and Opinion}, volume = {31}, pages = {2241}, year = {2015} } @article {, author = {Glasier A}, author = {Cameron ST}, author = {Blithe D}, author = {Scherrer B}, author = {Mathe H}, author = {Levy D}, title = {Can we identify women at risk of pregnancy despite using contraception? Data from randomized trials of ulipristal acetate and levonorgestrel}, journal = {Contraception}, volume = {84}, pages = {363}, year = {2011} } @article {, author = {Kapp N}, author = {Abitbol JL}, author = {Mathé H}, author = {Scherrer B}, author = {Guillard H}, author = {Gainer E}, title = {Effect of body weight and BMI on the efficacy of levonorgestrel emergency contraception}, journal = {Contraception}, volume = {91}, pages = {91}, year = {2015} } @article {, author = {Raymond EG}, author = {Creinin MD}, author = {Barnhart KT}, author = {Loworn AE}, author = {Rountree RW}, author = {Trussell J}, title = {Meclizine for prevention of nausea associated with emergency contraceptive pills: a randomized trial}, journal = {Obstetrics \& Gynecology}, volume = {95}, pages = {271}, year = {2000} } @article {, author = {Soon JA}, author = {Levine M}, author = {Osmond BL}, author = {Ensom MHH}, author = {Fielding DW}, title = {Effects of making emergency contraception available without a physician’s prescription: a population-based study}, journal = {Canadian Medical Association Journal}, volume = {172}, pages = {878}, year = {2005} } @article {, author = {Wynn LL}, author = {Erdman JN}, author = {Foster AM}, author = {Trussell J}, title = {Harm reduction or women’s rights? Debates over access to emergency contraceptive pills in Canada and the US}, journal = {Studies in Family Planning}, volume = {38}, pages = {253}, year = {2007} }