CLOSE
Advanced searchCitation search
Suggested Terms:
Skip main navigation

Search Result

1 - 4of4
per page:
Relevance
Filters

You do not have any saved searches

  • OPEN ACCESS
    Opposing trends in fisheries portfolio diversity at harvester and community scales signal opportunities for adaptation
    FACETS • Vol. 7 • pp. 1385 - 1410
    Understanding mechanisms that promote social-ecological resilience can inform future adaptation strategies. Among seafood dependent communities, these can be illuminated by assessing change among fisheries portfolios. Here, in collaboration with a Coast Salish Nation in British Columbia, Canada, we used expert Indigenous knowledge and network analyses to chronicle differences in fisheries portfolios pre and post a social-ecological regime shift. We then evaluated key drivers of change using semi-structured interviews. We found that while portfolios decreased in diversity of seafood types harvested and consumed among individuals overtime, portfolios increased in their diversification at the community level because more similar seafoods within less diverse individual portfolios were more commonly harvested and consumed by the Nation as a whole. Thus, diversity can operate simultaneously in opposing directions at different scales of organization. Experts identified four key mechanisms driving these changes, including commercial activities controlled by a centralized governance regime, intergenerational knowledge loss, adaptive learning to new ecological and economic opportunities, and the trading of seafood with other Indigenous communities. Unexpectedly, increased predation by marine mammals was also flagged as a key driver of change. Adaptation strategies that support access to and governance of diverse fisheries, exchange of seafoods among communities, and knowledge transfer among generations would promote social-ecological resilience, food security, and community well-being.
  • OPEN ACCESS
    Including local voices in marine debris conversations to advance environmental justice for island and coastal communities: perspectives from St. Paul Island, Alaska
    FACETS • Vol. 8 • pp. 1 - 13
    Marine debris is ubiquitous across the global ocean and is an increasing threat to human health, economies, habitats, and wildlife. While local to national action plans are important in addressing this issue, they do not necessarily reflect the needs of coastal communities most heavily impacted. Remote island and coastal communities, particularly in Alaska, do not generate the majority of marine debris impacting their ecosystems; however, they are often left with the task of removal and disposal. Thus, the detrimental effects of marine debris are not only an ecological problem but an issue of environmental justice. This project aimed to catalyze the inclusion of place-based knowledge in marine debris solutions for St. Paul Island, a predominantly (>85%) Alaska Native community in the Bering Sea. We interviewed 36 community members during 2017–2020, documenting their observations of marine debris types, amount, distribution, and impacts over recent decades. Participants reported increasing plastic debris since the 1980s, particularly plastic bottles and fishing gear. Nearly 80% expressed concern about impacts to subsistence resources, including entanglement and ingestion. St. Paul Island community members’ experiences highlight that solving marine debris issues requires broader policies and mitigation strategies addressing sources of debris and advancing environmental justice by impact reduction. Furthermore, this case study can serve as an example of how locally relevant action plans can be developed in other coastal communities around the world by including knowledge and concerns of community members, as they are the most heavily and personally impacted by the marine debris on their shorelines.
  • OPEN ACCESS
    Adaptive capacity of the Maine lobster fishery: insights from the Maine Fishermen’s Climate Roundtables
    FACETS • Vol. 9 • pp. 1 - 13
    The Gulf of Maine in the northwestern Atlantic Ocean is one of the world’s fastest warming marine regions. Changes in ocean conditions are affecting growth, survival, and distribution of American lobster (Homarus americanus), which supports iconic fisheries along the coast of Maine, USA. In this study, we analyzed 15 years of oral records from the Maine Fishermen’s Climate Roundtables to explore fishermen’s observations of and responses to social–ecological changes. Fishermen reported an overall shift in lobster biomass further east and offshore, resulting in strategic expansion of fishing seasons and areas. Biomass shifts were thought to be connected to increases in temperature, decreases in salinity, a shift in ocean currents, and a loss of predator species. Fishing strategies were categorized according to five domains of adaptive capacity, but the majority of fishers’ responses fell into two domains: “access to assets” and “diversity and flexibility”. Strategies within these domains included increased expansion into federal lobster fisheries and extension of fishing seasons. Fishermen highlighted data gaps that need to be addressed to meet the challenges of climate change. Fisheries learning exchanges, such as the Climate Roundtables, create social networks that foster knowledge sharing to support the continued viability of local livelihoods.
  • OPEN ACCESS
    Excavating the regulatory process and risks posed by Alaska hardrock mine expansions
    FACETS • Vol. 10 • pp. 1 - 19
    Mining can cause environmental damage if managed improperly. Environmental impact assessments are designed to evaluate the risks of mining; however, these evaluations are hindered when mines expand their operational scope beyond activities considered in the original assessment. Our study focuses on the regulatory process of mine expansion and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Our multiple case study approach analyzed expansion projects for five hardrock mines in Alaska, USA. A media review identified expansion issues for each mine that received significant public attention. For each case, we examined government documents, media, and other literature to explore research questions related to variability in the application of environmental impact assessment procedures, the breadth and depth of public process, and issues raised during public comment periods. Across case studies, we synthesized the common themes and context dependence regarding the regulatory process of mining expansion. We found wide variation in the implementation of NEPA based on different institutional and geographic contexts, which led to unique sets of public concerns. We summarized differing levels of public engagement, varying approaches to cumulative effects analyses, and difficulties accessing public documents. These results demonstrate the challenges that mine expansions pose to conducting consistent and transparent environmental impact assessments.