Restoring trust: COVID-19 and the future of long-term care in Canada
Abstract
The Royal Society of Canada Task Force on COVID-19 was formed in April 2020 to provide evidence-informed perspectives on major societal challenges in response to and recovery from COVID-19. The Task Force established a series of working groups to rapidly develop policy briefings, with the objective of supporting policy makers with evidence to inform their decisions. This paper reports the findings of the COVID-19 Long-Term Care (LTC) working group addressing a preferred future for LTC in Canada, with a specific focus on COVID-19 and the LTC workforce. First, the report addresses the research context and policy environment in Canada’s LTC sector before COVID-19 and then summarizes the existing knowledge base for integrated solutions to challenges that exist in the LTC sector. Second, the report outlines vulnerabilities exposed because of COVID-19, including deficiencies in the LTC sector that contributed to the magnitude of the COVID-19 crisis. This section focuses especially on the characteristics of older adults living in nursing homes, their caregivers, and the physical environment of nursing homes as important contributors to the COVID-19 crisis. Finally, the report articulates principles for action and nine recommendations for action to help solve the workforce crisis in nursing homes.
Introduction
The moral test of government is how it treats those who are in the dawn of life, the children; those who are in the twilight of life, the aged; and those in the shadows of life, the sick, the needy and the handicapped (Humphrey 1977).
The poor conditions of care in nursing homes have, with increasing frequency, been given prominence over the last 50 years in more than 100 published reports (Table S1). Those reports come from all high-income countries, but Canada has far more than its share. A quick search of the media for just the past 10 years yields over 150 reports in Canada alone (Table S2) describing unacceptable and sometimes scandalous conditions experienced by our older adults in nursing homes. They all report similar findings, they all reflect our underlying outrage, they all make recommendations, they are all read, one or two actions are taken and then they all sit on a shelf. Nothing changes. Not really, not fundamentally. Of course great strides have been taken since the mid 20th century—newer nursing homes are organized with opportunities to better support quality of care and quality of life, dementia care programs are more regularly embedded in nursing homes, and encouraging examples of promising practices exist (Armstrong and Baines 2018, 2019). But still, concerns about quality of care and safety persist, tragic events continue, inequities deepen, root issues are not challenged, older adults suffer needlessly, and many Canadians are truly frightened at the prospect that they themselves may need to be admitted to a nursing home (2nd Canadian Division and Joint Task Force (East) 2020; 4th Canadian Division Joint Task Force (Central) 2020; Brewster and Kapelos 2020; DiManno 2020; Holroyd-Leduc and Laupacis 2020; Kirkup 2020; Lapierre 2020; Perron and Marquis 2020).
Each report and each event that motivated it are treated as isolated and unique. They are not. The persistent string of events that motivate the various reports and media coverage have their root causes in a long-fractured sector. The causes are multiple and complex, but their core is systemic and deeply institutionalized implicit attitudes about age and gender—running deeply and barely hidden. The state of nursing homes is solvable, but the solutions require choices.
COVID-19 did not, as we are hearing repeatedly, break this sector. It is simply another event. This time an event with high rates of fatalities in nursing homes globally. Nowhere are those excess death rates in nursing homes higher than in Canada (Hsu et al. 2020). COVID-19 has precipitated, in the worst circumstances, high levels of physical, mental and emotional suffering for our older adults. Those unnecessarily lost lives had value. Those older adults deserved a good closing phase of their lives and a good death. We failed them. We broke the covenant. We have a duty, a responsibility and the ability to fix this—not just to fix the current communicable disease crisis, but to fix the sector that helped that crisis wreak such avoidable and tragic havoc. We can restore trust.
How did LTC emerge and how it is governed in Canada?
Canada uses two encompassing terms for the full continuum of care outside acute care (hospitals)—long-term care (LTC) and continuing care. We focus here on 24-h residential LTC (often called nursing homes in Canada) as defined by Health Canada (Government of Canada 2004):
In general, long-term care facilities provide living accommodation for people who require on-site delivery of 24 hour, 7 days a week supervised care, including professional health services, personal care and services such as meals, laundry and housekeeping.
Most residential LTC for older adults in Canada has its roots in the Elizabethan Poor Law of 1601. In Quebec its roots are primarily in Christian religious orders. Canada’s LTC sector first unfolded as poorhouses, county homes, parishes, poor farms and almshouses. These facilities housed people who were unable to care for themselves, including older adults, people with mental illnesses and people living in poverty. Depending on jurisdiction, some facilities were associated with charities and religious orders. Over time, people in different groups were separated into different facilities. Facilities housing only older adults were introduced gradually during the early part of the 20th century. Some of those early facilities were in use well into the 1950s in parts of Canada.
Provincial and territorial jurisdiction over LTC stems from interpretation of the Constitution Act of 1867. From 1977 to 1996 the federal government provided cost-shared funding for beds for the elderly and on a per capita basis for LTC, through its Canada Assistance Plan and Extended Health Care Services program. However, LTC remains outside universally insured health services protected by the Canada Health Act (MacDonald 2015). Health Canada notes that:
Long-term facilities-based care is not publicly insured under the Canada Health Act. It is governed by provincial and territorial legislation. Across the country, jurisdictions offer a different range of services and cost coverage. Consequently, there is little consistency across Canada in: what facilities are called (e.g., nursing home, personal care facility, residential continuing care facility, etc.), the level or type of care offered, how it is measured, how facilities are governed, or who owns them (Government of Canada 2004).
We summarize differences in LTC across provinces in Table S3.
Hope: Research offers promising practices in the LTC sector
Much of what follows in this report is sobering, but we must face the reality of what we have let happen in the care of our most vulnerable older adults. We must also learn from it, so that we do not continue to reach short-sighted and siloed solutions that just patch over the issues. Here we outline some of the promising practices in the LTC sector that exist internationally and across Canada.
A body of research (conducted by Working Group members and others) tackles multiple challenges and solutions in improving nursing homes:
•
Re-imagining Long Term Residential Care—A research program led out of York University (Toronto) examines and evaluates approaches to care, work organization, accountability, and financing and ownership (Armstrong 2020; Armstrong and Armstrong 2020). They also address unpaid work, invisible women and healthy aging in nursing homes.
•
Family/friend caregivers of older people needing assistance and formal caregivers and human resource issues in LTC and home care (Mount Saint Vincent University 2020a). This research group out of Mount Saint Vincent University also studies end-of-life care in nursing homes, dementia care, rural aging and the physical nursing home environment (Mount Saint Vincent University 2020b).
•
Translating Research in Elder Care, a longitudinal program of applied research in residential LTC at the University of Alberta (TREC 2020). This team studies quality of care, quality of life and quality of work life in nursing homes. They develop and evaluate strategies and interventions to improve quality in all these domains.
A number of the Working Group members have chaired panels investigating various aspects of quality in nursing homes (Donner et al. 2012, 2015; Bourbonnais and Ducharme 2015; Keefe et al. 2018; Bourbonnais et al. 2020) or the roles of families (Ducharme 2014; Ducharme et al. 2015), or have been active members of teams generating reports and recommendations (MacDonald et al. 2019; National Institute on Ageing 2019; Research Institute for Aging 2019). Their policy, data and legal expertise also informs this document. Other Working Group members have conducted research on family caregivers of persons with dementia (Ducharme et al. 2015, 2016), civil liberties, future financing of LTC (MacDonald et al. 2019), evidence-based care of older adults, personal support worker education, care worker communication (McGilton et al. 2011), the relationship between staffing and care quality (Boscart et al. 2018), care models for residential care settings (Keller et al. 2017; McGilton et al. 2018), and impacts on the vulnerable during COVID-19 (Armstrong et al. 2020; Flood et al. 2020).
Together, and in addition to an enormous international body of research on nursing homes, we have an abundance of promising solutions. There is no one solution. We can look for guidance to models used by other countries in Scandinavia and Europe, such as Dementia Villages and Green Farms. In our own country, excellent nursing homes have been studied and will continue to need to be studied. Some nursing homes in Canada in some locations prepared for and avoided COVID-19 infections and deaths of residents to date, or have managed outbreaks well (Mazur 2020). For example, in Kingston, Ontario, long-term care homes have seen few COVID-19 cases. In Edmonton, Alberta, one family-run nursing home remains COVID-19 free. We need to understand how they were able to achieve this and why others did not. For example, what was the role of regulation and inspection in better or worse outcomes?
The first challenge is not that we lack evidence. We have a great deal of evidence that would contribute to major improvements, but this evidence has not been acted on.
Second, researchers alone cannot transform the LTC sector—our role is to bring high-quality evidence. Evidence, even when transformed into useable formats, still requires assessing and balancing benefit with issues of context, scale and cost. We have decades of evidence that languishes on shelves for many reasons, but at root the problem is a lack of political will to hear hard messages. One prime example is evidence on the right amount and type of staffing. This is, without any doubt whatsoever, one of the most critical components of quality in nursing homes.
Third, we must rigorously and comparatively evaluate reforms as they occur across Canada to improve LTC. This requires good data, something we are embarrassingly short of in the LTC sector.
Fourth, change in the LTC sector requires strong decisive leadership that is willing to move past incrementalism and tinkering at the margins to true transformative change. Leadership must also be willing to devote the resources needed to achieve this. We will need the ability and courage to not only implement promising practices, but also to cease practices that are not useful or effective.
Finally, and perhaps most importantly—if we are going to fix the LTC sector—Canadians and our governments will have to decide if it matters enough to us to do the hard work. This is a choice. We have a tremendous basis for hope that we can make this sector better for vulnerable older adults in nursing homes, but we will have to consciously and deliberately decide as a country to act on that hope.
The two current components of the COVID-19 crisis in LTC
The current pandemic challenge in the LTC sector has two major components. First, this is a crisis of excess levels of mortality in nursing homes. These far exceed the mortality rates of seasonal influenza in nursing homes (0.1% vs. 3%–4%) (World Health Organization 2020a, 2020b). Numbers are changing rapidly, but to date Canada has the highest reported proportion of COVID-19 deaths internationally for nursing home residents. Canada reports that 81% of total COVID-19 deaths are of nursing home residents (CIHI 2020a). Other comparable countries report 27% (England and Wales) (Comas-Herrera et al. 2020b), 28% (Australia) (CIHI 2020a), 31% (US) (CIHI 2020a), 34% (Denmark) (Comas-Herrera et al. 2020b), 34% (Germany) (CIHI 2020a), 47% (Scotland) (National Records of Scotland 2020), 49% (Sweden) (Comas-Herrera et al. 2020b), and 66% (Spain) (CIHI 2020a). Globally the fatality rate for people who have COVID-19 is estimated at 3.4% (World Health Organization 2020b), but that rate varies strikingly from country to country—from as low as 0.1% (Qatar) to as high as 26.3% (Yemen) (Johns Hopkins University Coronavirus Resource Center 2020). In Canada the fatality rate is estimated at 8.2% (Johns Hopkins University Coronavirus Resource Center 2020) but the Canadian fatality rate of nursing home residents is estimated at 25% (range 11%–35%) (Hsu et al. 2020). The global fatality rate for all persons over age 85, regardless of location, is 10%–27% (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2020).
Second, and at least as disturbing, COVID-19 in nursing homes is a humane crisis. It is a crisis of how these older adults died and how they are still dying. In the most extreme cases seen in Europe, the US, and Canada, harsh media images remain with us—older adults abandoned, left alone to die in their own excrement, without food or water, utterly alone (2nd Canadian Division and Joint Task Force (East) 2020; 4th Canadian Division Joint Task Force (Central) 2020; Brewster and Kapelos 2020; CBC News 2020a, 2020b; D’Amours 2020; DiManno 2020; Feinstein 2020; Hager 2020; Kirkup 2020; Lapierre 2020; Lee 2020; Perron and Marquis 2020). These images galvanized the world. Emergency measures have been instituted and the worst of this devastating crisis in a limited number of nursing homes has lessened, but older adults in nursing homes remain at extremely high risk—they are still dying and dying alone at high rates. Exacerbating the humane crisis is that 87% of nursing home residents have cognitive impairment (National Institute on Ageing 2019), 25% have a severe cognitive impairment (Hoben et al. 2019a), and two thirds have a stated diagnosis of dementia (Estabrooks et al. 2013; CIHI 2020c). They are anxious and afraid, unable to make sense of the people around them dressed in protective equipment, faces covered and voices muffled. These residents do best when things are familiar, but these are unfamiliar times in which to live and to die.
Deep, long-standing causes of the COVID-19 crisis in the LTC sector
Canada’s response to COVID-19 has exposed long-standing, wide-spread and pervasive deficiencies in the LTC sector. Deep operational cracks compromise a pandemic response. They also sabotage ongoing quality of care, quality of life and a good death, quality of work life for staff, and health and safety of residents, caregivers, family and staff. Deficiencies are underpinned by implicit negative attitudes on the value and need for expertise in LTC. While the following problems occur to potentially differing degrees in all jurisdictions, they are recognized as common across jurisdictions.
1.
Canada has failed to confront present and future financing of LTC. This requires first identifying a national perspective on what older Canadians who need to live in a nursing home should be able to expect. Financing a sturdy LTC sector also connects intimately with all other components of continuing care, including community programming, home care, assisted living and retirement homes. When those interlocking components are stronger, needs for nursing homes will be lower. However, the need for nursing homes will not and should not go away. The key for older Canadians is the right care, in the right place, at the right time.
2.
Canada has failed to optimize integration across community, continuing care and acute care sectors. These settings largely function independently and ignore the important and frequent transitions that happen across settings. Further, what happens in one of these settings, such as an outbreak of communicable disease, can and does affect all other sectors. Integration will require, among other things, robust linked data and a whole-system governance approach. If a whole-system approach had been in place, then hospitals would not have discharged people who tested positive for COVID-19 back to nursing homes without proper infection control.
3.
Canada lacks data for managing the LTC sector. This lack is pervasive and deep. If Canada cannot measure the vital aspects of this sector, we cannot effectively manage it. Managing a complex sector such as LTC embedded in the larger continuing care sector—without data—is like managing with a Ouija board. However, standardized (or any) data collection, analysis and use remain minimal across Canada.
We have no shortage of data sources to cite. But this does not mean that Canada has sufficient data to manage a complex LTC sector. Many sources cited here are from other countries. Many studies cited are cross-sectional and cannot be used to determine causes. Studies are incredibly inconsistent in methods used and in the settings and individuals included. Few studies are longitudinal, and many are small “one-off” studies that we cannot confidently extrapolate to Canada’s large, complex and heterogenous LTC sector. It has been 25 years since the only available good quality, substantive multi-country comparison was carried out that included Canada (Van Nostrand et al. 1995). It focused on basic descriptions of services, residents, finding, regulations and staffing, and was somewhat biased to one province.
Canada requires data on its own nursing homes, on the residents, on the staff working in them and on the LTC sector broadly:
•
Robust administrative data on aspects such as finances, payroll (staffing levels, actual hours worked by category of worker, staff mixes and costs), staff events (absences for illness or other reasons, turnover, retention, injury rates and costs) and resident dispositions (transfers to and from acute care, deaths in home vs in acute care, etc.). For COVID-19, such data must include availability of personal protective equipment (PPE), diagnostic supplies and testing, and medication stocks matched to master lists of residents where this is relevant.
•
Routinely collected and comparable data on care quality and outcomes of care. Currently not all provinces use the international standard of the interRAI suite of measurement tools for nursing homes (interRAI 2020).
•
Routinely collected data on quality of work life for all levels of the nursing home workforce using validated measurements. Examples of key data are job satisfaction, intention to leave, health status, burnout, work engagement, empowerment, and measures of work processes (e.g., missed care, rushed care, working short-staffed).
•
Routinely collected data on resident quality of life using measurement tools validated with people who have moderate to severe levels of dementia.
•
Routinely collected data on experiences of unpaid caregivers: family and friends of nursing home residents.
•
Routinely collected data on volunteers and paid companions.
•
Publicly available. comprehensive, and relevant data for each nursing home.
4.
Canada is not using data to act. Having good quality, comprehensive and verified data is only half the battle. To be of value, data must be fed back to provincial and territorial governments, the federal government, the managers of health regions, nursing home organizations (e.g., owners and managers of chains of nursing homes), and importantly, managers of individual nursing homes. It must be acted on and the results evaluated. This is a continuous cycle required for any learning health system seeking to improve. The data must be in useable forms, with expectations and accountabilities for sound management. Just feeding back large quantities of data to managers in the LTC sector is completely inadequate. The data must be accessible and understandable, we must implement supports to help managers act on data and evaluate the impact of those actions, and accountabilities must be clear and transparent.
5.
Canada has failed to look at LTC accreditation and regulation in a whole systems way, with best practices underpinning regulation. We have also failed to systematically and regularly revisit regulation, monitoring and enforcement as a whole systems process. Nursing home care is both heavily regulated and highly risk-averse. Conversely, it is still missing critical pieces of regulation such as workforce standards and quality of work conditions. These broad regulation factors (or lack thereof) negatively affect quality of life and end of life, and quality of care. When we as individuals see a primary health care provider or go to a hospital, we have standards of expectation for staff preparation and experience. We do not expect to avoid all risk through severe restrictions in our own lives or in our health care.
6.
Levels of regulated staff in nursing homes have been systematically reduced, including staff providing medical coverage, regulated nursing staff and all other regulated health professionals such as physical and recreational therapists (CIHI 2017). Work by therapists, for example, links directly with both quality of care and quality of life. Social and spiritual care are too often nearly non-existent. Most members of these professional groups are women.
7.
The unregulated workforce that provides upwards of 90% of direct resident care in nursing homes has no voice (Hewko et al. 2015). We do not count these care aides and personal support workers accurately in Canada, we do not regulate them, and we do not have consistent educational standards or ongoing continuing education standards for them across Canada. Despite their daily contact with residents, they are rarely engaged in decision-making about resident care and rarely included in family conferences. More than 90% are women, up to 70% are over 40, about 60% speak English as a second language (Estabrooks et al. 2015b; Chamberlain et al. 2019b), and about half in urban centres are immigrants (Estabrooks et al. 2015b; Chamberlain et al. 2019b).
8.
We have failed to support resilience of a paid nursing home workforce that is more than 90% women. More women than men undertake significant caregiving responsibilities outside of work for children and for aging parents. Lack of affordable and accessible childcare or respite care sharply reduce the capacity of these workers to respond to crisis situations in their LTC work. Under pandemic conditions, and in preparation for a possible second wave of COVID-19, this must be changed immediately for the paid LTC workforce.
9.
We have not developed or adequately supported managers and leaders in the LTC sector, either with adequate, ongoing leadership and management training or with sufficient resources to manage their nursing homes effectively and optimally.
10.
We have not maintained adequate levels of properly oriented dietary, laundry and housekeeping staff, and have not recognized their role in creating a quality nursing home environment.
11.
Canada has generally failed to acknowledge the profound inequities and inequalities faced by many older Canadians, which are exacerbated in nursing homes. High among them is poverty, a particular problem when fees are attached to many services and products and treatments. Poverty is an independent risk factor for lower health-related quality of life (McIntosh et al. 2009; Ross et al. 2009; Dorman et al. 2013; Tjepkema et al. 2013). We also see inequity and inequality based on mental illness, substance abuse and addiction, homelessness, absence of family or friends, intellectual and physical disability, visible minority status, Indigenous status and LGBTQ2S+1 identity.
12.
Older Canadians with dementia living in nursing homes. They are no longer part of Canada’s economic engine. They no longer vote. They are rendered voiceless by advanced age, debilitating diseases and our inadequate care and attention. Two thirds of them are women, and two thirds of them are persons with dementia. Their voice must be restored.
13.
Canada has systematically failed to deal with the consequences of population trends in aging, dementia prevalence and fewer family caregivers for older adults. We have relied increasingly on family to provide unpaid care without appropriately supporting them. We do not acknowledge the economic value of that care, or the high physical and mental health consequences of that work, or the loss of family caregivers from Canada’s broader workforce (OECD 2011a; CIHI 2020d). Two thirds to three quarters of unpaid caregivers are women (National Center on Caregiving at Family Caregiver Alliance 2003; Chitayat 2009; OECD 2011a; Williams et al. 2012; CIHI 2020d). Under pandemic conditions, they may be caring for older family members and simultaneously home schooling children, bearing the brunt of the burden caused by the pandemic. Some families can afford to employ private paid companions for older adults with dementia in nursing homes during normal times, but those employees may or may not be formally trained to fill gaps in care and companionship. This also requires that families enter into employer relationships that they may be ill equipped to manage.
1
LGBTQ2S+: Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, questioning, two spirit. + refers to other sexual identities including pansexual, asexual and omnisexual.
The challenges ahead in nursing homes
Pre-pandemic characteristics of older adults living in nursing homes
We cannot build a better sector if we do not understand the people it is intended to serve. By 2036, up to 25% of Canadians will be 65 or older (Statistics Canada 2018), with the most rapid growth in people 85+ (Statistics Canada 2017b). Our changing population structure will sharply increase the number of Canadians living with Alzheimer’s disease and other age-related dementias. Today, 1 in 40 Canadians aged 65–74 and 1 in 3 over 85 have an age-related dementia (CIHI 2010; Alzheimer Society of Canada 2016; Feldman and Estabrooks 2017). Without dramatic preventive, curative or treatment breakthroughs, more and more of these people will rely heavily on supportive care services such as nursing homes, especially in advanced stages of dementia.
At any given time about 1.2% of older Canadians live in nursing homes or residences for older adults (Statistics Canada 2017a). About 225 000 older adults live in nursing homes (Statistics Canada 2012) and another 168 000 in other types of residences for older adults (Statistics Canada 2012). However, turnover in nursing homes is rapid. About 80% of residents either die in the nursing home or are discharged or transferred to hospital immediately before death (McGregor et al. 2007; Menec et al. 2009). Thus, over the span of each year, many more than 225 000 older Canadians live in nursing homes. While waiting times for older adults to enter nursing homes are beyond the scope of this report, we know that they are unacceptably long: 150 d from community and 100 d from acute care in Ontario, for example (Ontario Long Term Care Association 2019; Health Quality Ontario 2020).
The characteristics of older adults in nursing homes have changed dramatically over the last two decades. From 2011/2012 to 2018/2019, the proportion of residents living with moderate to severe cognitive impairment passed 60% in most provinces and reached 68% in Ontario. During the same period, the proportion of residents aged 85+ (the oldest old) increased from 49% to 54% (CIHI 2013, 2020c). Canadians are now entering nursing homes when they are older, more dependent and have more complex medical and social needs (Hirdes et al. 2011; Doupe et al. 2012; Estabrooks et al. 2013; Koller et al. 2014; Paque et al. 2018; Hoben et al. 2019a; Armitage and Nellums 2020; Aung et al. 2020; CIHI 2020c; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2020; Simard and Volicer 2020). Between 65% and 70% of nursing home residents are women (Hirdes et al. 2011; OECD 2011b; Estabrooks et al. 2013; Public Health Agency of Canada 2018; CIHI 2020c). They have multiple co-existing health conditions, such as dementia and chronic heart, lung, kidney and metabolic diseases including diabetes.
Residents in nursing homes also more and more reflect the tremendous heterogeneity of Canadian society, for example:
•
LGBTQ2S+ identity: Increasing numbers of LGBTQ2S+ older adults require nursing home care. Roughly 3% of Canadians identify as LGBTQ2S+, but actual numbers are underreported and likely much higher (Statistics Canada 2015). Members of the LGBTQ2S+ community are largely invisible within LTC sector services, and reporting on that community is often inaccurate and unreliable (Brotman et al. 2003). LGBTQ2S+ older adults express numerous fears about going to a nursing home (Schwinn and Dinkel 2015).
•
Require a public guardian: Older adults with reduced decision-making capacity and no family or friends may require a public guardian (Chamberlain et al. 2018). Prevalence of this group in nursing homes is around 4% in Alberta and can be extrapolated to roughly 9000 people nationally (Chamberlain et al. 2019a). They often have unmet personal and care needs and experience poor quality of life (Chamberlain et al. 2020). Many have experienced homelessness or lived with mental health issues and alcohol or substance use (Chamberlain et al. 2020).
•
Mental illness: Many more older adults in nursing homes have a serious mental illness than older adults in the community. Reportedly 40% of older adults living in nursing homes in Ontario need psychiatric services (Perlman et al. 2019), but less than 5% receive that care. Depression, dementia and anxiety are the most common mental health problems in nursing homes (Seitz et al. 2010). Bipolar depression, major depressive disorder and schizophrenia also occur independent of dementia (Fornaro et al. 2020). A recent review reports that nearly 25% of nursing home residents in North America without dementia experience major depressive disorders (Fornaro et al. 2020). In Canada, 27% have depression and approximately 23% have depression and dementia (Seitz et al. 2010; Hoben et al. 2019b).
•
Race: Canada is multi-racial and that is reflected in our nursing homes, but data on race and ethnic group are not routinely collected (Scoffield 2020). This is particularly problematic because COVID-19 has differentially affected racialized populations.
Pre-pandemic characteristics of care for older adults living in nursing homes
The goals of care in nursing homes differ radically from goals in the acute care (hospital) sector. For nursing home residents, their goals of care centre on quality of life, quality of life as the end of life nears, and a good death. A good death is an eventual, anticipated and appropriate outcome. In the US in 2009, 1 in 4 deaths of people on Medicare occurred in nursing homes. (Teno et al. 2013). Despite this and although palliative care in nursing homes is rapidly evolving (Hunt et al. 2020), palliative services are often unavailable (Dingfield et al. 2020). We do know that older adults in Canada face significant gaps in accessing palliative services (CIHI 2020b), but we do not have evidence on the quality of palliative care in nursing homes across Canada or to what extent “palliative approaches” are implemented (Sawatsky et al. 2017). We do know that structural inequity has a profound impact on access to palliative care generally (Stajduhar 2020).
Residents of nursing homes experience unacceptable rates of highly burdensome symptoms and high rates of potentially inappropriate care at the end of life in Canada (Estabrooks et al. 2015a; Hoben et al. 2016) and internationally (Mitchell et al. 2009, 2016; Hendriks et al. 2015). Burdensome symptoms are highly distressing, largely preventable or treatable, and cause unnecessary suffering. Common burdensome symptoms for nursing home residents are pain (26%–86%) (Bernabei et al. 1998; Won et al. 1999, 2004; Reynolds et al. 2002; Hanson et al. 2008; Duncan et al. 2009; Hunnicutt et al. 2017; Ersek et al. 2020), eating problems (47%–70%) (Reynolds et al. 2002; Hanson et al. 2008, 2013; Lindroos et al. 2019), shortness of breath (10%–75%) (Hall et al. 2002; Reynolds et al. 2002; Hanson et al. 2008; Duncan et al. 2009; Drageset et al. 2014; Hendriks et al. 2015), and delirium (29%–46%) (Hall et al. 2002; Duncan et al. 2009; Cheung et al. 2018).
On average, nursing home residents experience more than one transfer to hospital in their last days of life (Li et al. 2013; Temkin-Greener et al. 2013; Mitchell 2015; McCarthy et al. 2020). Of those transfers, 75% could have been avoided because appropriate treatment was available in the nursing home or because transfer to hospital was inconsistent with resident and family preferences (Givens et al. 2012; Mitchell 2015). Common (but usually inappropriate) care at end of life in nursing homes includes administering antipsychotic medication without a diagnosis of psychosis (Schneider et al. 2006; Banerjee 2009; Declercq et al. 2013; Juola et al. 2016; Gurwitz et al. 2017), inappropriate medication management for depression (Burns and Winblad 2006; Choi et al. 2008), use of physical restraints (Engberg et al. 2008; Castle and Engberg 2009; Köpke et al. 2012; Foebel et al. 2016; Abraham et al. 2019), multiple simultaneous medications prescribed (Tamura et al. 2012; Jokanovic et al. 2015; Kröger et al. 2015; Martín-Pérez et al. 2019), indwelling urinary catheters (Flaherty 2004; Getliffe 2008; Gurwitz et al. 2016), and aggressive treatments such as renal dialysis (Muthalagappan et al. 2013; Tamura et al. 2017) or non-pain-related intravenous therapy such as antibiotics (Mitchell et al. 2004; Volicer 2004; Thompson et al. 2020).
Nursing home care in Canada is not structured or staffed to maintain or improve the functional abilities of residents. For example, residents often lose functional mobility rapidly (Slaughter et al. 2011). Up to 70% of nursing home residents use wheelchairs (Gavin-Dreschnack et al. 2005; Wick and Zanni 2007; Hirdes et al. 2011; Giesbrecht et al. 2017), putting them at high risk for injury from falls, incontinence, pressure injuries and pneumonia (Slaughter et al. 2015).
The special case of dementia
Life expectancy continues to rise in Canada, along with chronic diseases. On average, Canadian women can expect to live 84 years and men 79.9 years (Statistics Canada 2019). Critically for the LTC sector, dementia has increased dramatically. Globally, 75 million people will have a dementia by 2030 and 131.5 million by 2050 (Alzheimer’s Disease International 2015). Today, one in 40 Canadians aged 65–74 years old and one in three over 85 years old have an age-related dementia (CIHI 2010; Alzheimer Society of Canada 2016; Feldman and Estabrooks 2017). By 2038 1.125 million Canadians, or almost 3% of the entire population, are projected to have an age-related dementia (CIHI 2010). Rates of dementia will continue to climb because age is the major risk factor.
Dementia is itself life-limiting. Dementia is an umbrella term for a set of degenerative brain disorders. It results in decreasing cognitive and functional abilities, starting with higher brain functions for planning, focus and memory. Eventually even low brain activities such as bladder and bowel control, recognition, moving and swallowing do not function. Dementia is ultimately fatal if something else does not cause death first, such as pneumonia (Kua et al. 2014; Haaksma et al. 2018). People with dementia experience progressive decline. Even assuming optimization of all community care, home care and alternative supported living, eventually the care demands of dementia normally exceed the coping capacity of family and community. Unsurprisingly then, dementia is the major driver of admission to nursing homes. More than two-thirds of older adults with dementia will require nursing home care (Toot et al. 2017; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2017). Dementia can be an untenable challenge during crises such as COVID-19—and some countries have discussed rationing of resources for people with dementia, raising complex questions of discrimination and vulnerability (Cipriani and Fiorino 2020). We are also learning that older adults with dementia have a different disease course and symptoms for COVID-19 and have higher mortality rates than those without dementia (Bianchetti et al. 2020).
Dementia defines the complex health and social care that is required in nursing homes. Dementia care is demanding and specialized (Kuske et al. 2007; Rapaport et al. 2017; Alzheimer Society of Canada 2020; Wang et al. 2020). It requires knowledgeable and skilled staff. It is patently false that anyone can provide health and social care for people with dementia.
Pre-pandemic characteristics of the workforce in LTC
We cannot build a better LTC sector if we do not understand, value, train and appropriately compensate the people who deliver the essential services needed by the older adults living in nursing homes. In the past, many older adults lived in an “old age home.” People who required a higher level of medical care lived in facilities staffed by regulated nurses (registered nurses and licensed practical nurses), with some complementary care by nursing assistants or orderlies. As costs increased, staff configurations changed.
Today we see a decline in all regulated caregivers in most jurisdictions (McGregor et al. 2010; Seblega et al. 2010)—even as the medical and social needs of older adults in nursing homes have risen sharply. The dominant staffing model in nursing homes now is a few registered nurses and some licensed practical nurses. Most direct care of residents is carried out by unregulated staff variously called care aides, personal support workers, orderlies or nurse assistants. Small numbers of other regulated care providers are included in the mix: physiotherapists and physio aides, recreation therapists and aides, social workers, occupational therapists, and others. Evidence exists, and continues to grow, that staffing levels and staffing mix are linked to quality of care (Bostick et al. 2006; Castle 2008; Hyer et al. 2011; Spilsbury et al. 2011; Backhaus et al. 2014) and quality of work life (Cummings et al. 2017).
The unregulated paid workforce
Personal support workers, care aides, orderlies, nurse assistants
Workers in nursing homes care for frail, vulnerable older adults with increasingly complex medical and social needs. Those needs of residents have a significant impact on unregulated care aides, the predominant staff in nursing homes who provide upwards of 90% of direct care (Office of Inspector General 2002; Association of Canadian Community Colleges 2012; Baughman and Smith 2012; Daly and Szebehely 2012; Caspar 2014). Care aides have limited formal training and manage high workloads with frequent interruptions (Mallidou et al. 2013). They frequently experience responsive behaviours of dementia from residents, such as being yelled at and hit (Zeller et al. 2009; Estabrooks et al. 2015b; Hewko et al. 2015; Chamberlain et al. 2019b). They are at high risk for job dissatisfaction (Squires et al. 2015), burnout (Chamberlain et al. 2017) and poor mental and physical health (Hoben et al. 2017). In addition, care aides are themselves a vulnerable group, mostly older women from ethnic minorities (Chamberlain et al. 2019b).
Canada cannot currently plan for a workforce with sufficient numbers of well-trained staff to secure quality care in nursing homes. We do not even accurately count the numbers of unregulated workers providing care in Canadian nursing homes or in other LTC settings, such as retirement homes or private homes. It is impossible using data national data sources to tease out where the unregulated workers are actually working and in what numbers. No data are routinely collected nationally or provincially on the characteristics of the care aide workforce or on the quality of their work life or on standards in each province for their training.
By searching websites and tapping our professional networks in the LTC sector, we collected limited information on care aides nationally (Table S4). From published research, media reports and informal channels, we also know that, pre-pandemic:
•
Care aides receive the lowest wages in the health care sector ($12–$24 per hour) (CBC News 2020c; Henderson 2020; Government of Alberta n.d.).
•
Care aides receive variable and minimal formal education.
•
Many care aides cannot get full-time or regular part-time work with benefits, because some employers rely on casual staff (McGilton et al. 2020; Yinfei et al. 2020).
•
In some provinces, such as Ontario, many care aides are hired out on demand to nursing homes through agencies. Care aides with these agencies are not well paid, although nursing homes pay a premium for them. Agency staff may not be well oriented to LTC, making team work more difficult and increasing the work of already stretched staff.
•
No groups of care aides are regulated or licensed in Canada. Few are registered (Estabrooks et al. 2015b; Kelly and Bourgeault 2015; Chamberlain et al. 2019b).
•
All care aides work at the bottom of a rigid hierarchy. They are rarely engaged in decision-making about care for residents and rarely included in family conferences or in decisions about how a nursing home is organized or governed (Song et al. 2020b).
•
Pre-pandemic, a nursing home resident received only 2.2–2.3 h of direct (worked) care from care aides in each 24-h period (Estabrooks et al. 2015b; Cummings et al. 2017).
Largely from an ongoing longitudinal study in western Canada we know that, pre-pandemic, frontline care aides:
•
are mainly middle-aged or older women (66%–71%) (Estabrooks et al. 2015b)
•
are often newcomers or immigrants (60% of care aides working in urban areas), with English as their second language (Chamberlain et al. 2019b)
•
are often not required to complete any continuing education and are often not offered it (Estabrooks et al. 2015b)
•
often work in more than one job (25%–30%) and in health care settings other than nursing homes (e.g., hospitals; 15%) (Estabrooks et al. 2015b; Hewko et al. 2015; Chamberlain et al. 2019b; Song et al. 2020a; Van Houtven et al. 2020; Yinfei et al. 2020)
•
often work short-staffed (Song et al. 2020b)
•
have insufficient time to complete necessary care tasks and must rush essential care (up to 65% of care aides per shift) (Song et al. 2020a)
•
are at worryingly high risk for burnout and physical injury (Estabrooks et al. 2015b; Hewko et al. 2015; Chamberlain et al. 2017, 2019b)
•
report feeling that their work is important and has meaning, despite high levels of work-related stress (Estabrooks et al. 2015b; Chamberlain et al. 2019b; Song et al. 2020b)
The impact of COVID-19 on psychological health and safety of direct care workers in nursing homes is being added to already worrisome pre-existing trends (Braedley et al. 2018). Studies from the 2003 SARS epidemic (Styr et al. 2008) and recent studies documenting effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on point-of-care workers in China (Lai et al. 2020b) point to severe long-term traumatic impacts on mental health of point-of-care staff. Care aides are already under severe psychological stress and are predicted to develop symptoms of acute stress disorder, depression, alcohol abuse, anxiety, insomnia and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) even years after the COVID-19 pandemic (Brooks et al. 2020).
Unregulated indirect care workers
Additional large groups of unregulated workers in nursing homes are housekeeping, laundry and food services staff. They contribute importantly to infection control, to the sense of each nursing home as home for residents, and to quality of life (Müller et al. 2018). However, many such services are contracted out and those staff are less integrated into nursing homes. Despite their essential work, we have little data on them and few studies include them. A notable exception is work out of York University (Armstrong 2020; Armstrong et al. 2020). Although these workers are rarely considered when nursing home reform and redesign are discussed, they are key to a high-quality and safe nursing home.
The regulated paid workforce
Medical coverage in nursing homes varies significantly across provinces, from a designated roster of family physicians who care for residents at one or more nursing homes to an individual resident’s family physician (Ågotnes et al. 2019). Some regions use combinations of these or offer almost no care on site (“medical care by fax”). A few provinces and regions offer medical coverage by nurse practitioners, either primarily or in collaboration with general and specialist medical services. Access to mental health services varies widely and is usually by consultation only when it is available (Grabowski et al. 2010). Mental health and palliative services are generally insufficient to meet demand (CIHI 2018). We still know little about availability of palliative services for residents who died in nursing homes under COVID-19 conditions.
Nursing homes also require a diverse cadre of regulated nursing and other health professionals. Most numerous are nurses—registered nurses, licensed practical nurses and registered psychiatric nurses (and in some nursing homes in some provinces, nurse practitioners). Over the past two decades, ratios of regulated nurses to care aides have steadily declined (Statistics Canada 2006; McGregor et al. 2010). At the same time, regulated nursing staff must give more time to required documentation (“paperwork”)—time that is taken from direct care and supervision. Numbers of registered nurses have also decreased in favour of licensed practical nurses as a cost saving measure (McGregor et al. 2010). These changes reflect widening inability or reluctance to meet the increasingly complex needs of nursing home residents by matching those needs to appropriate nursing skills (McGilton et al. 2020).
Nursing homes often lack access to an array of specialized services accessible to all residents. Residents often need support from physical, occupational, speech and recreational therapists and technicians. Skills of those workers affect both care quality and quality of life by prolonging mobility, optimizing assistive devices, assisting with swallowing difficulties (often encountered by people with later-stage dementia), and programming meaningful recreational and social options. Social workers and pastoral care are important in assisting both residents and families. However, as cost containment becomes more pressing, all regulated services have dwindled despite a resident population with higher needs than ever before (McGregor et al. 2010; Hsu et al. 2016).
Many nursing home residents need access to uninsured services such as vision care, dental care, hearing care, podiatry, assessment for hip protectors, and special mobility devices or wheelchairs. Few mobile services come to nursing homes, so residents and caregivers (paid or unpaid) must travel to the service. Not all service providers even can or will offer services to nursing home residents with impaired mobility or dementia.
Sensory loss is a major impairment in dementia, making lack of vision and hearing services a serious concern. Lack of dental care is a major problem for health, quality of care and quality of life (Hoben et al. 2020; Yoon et al. 2020). Dental needs are increasing dramatically as Canadians age with their own teeth and with complex dental work (bridges, crowns, implants) that require specialized care—care that is not available in nursing homes.
Workforce staffing and staffing mix for quality of care and quality of life
Most studies on appropriate staffing mix in acute care and nursing homes have been in the US, with some in Europe and almost none in Canada. Most studies in acute care are highly focused on effects of daily hours (Aiken and Sloane 2020) of nursing care on one outcome, such as mortality (Estabrooks et al. 2005; McHugh et al. 2016). Recent papers point out wide differences in regulated staffing hours (Geng et al. 2019). Reviews of staffing studies, most in the US (Spilsbury et al. 2011; Castle 2012; Backhaus et al. 2014; Dellefield et al. 2015; Easton et al. 2016), all identify major issues with how studies were conducted and lack of comparability across studies. However, a body of evidence has emerged despite the inherent challenges of cross-sectional studies and other methodological challenges. In 2001, the Centres for Medicare & Medicaid Services in the US issued a major report to Congress on nursing home staffing (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 2001). Since then multiple reports have increased pressure and guidance, despite the challenges, to bring standards to bear on US nursing homes. US health care is organized differently and data and findings are not directly translatable to Canada, but they illustrate trends that likely are significantly similar between the two countries. If staffing is inadequate, quality plummets.
A useful process proposed to establish adequate and appropriate staffing by all groups of nursing personnel is to: (a) determine the collective resident care needs, (b) determine the actual nurse staffing levels, (c) identify appropriate nurse staffing levels to meet resident’s care needs, (d) examine evidence on the adequacy of staffing, and (e) identify gaps between the actual and appropriate staffing levels (Harrington et al. 2020). Harrington, a recognized US leader and expert in nursing home staffing, also advises that the minimum total nursing hours to ensure care quality is about 4.1 h per resident per 24 h (Harrington et al. 2016). This does not include physician care or the allied services required for good care quality (medical, physical, occupational, recreational, speech and language therapy, social work, pastoral care, support from laundry, housekeeping and dietary). This estimated requirement of 4.1 h of nursing care in 24 h is significantly higher than nursing hours in Canada—BC has the highest recommended funded hours per resident day at 3.36 h, higher than the Canadian average of 3.30 (BC Care Providers Association 2019; Office of the Seniors Advocate 2020).
Importantly, adequate staffing is a necessary but insufficient condition for quality (Kane 2004). A nursing home is a complex adaptive system with many moving parts and multiple elements that contribute to quality of care and quality of life for residents (Anderson et al. 2003; Forbes-Thompson et al. 2007). We must not focus attention exclusively on staffing and think this will solve the challenge of quality. Other essential dimensions of quality are person-centered and relational care, strong leadership and management, working conditions and the care unit environment, the built environment, and resident and family/friend experiences. And these are just some of the essential elements required for quality. To improve quality of care, we need data that are routinely collected in multiple areas, in multiple forms—and we must put in place mechanisms and supports for these data to be acted upon and those actions evaluated. Quality data and action cycles are hallmarks of a learning health system (Lessard et al. 2017).
Canada lacks a comprehensive, data-based assessment of necessary staffing in nursing homes—minimum hours of care needed to give an acceptable level for quality of care and quality of life. Minimum hours of care must be based on each resident’s needs, on how complex their social and medical needs are and on acute needs. Assessing necessary staffing in nursing homes must also thoughtfully consider the care team required to deliver quality care. This must include staffing and skill mixes and the widest possible definition of a care team. A staffing assessment for nursing homes must also consider the needs (and solutions for those needs) of a predominately female workforce, such as childcare and care for aging parents. Finally, it must consider cost, benefit and sustained implementation.
No comprehensive empirical work has ever been done in Canada to determine minimal, adequate, appropriate, or optimal staffing needed to ensure good quality social care (quality of life) and health care (quality of care) for residents. It is long overdue.
Care by unpaid family and friends
The LTC sector and nursing homes rely increasingly on unpaid care by family members and friends of residents. These are disproportionally women, especially for daily care. They provide many different care activities. However, our society gives little attention to respite for these caregivers or to the negative effects of their caregiving burdens.
Compounding this problem, by 2050 approximately 30% fewer close family members—spouses and adult children—will be available to give this unpaid care (Carrière et al. 2007). Family configurations are changing with declining fertility rates, smaller families and families dispersed across the country and internationally. More people will have no available family or friends. Relying on unpaid care by family and friends leaves the LTC sector especially vulnerable in crises such as COVID-19, when those unpaid caregivers suddenly become unavailable—or as in the first wave of COVID-19, are not permitted into the nursing home. As with aging of our population and rising levels of dementia, the dwindling numbers of unpaid family caregivers can be predicted with some certainty—when it occurs it will not be a surprise. Whether we will be ready is uncertain.
Volunteers are often proposed to meet gaps in care and social activities for nursing home residents. However, this is not a straight-forward solution. Are there enough trained volunteers regularly available? Do volunteers receive planning, orientation and support for equitable, safe and consistent care? Are we using volunteers as a substitute for experienced and knowledgeable workers and is that appropriate? Care for residents in nursing homes is not care that just anybody can do. For example, having volunteers help residents with eating requires special training on problems with swallowing and risk of choking. Even in social activities, volunteers must be keenly aware of challenges in communicating with people living with dementia and associated disruptive behaviors.
Pre-pandemic characteristics of social, living and working spaces in nursing homes
Physical environment
The physical layout of nursing homes (~1800 in Canada) does not help to contain viruses or control infection, even in newer homes. Many nursing homes in Canada are old and were built between 1950 and 1990. Older buildings tend to be larger, with 200–400 residents. They resemble hospitals, with communal bathrooms, rooms for 2–4 residents, narrower hallways, large communal dining areas, small crowded nursing stations and medication areas, and limited areas for staff and families away from resident rooms. They may lack outdoor areas or adequate natural light and certainly lack modern technologies that improve care, such as appropriate flooring (Lachance et al. 2017). Physical distancing is nearly impossible without reducing the number of residents. Isolation or segregation of residents infected with COVID-19 is difficult within the design of these older buildings. Worryingly, we are seeing early reports of associations between facility size and age and COVID-19 status (MacDonald et al. 2019; Abrams et al. 2020).
Nursing homes built in the last 20 years often accommodate only 80–120 residents. They are designed specifically to support the social needs of residents living with dementia, with smaller “neighborhoods” of residents, physical characteristics that make living less stressful and more enjoyable for people with dementia, wide hallways and doorways, individual large bathrooms, and smaller local communal dining areas. They often have spacious and safe outdoor spaces where people living with dementia can enjoy the outdoors without danger of wandering. At least three provinces have building standards for nursing home construction that include these features (NS, AB, ON). These standards can also make physical distancing and infection control less challenging.
Plans, protocols, and resources for delivering care
When the COVID-19 outbreak occurred, nursing homes lacked capacity to handle the surge. They faced a major challenge in rethinking what care to deliver and how to deliver it. Quality of life and quality of care for residents became secondary in many instances. To have been fully prepared, nursing homes would have needed multiple plans and resources:
•
infection prevention and control through PPE sourcing and training in its use and conservation
•
strategies for clustering and isolating ill residents and those who tested positive
•
infection surveillance strategies for staff
•
appropriate policies on visitors, recognizing the risk of infection, but also recognizing how essential friends and family are to both residents’ quality of life and in providing care in understaffed facilities
•
capacity to test and carry out contact tracing
•
sufficient staff with relevant training to fill staff vacancies from illness and self-isolation, as well as volunteer vacancies
•
effective on-site leadership and management
•
ongoing, productive links to acute care hospitals
•
training in end-of-life care and access to relevant medications and staff to administer them
•
resources for end-of-life decisions
•
wellness resources for staff
•
adequate IT capacity and internet access to enable video communication with families and others
An additional complexity is that nursing homes are a social environment. Much work has been done to invite the community—families, volunteers, children, pets—into nursing homes. Many policies normally welcome this influx, rather than managing it—no set visiting hours, open door policies, free inflow of food and pets, and residents free to leave and return. Under COVID-19, nursing homes as a public social place clashed sharply with nursing homes as a safe space for residents to live and staff to work. Staff were charged with keeping the space safe. Clearly, having so many homes become hotspots for COVID-19 put an enormous strain on the willingness of residents, family and staff to comply with changes in policies in favour of safety. Communication has been a problem in many, although not all, nursing homes.
The context that created the COVID-19 crisis in LTC
Several factors operated to create the high degree of vulnerability experienced by older adults in nursing homes:
1.
Pandemic preparedness favoured acute care (hospital) settings. Nearly all effort was diverted to create surge capacity in hospitals and ICUs, leaving most nursing homes unprepared and (worse) in some jurisdictions admitting older adults from acute care.
2.
Residents in nursing homes have reduced immune system capacity as a result of aging. This markedly reduces their ability to fight any infection.
3.
COVID-19 is novel. Neither nursing home residents nor staff are vaccinated against it, unlike annual influenzas for which most residents and staff are vaccinated. Such vaccination offers herd immunity.
4.
COVID-19 is highly contagious and has a long incubation period when infected people have no symptoms. Spread can be invisible. In the early weeks of the pandemic, before this was widely known, invisible asymptomatic spread was deadly. The virus spread into and back out of nursing homes as family, visitors and staff came and went unknowingly. Basic infection control practices and PPE that should have been in place were too often missing. A proportion of nursing home staff were working in more than one nursing home and other health care facilities, silently bringing the virus in and out of nursing homes in the early weeks.
5.
Many nursing homes in Canada are physically not designed for infection control practices that are needed to avoid COVID-19 or to contain its spread. Nursing homes have many communal settings, including bathrooms, dining areas and rooms with multiple beds. Separation of COVID-19 positive residents was not recognized as critical in the early days, and many nursing homes are not physically designed to make this achievable. This is particularly challenging in care for people living with dementia who are also at risk of wandering and cannot remember to physically distance.
6.
Staff did not know or misunderstood how to prevent and control the spread of COVID-19 in the early days of the pandemic. Infection control knowledge was inadequate among care staff. The ways that nursing homes were managed to control spread varied significantly between and within provinces.
7.
Nursing homes experienced shortages of PPE, problems, and lack of support in teaching how to use PPE properly, and lack of understanding that PPE was essential for nursing homes. At times, PPE was pulled from nursing homes for the acute care sector (Butler 2020; Eaton 2020). Nursing home staff must be routinely in close contact with residents and must have PPE to care for residents adequately under COVID-19. Often PPE and education in its use did not include critical staff for infection control, such as housekeeping.
8.
Some hospitals discharged patients who tested positive for COVID-19 to nursing homes. Some hospitals would not accept infected patients from LTC settings.
9.
Up to 30% of care aides and other staff worked at more than one job. Because care aides are not in registries, these numbers were not known or considered. In the early stages of the pandemic this increased spread of COVID-19 infection.
10.
Many nursing homes lacked screening resources for symptoms, travel history, and contacts of both residents and staff. Many also lacked testing, contact tracing and plans to respond effectively.
11.
Staff were not able to work, for many reasons. Some were symptomatic and had to isolate at home. Some were sick or had a sick family member. Some had to care for children at home when schools closed. Some were afraid to work or in some instances left their posts. Fear and misinformation led to pressure on staff from families, landlords and unions to stay away from nursing homes with COVID-19 cases. The LTC sector works with a complex combination of barely enough full-time staff and mostly part-time staff. It fills the gaps with casual and agency staff, with few reserves to replace absent workers. Families, who often provide significant care, were not permitted to visit. The LTC sector could not meet unexpected pandemic pressures from reduced staffing and volunteers and the 24/7 needs of residents. Those pressures quickly became catastrophic.
12.
Troubling reports from Europe (Diamantis et al. 2020) and now Canada (2nd Canadian Division and Joint Task Force (East) 2020; 4th Canadian Division Joint Task Force (Central) 2020) indicate that many preventable deaths occurred in nursing homes under COVID-19. Some deaths were from lack of timely care, water, food or basic hygiene, not from COVID-19 infection. This underscores the frail and highly vulnerable condition of older adults in nursing homes. It epitomizes our failure. Many are not mobile or cannot vocalize their needs. This was more than a communicable disease crisis.
Principles to guide future action
While there is more to be learned about controlling COVID-19, the following principles should guide efforts to improve safety and quality of life for residents and staff of Canadian nursing homes. We must create a better future for older Canadians who need nursing home care and ensure their voices and wishes are honoured. At their heart these principles are about our shared values as Canadians.
1.
Funding must be adequate and sustained, with the federal government supporting provincial and territorial governments to achieve high standards across Canada in LTC.
2.
Quality of care in nursing homes is fundamental and intimately linked to quality of life.
3.
Quality of life for the frail elderly is a non-negotiable objective.
4.
Quality of end of life and a good death are similarly non-negotiable objectives.
5.
Standards of care are essential and must be clearly articulated along with accountability.
6.
Responsibility for policy, standards, and regulation must be clear. Desired outcomes must be articulated and evaluated, and accountability for those outcomes ensured.
7.
Routine evaluation of performance must occur, including performance measures that are important to residents and families.
8.
High-quality and comprehensive data (quantitative and qualitative) are required to manage the LTC sector and must be routinely collected, verified, analyzed, and reported for effective regulation, evaluation and monitoring.
9.
Mechanisms for acting on data must be in place and be supported from point-of-care to policy levels.
10.
Funding for nursing homes must be tied to ongoing evaluating and monitoring of indicators of quality of care, resident quality of life and quality of end of life, staff quality of worklife, and resident and family experiences. All information must be publicly accessible.
11.
The federal government must take a major role and develop a mechanism for supporting provincial and territorial governments to achieve high standards in LTC across Canada. This could be achieved through a similar framework to the Canada Health Act, where core standards are articulated. Provincial and territorial governments who meet those standards receive the additional federal LTC transfer.
12.
Working relationships must be collaborative among stakeholders—government, health authorities, nursing home owners and nursing homes themselves, with the vital input of the people who live, work in and visit nursing homes.
13.
All citizens in all regions must have universal, affordable, and equitable access to 24/7 nursing home care, if they need it, without long wait lists.
14.
There must be better integration across community, continuing care and acute care sectors. Transitions between LTC settings must be better managed, with a whole-systems approach to governance, regulation and incentive design.
15.
Nursing home staffing must be consistent and adequate, with qualified staff in the right mix of skill and knowledge.
16.
Nursing home physical environments and plans, protocols and resources for delivering care must meet complex medical, social and home-like needs of residents. They must also meet complex needs for space, safety and infection control and prevention. They must not sacrifice the ability of close family members (of origin or choice) to assist with care and be with dying residents.
Recommendations to manage COVID-19 in Canada’s LTC sector
Reform and redesign will take time. Multiple organizations globally have begun to outline the many specific and immediately practical things that need to be done to manage COVID-19 in LTC in the shorter term (Dosa et al. 2020; Hsu et al. 2020; Lai et al. 2020a; Ouslander 2020). In May 2020, Comas-Herrera et al. (2020a) outlined policy recommendations. Subsequently, members of this working group laid out their prescription in seven actions for preparing for the second wave of COVID-19 in nursing homes, reproduced here (Estabrooks et al. 2020).
“First, all (not just some) nursing homes, retirement homes and other assisted living places must each have an approved plan for responding to infectious outbreaks, including COVID-19. The plan must specify who is responsible for preventing and managing an outbreak and that person must be on site, with clear and measurable performance metrics. Residents and their families must be consulted in the development of the plan and there must be transparent reporting to the public.
Second, in-person inspection of all homes must occur regularly by the relevant public health unit (and not by an accreditation body) to ensure that plans are being operationalized and that residents and workers are safe. It should go without saying that such inspections cannot be by telephone and that LTC facilities should not be warned ahead of the inspection, which is the practice in some provinces. Results of inspections must be made public and there must be consequences for non-compliance.
Third, provincial governments must manage procurement so that LTC settings are equipped for infection control. All workers or others who come into close contact with residents in LTC settings must be equipped with adequate PPE. These same people must have proper education in infection prevention and regular ongoing support and re-education in infection control and proper PPE use and conservation. Also, all nursing homes must adopt and have resources for a “test and trace” strategy for all residents and all workers.
Fourth, LTC workers must have full time work with equitable pay and benefits, including mental health supports for the PTSD many are experiencing due to COVID-19. Many personal support workers work for minimum wage, which is unacceptable normally, given the importance of this work and the expertise required. It is ridiculous in the face of COVID-19, given the personal risks for workers and their families. Similarly, workers providing essential food, cleaning and laundry services must receive equitable pay. When the military was deployed into LTC homes, in Quebec and Ontario they were paid “danger” pay on top of their relatively robust salaries.
Fifth, jurisdictions must continue the “one site work policy” both for the duration of the pandemic and going forward. Working in two or more settings contributed to COVID-19 spread both in and out of facilities and contributes to the spread of influenza at other times.
Sixth, all LTC homes must either have the capability of properly isolating an individual with COVID-19 or clustering positive residents in one area of the LTC home. If this is not feasible, the patient must be transferred to a hospital or other appropriate setting where isolation of positive cases is possible. No hospital should discharge any suspected or confirmed case of COVID-19 back to a nursing home until the person’s infection has resolved as evidenced by a negative test. Plans for managing COVID-19 must also include access to palliative care if needed, including appropriate medications and pain control.
Seventh, response plans for LTC homes must include measures so that technology and other means are fully employed to connect residents with family and friends and that at least one or two family members can safely visit (with PPE and proper infection control practices and training). Residents are closer to the end of their lives; many have dementia. Familiar voices, support and comfort are essential, and sometimes only a family member or friend can provide that. We cannot permit people to die without care at their end of their lives, whether from COVID-19 or otherwise. Family and friends have in the past helped ensure accountability particularly when a resident is too frail to vocalize concerns or make herself heard and with the significant stresses upon workers and management through COVID-19, this line of accountability is critical (Estabrooks et al. 2020).”
Clearly, primary responsibility for LTC services rests with provincial and territorial governments, but we see across the globe serious efforts to create national coordination for a successful response to COVID-19 in the LTC sector. Canada’s reality is that, without federal financial support, provincial and territorial governments are unlikely to have resources for the high standards that our frail elderly deserve in nursing homes and LTC more broadly. We can look for inspiration to New Zealand, which was able to declare COVID-19 free status on 8 June 2020 (Graham-McLay 2020) (although it continues to see isolated new cases) (BBC News 2020). Australia and South Korea have comparatively favourable results with strong national strategies. The Australian government prioritized the aged care sector for COVID-19—“On the 11th of March, $440 million was committed to aged care including addressing staff retention and surge staffing, improving infection control. Aged care providers have priority access to the national stockpile of PPE, and health care rapid response teams and staffing support when an outbreak occur in a facility or in home care” (Low 2020). At the time of this Australian report, nursing homes had <1% of all COVID-19 cases and 17% of all deaths. This compares to Canada’s 81% of all its COVID-19 deaths in nursing homes (CIHI 2020a). South Korea’s aggressive national response to COVID-19 included nationwide monitoring and inspections, cohort quarantines of selected facilities, temporary reimbursement packages, low-cost masks for care workers, and provision of guidelines. At the time of South Korea’s report, only 8.1% of COVID-19 deaths were people in nursing homes, and another 25.9% in LTC hospitals (Kim 2020).
This Working Group, however, takes the position that reform and redesign must tackle not just the pandemic crisis, but also long-standing systemic failures—root causes—of the pandemic crisis in nursing homes in Canada. To fail in doing this leaves us with our currently woefully inadequate LTC system and the certainty that the next crisis will create similar or more catastrophic outcomes. Reform and redesign
•
must begin immediately
•
are best done within a national framework with provinces/territories and the federal government working together
•
must report progress transparently to the public in a timely manner
•
must include immediate, mid and long-term targets and ongoing evaluation, in perpetuity, on both quality and safety.
Workforce recommendations to reform and redesign LTC in Canada
We recommend that if we do nothing else, that immediately and with urgency Canada directs sustained focus, effort and resources to redress the workforce crisis in the LTC sector. Meeting this major challenge will go a long way toward ongoing redesign and reform. It will have an immediate impact on the quality of care and quality of life for vulnerable older adults in nursing homes, on their families, and on the workforce responsible for their care. A high-quality, resilient and supported workforce is, without doubt, the major component of quality.
We recommend nine steps to solving the workforce crisis in nursing homes, all of which require strong and coordinated leadership at the federal and provincial/territorial levels to implement.
1.
The federal government must immediately commission and act on a comprehensive, pan-Canadian, data-based assessment of national standards for necessary staffing and staffing mix in nursing homes, National standards must encompass the care team that is needed to deliver quality care and should be achieved by tying new federal dollars to those national standards.
2.
The Federal government must establish and implement national standards for nursing homes that ensure (a) training and resources for infectious disease control, including optimal use of personal protective equipment and (b) protocols for expanding staff and restricting visitors during outbreaks.
3.
The provincial and territorial governments, with the support of new funding from the federal government, must immediately implement appropriate pay and benefits, including sick leave, for the large and critical unregulated workforce of direct care aides and personal support workers. Appropriate pay and benefits must be permanent and not limited to the timespan of COVID-19. Pay and benefits must be equitable across the country and equitable both across the LTC sector and between the LTC and acute care sectors for regulated and unregulated staff.
4.
Provincial and territorial governments must make available full-time employment with benefits to all unregulated staff and regulated nursing staff. They should also evaluate the impact on nursing homes of “one workplace” policies now in effect in many nursing homes and the further impact on adequate care in other LTC setting such as retirement homes, hospitals and home care. Provincial and territorial governments must assess the mechanisms of infection spread from multi-site work practices and implement a robust tracking system.
5.
Provincial and territorial governments must establish and implement (a) minimum education standards for the unregulated direct care workforce in nursing homes, (b) continuing education for both the unregulated and regulated direct care workforce in nursing homes, and (c) proper training and orientation for anyone assigned to work at nursing homes through external, private staffing agencies.
6.
To achieve these education and training objectives, provincial and territorial governments must support educational reforms for specializations in LTC for all providers of direct care in nursing homes, care aides, health and social care professionals, managers and directors of care.
7.
Provincial and territorial governments, with the support of federal funds, must provide mental health supports for all nursing home staff. In addition to extraordinarily stressful pandemic working conditions, these staff are experiencing significant deaths among the older adults they have known for months and years, and among colleagues. They are grieving now, and this will continue.
8.
Federal support of the LTC sector must be tied to requirements for data collection in all appropriate spheres that are needed to effectively manage and support nursing homes and their staff. Data collected must include resident quality of care, resident quality of life, resident and family experiences, and quality of work life for staff. Data must be collected using validated, appropriate tools, such as tools suitable for residents with moderate to severe dementia. Captured data must address disparities and compounding vulnerabilities among both residents and staff, such as race, ethnicity, language, gender identity, guardianship status, socioeconomic status, religion, physical or intellectual disability status, and trauma history screening.
9.
Data collection must be transparent and at arm’s length. Provincial and territorial governments must evaluate and use data to appropriately revisit regulation and accreditation in nursing homes. They must take an evidence-based and balanced approach to mandatory accreditation, as well as to regulation and inspection of nursing homes. They must engage the LTC sector in this process, particularly the people receiving care, their families, managers and care providers.
We do not need another whole-system commission, another inquiry, another report or to have the armed forces be the best or only alternative to stem a preventable crisis in nursing homes. What we do need is a transparent national action plan with strong and coordinated national and provincial/territorial leadership, broad stakeholder input, responsibilities, accountabilities and the ability to bring resources to bear as needed. Such an action plan must of course link with other relevant national strategies, such as the Public Health Agency of Canada’s dementia strategy.
Canada’s choice
Any recommendations and all reform and redesign of the residential LTC sector must recognize and place at the core of all thinking and action that these settings are home for their residents. In most cases, their last home. Quality of life and death must not be sacrificed with neglect, when regulation is reasonable and warranted. They must also not be sacrificed with rigid over-regulation when risk tolerance is warranted. Good social and health care means that older adults in nursing homes experience a good quality of life and a good death. These are indispensable ingredients of our duty to care in nursing homes and must be primary.
We have failed our older adults by not keeping pace with care demands, by assuming that care of the frail older adults in nursing homes is “just basic care” and anyone can do it with little or almost no training and education, by ignoring the highly gendered nature of nursing home care, by “holding the line” on resources. We have failed by believing that the solution lies in a less than coherent approach to regulation—high regulation in some areas that may for example, infringe on individual rights and freedoms, and no regulation in others such as consistent education standards for direct care staff. Most shamefully, we have failed by not hearing the voices of older Canadians in their last phase of life. Canadian nursing homes had generally been able to “just manage”, something far from adequate before the pandemic.
Then came COVID-19, a shock wave that cracked wide all the pre-existing fractures in our nursing homes. It precipitated, in the worst circumstances, loss of life, along with high levels of physical, mental and emotional suffering for our older adults. Those unnecessarily lost lives had value. Those older adults deserved the last years of their lives and they deserved a good death. We failed them. We have a duty and a responsibility to fix this—not just to prepare for the second wave of COVID-19 and other future infectious diseases but a root-and-branch overhaul of the LTC sector that helped that crisis wreak such avoidable and tragic havoc. We can take steps to immediately begin restoring the trust we have broken. It’s a matter of choice.
Both the immediate and the long-term challenges in nursing homes and their solutions are complex. Comprehensive, integrated and evidence-informed change will take time. Many real and urgent priorities will appear and compete as action progresses. As a country we will be required to ask: “What choices are we willing to make so that none of us needs to fear the quality of life and care that may await us in a nursing home?” Breaking out of long-established patterns is hard and the easiest choice for many will be to not disrupt the status quo. To succeed to radically transform nursing homes we must lead with courage and resolve, making the necessary choices wisely.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the residents, families, LTC workers, and in particular those who died in nursing homes during the pandemic. They are why this report was written and why action is so urgent. The authors thank Cathy McPhalen, PhD, of thINK Editing Inc., Edmonton, Canada, for providing editorial and writing support that was funded by The Royal Society of Canada, in accordance with Good Publication Practice (GPP3) guidelines (ismpp.org/gpp3). The authors also thank the staff and trainees who supported this work in the Translating Research in Elder Care Program (University of Alberta) and at the Nova Scotia Centre on Aging (Mount Saint Vincent’s University).
References
2nd Canadian Division and Joint Task Force (East). 2020. Observations sur les Centres D’Hebergement de soins Longues Durees de Montreal. 2nd Canadian Division and Joint Task Force (East), Montreal, Quebec [online]: Available from cdn-contenu.quebec.ca/cdn-contenu/sante/documents/Problemes_de_sante/covid-19/Rapport_FAC/Observation_FAC_CHSLD.pdf?1590587216.
4th Canadian Division Joint Task Force (Central). 2020. Op Laser—JTFC observations in long term care facilities in Ontario. 4th Canadian Division Joint Task Force (Central), Toronto, Ontario [online]: Available from macleans.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/JTFC-Observations-in-LTCF-in-ON.pdf.
Abraham J, Kupfer R, and Behncke A. 2019. Implementation of a multicomponent intervention to prevent physical restraints in nursing homes (IMPRINT): a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 96: 27–34.
Abrams HR, Loomer L, Gandhi A, and Grabowski DC. 2020. Characteristics of U.S. nursing homes with COVID-19 cases. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.
Ågotnes G, McGregor MJ, Lexchin J, Doupe MB, Müller B, and Harrington C. 2019. An international mapping of medical care in nursing homes. Health Services Insights, 12: 1–12.
Aiken LH, and Sloane DM. 2020. Nurses matter: more evidence. BMJ Quality & Safety, 29: 1–3.
Alzheimer Society of Canada. 2016. Prevalence and monetary costs of dementia in Canada. The Alzheimer Society of Canada in Collaboration with the Public Health Agency of Canada, Toronto, Ontario [online]: Available from alzheimer.ca/sites/default/files/files/national/statistics/prevalenceandcostsofdementia_en.pdf.
Alzheimer Society of Canada. 2020. COVID 19 and Dementia Task Force [online]: Available from alzheimer.ca/en/Home/Living-with-dementia/managing-through-covid-19/covid-19-and-dementia-task-force.
Alzheimer’s Disease International. 2015. World Alzheimer Report 2015, the global impact of dementia: an analysis of prevalence, incidence, cost and trends. Alzheimer’s Disease International, London, UK.
Anderson RA, Issel LM, and McDaniel RR Jr. 2003. Nursing homes as complex adaptive systems: relationship between management practice and resident outcomes. Nursing Research, 52: 12–21.
Armitage R, and Nellums LB. 2020. COVID-19 and the consequences of isolating the elderly. The Lancet Public Health, 5: e256.
Armstrong P. 2020. The Re-imagining Long-term Residential Care project seeks to identify promising practices for thinking about, planning and organizing long-term residential care [online]: Available from reltc.apps01.yorku.ca/.
Armstrong P, and Armstrong H. 2020. The privatization of care: the case of nursing homes. Routledge.
Armstrong P, and Baines D. 2018. Promising practices in long term care: can work organisation treat both residents and providers with dignity and respect? Social Work & Policy Studies: Social Justice, Practice and Theory, 1(1): 1–26.
Armstrong P, and Baines D. 2019. Promising practices in long-term care: ideas worth sharing [online]: Available from policyalternatives.ca/sites/default/files/uploads/publications/National%20Office/2015/12/Promising%20Practices_online.pdf.
Armstrong P, Armstrong J, and Choiniere J. 2020. Re-imaging long-term residential care in the COVID-19 crisis. Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, Ottawa, Ontario [online]: Available from policyalternatives.ca/sites/default/files/uploads/publications/National%20Office/2020/04/Reimagining%20residential%20care%20COVID%20crisis.pdf.
Association of Canadian Community Colleges (ACCC). 2012. Canadian educational standards for personal care providers: environmental scan. ACCC, Ottawa, Ontario [online]: Available from collegesinstitutes.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Canadian-Standards-Environmental-Scan.pdf.
Aung KT, Nurumal MS, Wan N, Syakihar N, and Bukhari W. 2020. Loneliness among elderly in nursing homes. International Journal for Studies on Children, Women, Elderly and Disabled, 2: 72–78.
Backhaus R, Verbeek H, and Van Rossum E. 2014. Nurse staffing impact on quality of care in nursing homes: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 15: 383–393.
Banerjee S. 2009. The use of antipsychotic medication for people with dementia: time for action. Department of Health [online]: Available from jcpmh.info/wp-content/uploads/time-for-action.pdf.
Baughman RA, and Smith KE. 2012. Labor mobility of the direct care workforce: implications for the provision of long-term care. Health Economics, 21: 1402–1415.
BBC News. 2020. New Zealand’s first Covid cases in 24 days came from UK [online]: Available from bbc.com/news/world-asia-53059633.
BC Care Providers Association. 2019. Filling the gap: determining appropriate staffing & care levels for quality in long term care [online]: Available from bccare.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Filling-the-Gap-March-2019.pdf.
Bernabei R, Gambassi G, Lapane K, Landi F, Gatsonis C, Dunlop R, et al. 1998. Management of pain in elderly patients with cancer. Journal of the American Medical Association, 279: 1877–1882.
Bianchetti A, Rozzini R, Guerini F, Boffelli S, Ranieri P, Minelli G, et al. 2020. Clinical presentation of COVID19 in dementia patients. The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging, 24: 560–562.
Boscart VM, Sidani S, and Poss J. 2018. The associations between staffing hours and quality of care indicators in long-term care. BMC Health Services Research, 18: 750.
Bostick JE, Rantz MJ, Flesner MK, and Riggs CJ. 2006. Systematic review of studies of staffing and quality in nursing homes. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 7: 366–376.
Bourbonnais A, and Ducharme F. 2015. The social positioning of older people living with Alzheimer’s disease who scream in long-term care homes. Dementia, 14: 751–768.
Bourbonnais A, Ducharme F, Landreville P, Michaud C, Gauthier MA, and Lavallée MH. 2020. An action research to optimize the well-being of older people in nursing homes: challenges and strategies for implementing a complex intervention. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 39: 119–128.
Braedley S, Owusu P, Przednowek A, and Armstrong P. 2018. We’re told, ‘Suck it up’: long-term care workers’ psychological health and safety. Ageing International, 43: 91–109.
Brewster M, and Kapelos V. 2020. Military alleges horrific conditions, abuse in pandemic-hit Ontario nursing homes. CBC News [online]: Available from cbc.ca/news/politics/long-term-care-pandemic-covid-coronavirus-trudeau-1.5584960.
Brooks SK, Webster RK, Smith LE, Woodland L, Wessely S, Greenberg N, et al. 2020. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. The Lancet, 395: 912–920.
Brotman S, Ryan B, and Cormier R. 2003. The health and social service needs of gay and lesbian elders and their families in Canada. The Gerontologist, 43: 192–202.
Burns A, and Winblad B. 2006. Depression in severe dementia. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Butler P. 2020. Protective equipment being diverted from care homes to hospitals, say bosses. The Guardian [online]: Available from theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/30/protective-equipment-being-diverted-from-care-homes-to-hospitals-say-bosses.
Carrière Y, Keefe J, Légaré J, Lin X, and Rowe G. 2007. Population aging and immediate family composition: implications for future home care services. Genus, 63: 11–31.
Caspar S. 2014. The influence of information exchange processes on the provision of person-centred care in residential care facilities. Ph.D. thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia [online]: Available from open.library.ubc.ca/cIRcle/collections/ubctheses/24/items/1.0103402.
Castle NG. 2008. Nursing home caregiver staffing levels and quality of care: a literature review. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 27: 375–405.
Castle NG. 2012. Reviewing the evidence base for nurse staffing and quality of care in nursing homes. Evidence-Based Nursing, 15: 23–24.
Castle NG, and Engberg J. 2009. The health consequences of using physical restraints in nursing homes. Medical Care, 47(11): 1164–1173.
CBC News. 2020a. Another death at Northwood brings Nova Scotia’s COVID-19 fatalities to 58 [online]: Available from cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/covid-19-death-northwood-1.5578630.
CBC News. 2020b. Bodies of coronavirus victims found in Spanish nursing homes [online]: Available from cbc.ca/news/world/spanish-nursing-homes-bodies-1.5508523.
CBC News. 2020c. Labour group calls for premium wage increase for personal support workers [online]: Available from cbc.ca/news/canada/kitchener-waterloo/covid-healthcare-psw-wages-1.5542464.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2020. Severe outcomes among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)—United States, February 12–March 16, 2020. MMWR and Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, D.C. [online]: Available from cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6912e2.htm.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. 2001. Report to Congress: appropriateness of minimum nurse staffing ratios in nursing homes. Phase II, final report. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Baltimore, Maryland [online]: Available from phinational.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Phase_I_VOL-_II-1.pdf.
Chamberlain SA, Gruneir A, Hoben M, Squires JE, Cummings GG, and Estabrooks CA. 2017. Influence of organizational context on nursing home staff burnout: a cross-sectional survey of care aides in Western Canada. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 71: 60–69.
Chamberlain SA, Baik S, and Estabrooks CA. 2018. Going it alone: a scoping review of unbefriended older adults. Canadian Journal on Aging, 37: 1–11.
Chamberlain SA, Duggleby W, Fast J, Teaster PB, and Estabrooks CA. 2019a. Incapacitated and alone: prevalence of unbefriended residents in Alberta long-term care homes. SAGE Open, 9(4): 1–7.
Chamberlain SA, Hoben M, Squires JE, Cummings GG, Norton PG, and Estabrooks CA. 2019b. Who is (still) looking after mom and dad? Few improvements in care aides’ quality-of-work life. Canadian Journal on Aging, 38: 35–50.
Chamberlain SA, Duggelby W, Teaster P, and Estabrooks CA. 2020. Characteristics and unmet care needs of unbefriended residents in long-term care: a qualitative interview study. Aging & Mental Health, 24: 659–667.
Cheung ENM, Benjamin S, Heckman G, Ho JM, Lee L, Sinha SK, et al. 2018. Clinical characteristics associated with the onset of delirium among long-term nursing home residents. BMC Geriatrics, 18: 39.
Chitayat D. 2009. Gender equality in caregiving: the United Nations response. UN Report. American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C. [online]: Available from apa.org/international/pi/2009/07/un-gender.
Choi NG, Ransom S, and Wyllie RJ. 2008. Depression in older nursing home residents: the influence of nursing home environmental stressors, coping, and acceptance of group and individual therapy. Aging & Mental Health, 12: 536–547.
CIHI. 2010. Turning the tide: a strategy for international leadership in the prevention and early treatment of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias. Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Ottawa, Ontario.
CIHI. 2013. When a nursing home is home: how do Canadian nursing homes measure up on quality? CIHI, Ottawa, Ontario [online]: Available from secure.cihi.ca/free_products/CCRS_QualityinLongTermCare_EN.pdf.
CIHI. 2017. Regulated nurses, 2016: indicators (XLSX). Table 6 Regulated nursing workforce employed in direct care, by place of work and profession, Canada, 2007 to 2016 [online]: Available from cihi.ca/en/access-data-reports/results?fs3%5B0%5D=geographies%3A707&fs3%5B1%5D=primary_theme%3A673&fs3%5B2%5D=primary_theme%3A677&query=&page=1.
CIHI. 2018. Access to palliative care in Canada. CIHI, Ottawa, Ontario [online]: Available from cihi.ca/sites/default/files/document/access-palliative-care-2018-en-web.pdf.
CIHI. 2020a. New analysis paints international picture of COVID-19’s long-term care impacts. CIHI, Ottawa, Ontario [online]: Available from emktg.cihi.ca/ViewEmail.aspx?em_key=08jafBPP2lXCQzTRLz6rSCxyfUk+dfkDpRYQwdGchCoOfLXGIWW6Y6UWEMHRnIQqp03BjiwW7pQ5bqfdhCmHXL3vARe3YTEE&em_source=html.
CIHI. 2020b. Palliative and end-of-life care, seniors living with dementia in Canada facing gap in palliative care [online]: Available from cihi.ca/en/dementia-in-canada/spotlight-on-dementia-issues/palliative-and-end-of-life-care.
CIHI. 2020c. Profile of residents in residential and hospital-based continuing care, 2018–2019. CIHI, Ottawa, Ontario [online]: Available from cihi.ca/en/profile-of-residents-in-residential-and-hospital-based-continuing-care-2018-2019.
CIHI. 2020d. Unpaid caregiver challenges and supports [online]: Available from cihi.ca/en/dementia-in-canada/unpaid-caregiver-challenges-and-supports.
Cipriani G, and Fiorino MD. 2020. Access to care for dementia patients suffering from COVID-19. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 28(7): 796–797.
Comas-Herrera A, Ashcroft EC, and Lorenz-Dant K. 2020a. International examples of measures to prevent and manage COVID-19 outbreaks in residential care and nursing home settings. International Long Term Care Policy Network [online]: Available from ltccovid.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/International-measures-to-prevent-and-manage-COVID19-infections-in-care-homes-11-May-2.pdf.
Comas-Herrera A, Zalakain J, Litwin C, Hsu AT, Lemmon E, Henderson D, et al. 2020b. Mortality associated with COVID-19 outbreaks in care homes: early international evidence. International Long Term Care Policy Network [online]: Available from ltccovid.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Mortality-associated-with-COVID-21-May-5.pdf.
Cummings GG, Doupe M, Ginsburg L, McGregor MJ, Norton PG, and Estabrooks CA. 2017. Development and validation of A Scheduled Shifts Staffing (ASSiST) measure of unit-level staffing in nursing homes. The Gerontologist, 57: 509–516.
Daly T, and Szebehely M. 2012. Unheard voices, unmapped terrain: care work in long-term residential care for older people in Canada and Sweden. International Journal of Social Welfare, 21: 139–148.
D’Amours JK. 2020. Canada: how Quebec elder care homes became coronavirus hotspots. Aljazeera [online]: Available from aljazeera.com/indepth/features/canada-quebec-elder-care-homes-coronavirus-hotspots-200423214537289.html.
Declercq T, Petrovic M, Azermai M, Stichele RV, De Sutter AI, van Driel ML, et al. 2013. Withdrawal versus continuation of chronic antipsychotic drugs for behavioural and psychological symptoms in older people with dementia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, XX(3): CD007726.
Dellefield ME, Castle NG, McGilton KS, and Spilsbury K. 2015. The relationship between registered nurses and nursing home quality: an integrative review (2008–2014). Nursing Economics, 33(2): 95–108, 116.
Diamantis S, Noel C, Tarteret P, Vignier N, Gallien S, and Groupe de Recherche et d’Etude des Maladies Infectieuses—Paris Sud-Est (GREMLIN Paris Sud-Est). 2020. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-related deaths in French long-term care facilities: the “confinement disease” is probably more deleterious than the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) itself. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 21(7): 989–990.
DiManno R. 2020. The military’s report details the horrors of Ontario long-term-care homes. Shame on all of us for letting it happen. The Star [online]: Available from thestar.com/opinion/star-columnists/2020/05/26/the-militarys-report-details-the-horrors-of-long-term-care-homes-shame-on-all-of-us-for-letting-it-happen.html.
Dingfield LE, Brooks MK, O’Keefe D, Uy J, Vanston VJ, and O’Connor N. 2020. Palliative care pandemic support for long-term care. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 23(7): 890–891.
Donner G, Amodeo J, Armstrong H, and Armstrong P. 2012. Long-term care task force on resident care and safety. An action plan to address abuse and neglect in long-term care homes [online]: Available from eapon.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/LTCFTReportEnglish.pdf.
Donner G, Fooks C, and McReynolds J. 2015. Bringing care home. Report of the Expert Group on Home & Community Care. Minister of Health and Long-Term Care, Toronto, Ontario [online]: Available from health.gov.on.ca/en/public/programs/lhin/docs/hcc_report.pdf.
Dorman K, Pellizzari R, Rachlis M, and Green S. 2013. Why poverty is a medical problem. Ontario Medical Review, 80: 15–19.
Dosa D, Jump RL, LaPlante K, and Gravenstein S. 2020. Long-term care facilities and the coronavirus epidemic: practical guidelines for a population at highest risk. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 21: 569–571.
Doupe MB, St. John P, Chateau D, Strang D, Smele S, Bozat-Emre S, et al. 2012. Profiling the multidimensional needs of new nursing home residents: evidence to support planning. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 13: 487.e9–487.e17.
Drageset J, Corbett A, Selbaek G, and Husebo BS. 2014. Cancer-related pain and symptoms among nursing home residents: a systematic review. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 48: 699–710.e1.
Ducharme F. 2014. Psychoeducational interventions for family caregivers of seniors across their life trajectory: an evidence-based research program to inform clinical practice. Advances in Geriatrics, 2014: 316203.
Ducharme F, Lachance L, Lévesque L, Zarit SH, and Kergoat MJ. 2015. Maintaining the potential of a psycho-educational program: efficacy of a booster session after an intervention offered family caregivers at disclosure of a relative’s dementia diagnosis. Aging & Mental Health, 19: 207–216.
Ducharme F, Lachance L, Kergoat MJ, Coulombe R, Antoine P, and Pasquier F. 2016. A comparative descriptive study of characteristics of early- and late-onset dementia family caregivers. American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease & Other Dementias, 31: 48–56.
Duncan JG, Bott MJ, Thompson SA, and Gajewski BJ. 2009. Symptom occurrence and associated clinical factors in nursing home residents with cancer. Research in Nursing & Health, 32: 453–464.
Easton T, Milte R, Crotty M, and Ratcliffe J. 2016. Advancing aged care: a systematic review of economic evaluations of workforce structures and care processes in a residential care setting. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 14: 12.
Eaton J. 2020. Nursing home workers face coronavirus with low pay, inadequate protection. AARP, Washington, D.C. [online]: Available from aarp.org/caregiving/health/info-2020/nursing-home-workers-during-coronavirus.html.
Engberg J, Castle N, and McCaffrey D. 2008. Physical restraint initiation in nursing homes and subsequent resident health. The Gerontologist, 48: 442–452.
Ersek M, Nash PV, Hilgeman MM, Neradilek MB, Herr KA, Block PR, et al. 2020. Pain patterns and treatment among nursing home residents with moderate-severe cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 68: 794–802.
Estabrooks CA, Midodzi WK, Cummings GG, Ricker KL, and Giovannetti P. 2005. The impact of hospital nursing characteristics on 30-day mortality. Nursing Research, 54: 74–84.
Estabrooks CA, Poss JW, Squires JE, Teare GF, Morgan DG, Stewart N, et al. 2013. A profile of residents in prairie nursing homes. Canadian Journal on Aging, 32: 223–231.
Estabrooks CA, Hoben M, Poss JW, Chamberlain SA, Thompson GN, Silvius JL, et al. 2015a. Dying in a nursing home: treatable symptom burden and its link to modifiable features of work context. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 16: 515–520.
Estabrooks CA, Squires JE, Carleton HL, Cummings GG, and Norton PG. 2015b. Who is looking after mom and dad? Unregulated workers in Canadian long-term care homes. Canadian Journal on Aging, 34: 47–59.
Estabrooks CA, Flood C, and Straus S. 2020. We must act now to prevent a second wave of long-term care deaths. The Globe and Mail [online]: Available from theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-we-must-act-now-to-prevent-a-second-wave-of-long-term-care-deaths/.
Feinstein C. 2020. 42 more coronavirus deaths, 170 outbreaks in Ontario long-term care homes. DH News Toronto [online]: Available from dailyhive.com/toronto/ontario-long-term-care-homes-coronavirus-cases-deaths.
Feldman HH, and Estabrooks CA. 2017. The Canadian dementia challenge: ensuring optimal care and services for those at risk or with dementia throughout the country. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 108: e95–e97.
Flaherty JH. 2004. Urinary incontinence and the terminally ill older person. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, 20: 467–475.
Flood CM, MacDonnell V, and Philpott J. 2020. Vulnerable: the policy, law and ethics of COVID-19. University of Ottawa Press, Ottawa, Ontario.
Foebel AD, Onder G, Finne-Soveri H, Brandi V, Bernabei R, and Liperoti R. 2016. Physical restraint and antipsychotic medication use among nursing home residents with dementia. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 17: 184.e9–184.e14.
Forbes-Thompson S, Leiker T, and Bleich MR. 2007. High-performing and low-performing nursing homes: a view from complexity science. Health Care Management Review, 32: 341–351.
Fornaro M, Solmi M, Stubbs B, Veronese N, Monaco F, Novello S, et al. 2020. Prevalence and correlates of major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia among nursing home residents without dementia: systematic review and meta-analysis. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 216: 6–15.
Gavin-Dreschnack D, Schonfeld L, Nelson A, and Luther S. 2005. Development of a screening tool for safe wheelchair seating. In Advances in patient safety: from research to implementation (volume 4: programs, tools, and products). Edited by K Henriksen, JB Battles, ES Marks, and DI Lewin. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US), Rockville, Maryland. pp. 127–137.
Geng F, Stevenson DG, and Grabowski DC. 2019. Daily nursing home staffing levels highly variable, often below CMS expectations. Health Affairs, 38: 1095–1100.
Getliffe KA. 2008. Urinary catheter use in older people. Aging Health, 4: 181–189.
Giesbrecht EM, Smith EM, Mortenson B, and Miller WC. 2017. Needs for mobility devices, home modifications and personal assistance among Canadians with disabilities. Statistics Canada [online]: Available from www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/82-003-x/2017008/article/54852-eng.htm.
Givens JL, Selby K, Goldfeld KS, and Mitchell SL. 2012. Hospital transfers of nursing home residents with advanced dementia. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 60: 905–909.
Government of Alberta. n.d. Occupations in Alberta: health care aide [online]: Available from alis.alberta.ca/occinfo/occupations-in-alberta/occupation-profiles/health-care-aide/.
Government of Canada. 2004. Long-term facilities-based care [online]: Available from canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/home-continuing-care/long-term-facilities-based-care.html.
Grabowski DC, Aschbrenner KA, Rome VF, and Bartels SJ. 2010. Review: Quality of mental health care for nursing home residents: a literature review. Medical Care Research and Review, 67: 627–656.
Graham-McLay C. 2020. New Zealand drops Covid-19 restrictions after nation declared ‘virus-free’. The Guardian [online]: Available from theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/08/new-zealand-abandons-covid-19-restrictions-after-nation-declared-no-cases.
Gurwitz JH, DuBeau C, Mazor K, Sreedhara M, Lemay C, Spenard A, et al. 2016. Use of indwelling urinary catheters in nursing homes: implications for quality improvement efforts. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 64: 2204–2209.
Gurwitz JH, Bonner A, and Berwick DM. 2017. Reducing excessive use of antipsychotic agents in nursing homes. Journal of the American Medical Association, 318: 118–119.
Haaksma ML, Leoutsakos JS, Bremer JA, Aalten P, Ramakers IH, Verhey FR, et al. 2018. The clinical course and interrelations of dementia related symptoms. International Psychogeriatrics, 30: 859–866.
Hager M. 2020. How the coronavirus took North Vancouver’s Lynn Valley Care Centre. The Globe and Mail [online]: Available from theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-how-the-coronavirus-took-north-vancouvers-lynn-valley-care-centre/.
Hall P, Schroder C, and Weaver L. 2002. The last 48 hours of life in long-term care: a focused chart audit. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 50: 501–506.
Hanson LC, Eckert KJ, Dobbs D, Williams CS, Caprio AJ, Sloane PD, et al. 2008. Symptom experience of dying long-term care residents. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 56: 91–98.
Hanson LC, Ersek M, Lin FC, and Carey TS. 2013. Outcomes of feeding problems in advanced dementia in a nursing home population. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 61: 1692–1697.
Harrington C, Schnelle JF, McGregor M, and Simmons SF. 2016. The need for higher minimum staffing standards in U.S. nursing homes. Health Services Insights, 9: 13–19.
Harrington C, Dellefield ME, Halifax E, Fleming ML, and Bakerjian D. 2020. Appropriate nurse staffing levels for U.S. nursing homes. Health Services Insights, 13: 1–14.
Health Quality Ontario. 2020. Wait times for long-term care homes [online]: Available from hqontario.ca/System-Performance/Long-Term-Care-Home-Performance/Wait-Times.
Henderson J. 2020. No “pandemic premium” for Nova Scotia health care workers. Halifax Examiner [online]: Available from halifaxexaminer.ca/province-house/no-pandemic-premium-for-nova-scotia-health-care-workers/.
Hendriks SA, Smalbrugge M, Galindo-Garre F, Hertogh C, and Van der Steen J. 2015. From admission to death: prevalence and course of pain, agitation, and shortness of breath, and treatment of these symptoms in nursing home residents with dementia. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 16: 475–481.
Hewko SJ, Cooper SL, Huynh H, Spiwek TL, Carleton HL, Reid S, et al. 2015. Invisible no more: a scoping review of the health care aide workforce literature. BMC Nursing, 14: 38.
Hirdes JP, Mitchell L, Maxwell CJ, and White N. 2011. Beyond the ‘iron lungs of gerontology’: using evidence to shape the future of nursing homes in Canada. Canadian Journal on Aging, 30: 371–390.
Hoben M, Chamberlain SA, Knopp-Sihota JA, Poss JW, Thompson GN, and Estabrooks CA. 2016. Impact of symptoms and care practices on nursing home residents at the end of life: a rating by front-line care providers. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 17: 155–161.
Hoben M, Knopp-Sihota JA, Nesari M, Chamberlain SA, Squires JE, Norton PG, et al. 2017. Health of health care workers in Canadian nursing homes and pediatric hospitals: a cross-sectional study. CMAJ Open, 5: E791–E799.
Hoben M, Chamberlain SA, Gruneir A, Knopp-Sihota J, Sutherland J, Poss JW, et al. 2019a. Nursing home length of stay in 3 Canadian health regions: temporal trends, jurisdictional differences, and associated factors. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 20: 1121–1128.
Hoben M, Heninger A, Holroyd-Leduc J, Knopp-Sihota J, Estabrooks CA, and Goodarzi Z. 2019b. Depressive symptoms in long term care facilities in Western Canada: a cross sectional study. BMC Geriatrics, 19: 335.
Hoben M, Yoon MN, Lu L, and Estabrooks CA. 2020. If we cannot measure it, we cannot improve it: understanding measurement problems in routine oral/dental assessments in Canadian nursing homes—Part I. Gerodontology, 37(2): 153–163.
Holroyd-Leduc JM, and Laupacis A. 2020. Continuing care and COVID-19: a Canadian tragedy that must not be allowed to happen again. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 192: e632–e633.
Hsu AT, Berta W, Coyte PC, and Laporte A. 2016. Staffing in Ontario’s long-term care homes: differences by profit status and chain ownership. Canadian Journal on Aging, 35: 175–189.
Hsu AT, Lane N, Sinha SK, Dunning J, Dhuper M, Kahiel Z, et al. 2020. Impact of COVID-19 on residents of Canada’s long-term care homes—ongoing challenges and policy responses. International Long Term Care Policy Network [online]: Available from ltccovid.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/LTCcovid-country-reports_Canada_June-4-2020.pdf.
Humphrey HH. 1977. Remarks at the dedication of the Hubert H. Humphrey Building. November 4. Congressional Record, 123: 37287.
Hunnicutt JN, Ulbricht CM, Tjia J, and Lapane KL. 2017. Pain and pharmacologic pain management in long-stay nursing home residents. Pain, 158: 1091–1099.
Hunt LJ, Stephens CE, and Smith AK. 2020. Palliative care in the nursing home—shifting paradigms. JAMA Internal Medicine, 180: 243–244.
Hyer K, Thomas KS, Branch LG, Harman JS, Johnson CE, and Maldonado R. 2011. The influence of nurse staffing levels on quality of care in nursing homes. The Gerontologist, 51: 610–616.
interRAI. 2020. Long-term care facilities (LTCF) [online]: Available from interrai.org/long-term-care-facilities.html.
Johns Hopkins University Coronavirus Resource Center. 2020. How does mortality differ across countries? [online]: Available from coronavirus.jhu.edu/data/mortality.
Jokanovic N, Tan EC, Dooley MJ, Kirkpatrick CM, and Bell JS. 2015. Prevalence and factors associated with polypharmacy in long-term care facilities: a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 16: 535.e1–535.e12.
Juola AL, Pylkkanen S, Kautiainen H, Bell JS, Bjorkman MP, Finne-Soveri H, et al. 2016. Burden of potentially harmful medications and the association with quality of life and mortality among institutionalized older people. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 17: 276.e9–276.e14.
Kane RL. 2004. Commentary: nursing home staffing more is necessary but not necessarily sufficient. Health Services Research, 39: 251–256.
Keefe J, Smith CA, and Archibald G. 2018. Minister’s Expert Advisory Panel on long-term care: recommendations. Queen’s Printer for Ontario [online]: Available from novascotia.ca/dhw/publications/Minister-Expert-Advisory-Panel-on-Long-Term-Care.pdf.
Keller HH, Carrier N, Slaughter SE, Lengyel C, Steele CM, Duizer L, et al. 2017. Prevalence and determinants of poor food intake of residents living in long-term care. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 18: 941–947.
Kelly C, and Bourgeault IL. 2015. The personal support worker program standard in Ontario: an alternative to self-regulation? Healthcare Policy, 11: 20–26.
Kim H. 2020. The impact of COVID-19 on long-term care in South Korea and measures to address it. International Long Term Policy Network [online]: Available from ltccovid.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/The-Long-Term-Care-COVID19-situation-in-South-Korea-7-May-2020.pdf.
Kirkup K. 2020. Canadian military releases ‘deeply disturbing’ report on Ontario long-term care facilities. The Globe and Mail [online]: Available from theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-trudeau-ford-discuss-deeply-disturbing-canadian-forces-report-on/.
Koller D, Schön G, Schäfer I, Glaeske G, van den Bussche H, and Hansen H. 2014. Multimorbidity and long-term care dependency—a five-year follow-up. BMC Geriatrics, 14: 70.
Köpke S, Mühlhauser I, Gerlach A, Haut A, Haastert B, Möhler R, et al. 2012. Effect of a guideline-based multicomponent intervention on use of physical restraints in nursing homes: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 307: 2177–2184.
Kröger E, Wilchesky M, Marcotte M, Voyer P, Morin M, Champoux N, et al. 2015. Medication use among nursing home residents with severe dementia: identifying categories of appropriateness and elements of a successful intervention. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 16: 629.e1–629.e17.
Kua EH, Ho E, Tan HH, Tsoi C, Thng C, and Mahendran R. 2014. The natural history of dementia. Psychogeriatrics, 14: 196–201.
Kuske B, Hanns S, and Luck T. 2007. Nursing home staff training in dementia care: a systematic review of evaluated programs. International Psychogeriatrics, 19: 818–841.
Lachance CC, Jurkowski MP, Dymarz AC, Robinovitch SN, Feldman F, Laing AC, et al. 2017. Compliant flooring to prevent fall-related injuries in older adults: a scoping review of biomechanical efficacy, clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and workplace safety. PLoS ONE, 12: e0171652.
Lai CC, Wang JH, Ko WC, Yen MY, Lu MC, Lee CM, et al. 2020a. COVID-19 in long-term care facilities: an upcoming threat that cannot be ignored. Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection, 53: 444–446.
Lai J, Ma S, and Wang Y. 2020b. Factors associated with mental health outcomes among health care workers exposed to coronavirus disease 2019. JAMA Network Open, 3: e203976.
Lapierre M. 2020. Military preparing report on conditions at Quebec’s CHSLDs. Montreal Gazette [online]: Available from montrealgazette.com/news/local-news/an-inquiry-has-been-launched-into-covid-19s-toll-on-seniors-residences.
Lee J. 2020. Nurses allege lack of cleaning and isolation contributed to deadly COVID-19 outbreak at Calgary care home. CBC News [online]: Available from cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/covid-19-revera-mckenzie-towne-calgary-nurses-1.5527550.
Lessard L, Michalowski W, Fung-Kee-Fung M, Jones L, and Grudniewicz A. 2017. Architectural frameworks: defining the structures for implementing learning health systems. Implementation Science, 12: 78.
Li Q, Zheng N, and Temkin-Greene H. 2013. Quality of end-of-life care of long-term nursing home residents with and without dementia. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 61: 1066–1073.
Lindroos E, Saarela RK, Suominen MH, Muurinen S, and Soini H. 2019. Burden of oral symptoms and its associations with nutrition, well-being, and survival among nursing home residents. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 20: 537–543.
Low L. 2020. The long-term care COVID-19 situation in Australia. International Long Term Care Policy Network [online]: Available from ltccovid.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Australia-LTC-COVID19-situation-24-April-2020.pdf.
MacDonald BJ, Wolfson M, and Hirdes JP. 2019. The future co$t of long-term care in Canada. National Institute on Ageing, Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario [online]: Available from static1.squarespace.com/static/5c2fa7b03917eed9b5a436d8/t/5dbadf6ce6598c340ee6978f/1572527988847/The+Future+Cost+of+Long-Term+Care+in+Canada.pdf.
MacDonald M. 2015. Regulating individual charges for long-term residential care in Canada. Studies in Political Economy, 95: 83–114.
Mallidou AA, Cummings GG, Schalm C, and Estabrooks CA. 2013. Health care aides use of time in a residential long-term care unit: a time and motion study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 50: 1229–1239.
Martín-Pérez M, Ruigómez A, Pastor-Barriuso R, López FJ, Villaverde-Hueso A, and Damián J. 2019. Number of medications and mortality among residents in nursing homes. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 20: 643–645.
Mazur A. 2020. Kingston’s long-term care COVID-19 inspection initiative a ‘big win’: public health. Global News [online]: Available from globalnews.ca/news/6859843/kingstons-long-term-care-covid-19-inspections/.
McCarthy EP, Ogarek JA, Loomer L, Gozalo PL, Mor V, Hamel MB, et al. 2020. Hospital transfer rates among US nursing home residents with advanced illness before and after initiatives to reduce hospitalizations. JAMA Internal Medicine, 180: 385–394.
McGilton KS, Sorin-Peters R, Sidani S, Rochon E, Boscart V, and Fox M. 2011. Focus on communication: increasing the opportunity for successful staff-patient interactions. International Journal of Older People Nursing, 6: 13–24.
McGilton KS, Sorin-Peters R, Rochon E, Boscart V, Fox M, Chu CH, et al. 2018. The effects of an interprofessional patient-centered communication intervention for patients with communication disorders. Applied Nursing Research, 39: 189–194.
McGilton KS, Escrig-Pinol A, Gordon A, Chu CH, Zúñiga F, Sanchez MG, et al. 2020. Uncovering the devaluation of nursing home staff during COVID-19: are we fuelling the next health care crisis? Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 21(7): 962–965.
McGregor MJ, Tate RB, Ronald LA, and McGrail K. 2007. Variation in site of death among nursing home residents in British Columbia, Canada. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 10: 1128–1136.
McGregor MJ, Tate RB, Ronald LA, McGrail KM, Cox MB, Berta W, et al. 2010. Trends in long-term care staffing by facility ownership in British Columbia, 1996 to 2006. Health Reports, 21: 27–33.
McHugh MD, Rochman MF, Sloane DM, Berg RA, Mancini ME, Nadkarni VM, et al. 2016. Better nurse staffing and nurse work environments associated with increased survival of in-hospital cardiac arrest patients. Medical Care, 54: 74–80.
McIntosh CN, Finès P, Wilkins R, and Wolfson M. 2009. Income disparities in health-adjusted life expectancy for Canadian adults, 1991 to 2001. Statistics Canada [online]: Available from www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/82-003-X200900411019.
Menec VH, Nowicki S, Blandford A, and Veselyuk D. 2009. Hospitalizations at the end of life among long-term care residents. The Journals of Gerontology: Series A, 64A: 395–402.
Mitchell SL. 2015. Care of patients with advanced dementia [online]: Available from uptodate.com/contents/palliative-care-of-patients-with-advanced-dementia.
Mitchell SL, Kiely DK, and Hamel MB. 2004. Dying with advanced dementia in the nursing home. Archives of Internal Medicine, 164: 321–326.
Mitchell SL, Teno JM, Kiely DK, Shaffer ML, Jones RN, Prigerson HG, et al. 2009. The clinical course of advanced dementia. The New England Journal of Medicine, 361: 1529–1538.
Mitchell SL, Mor V, Gozalo PL, Servadio JL, and Teno JM. 2016. Tube feeding in US nursing home residents with advanced dementia, 2000–2014. Journal of the American Medical Association, 316: 769–770.
Mount Saint Vincent University. 2020a. Janice Keefe [online]: Available from msvu.ca/academics/bachelor-of-arts-ba/family-studies/meet-our-faculty/janice-keefe/.
Mount Saint Vincent University. 2020b. Seniors—Adding Life to Years (SALTY) [online]: Available from msvu.ca/research-at-the-mount/research-chairs/centres-and-institutes/nova-scotia-centre-on-aging/projects/current-projects/seniors-adding-life-to-years-salty/.
Müller B, Armstrong P, and Lowndes R. 2018. Cleaning and caring: contributions in long-term residential care. Ageing International, 43: 53–73.
Muthalagappan S, Brown EA, Johansson L, Kong WM, and Brown EA. 2013. Dialysis or conservative care for frail older patients: ethics of shared decision-making. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 28: 2717–2722.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Social isolation and loneliness in older adults: opportunities for the health care system. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.
National Center on Caregiving at Family Caregiver Alliance. 2003. Women and caregiving: facts and figures [online]: Available from caregiver.org/women-and-caregiving-facts-and-figures.
National Institute on Ageing. 2019. Enabling the future provision of long-term care in Canada. National Institute on Ageing White Paper, Toronto, Ontario [online]: Available from static1.squarespace.com/static/5c2fa7b03917eed9b5a436d8/t/5d9de15a38dca21e46009548/1570627931078/Enabling+the+Future+Provision+of+Long-Term+Care+in+Canada.pdf.
National Records of Scotland. 2020. Deaths involving coronavirus (COVID-19) in Scotland, Weeks 25 (15 to 21 June 2020). National Records of Scotland [online]: Available from nrscotland.gov.uk/files//statistics/covid19/covid-deaths-report-week-25.pdf.
OECD. 2011a. The impact of caring on family carers. In Help wanted? Providing and paying for long-term care. OECD Health Policy Studies. OECD Publishing, Paris, France [online]: Available from oecd.org/els/health-systems/47884865.pdf.
OECD. 2011b. Long-term care: growing sector, multifaceted systems. In Help wanted? Providing and paying for long-term care. OECD Health Policy Studies. OECD Publishing, Paris, France [online]: Available from oecd.org/els/health-systems/47884520.pdf.
Office of Inspector General. 2002. State nurse aide training: program information and data. Office of Evaluation and Inspections, Washington, D.C.
Office of the Seniors Advocate. 2020. A billion reasons to care: a funding review of contracted long term care in B.C. [online]: Available from seniorsadvocatebc.ca/app/uploads/sites/4/2020/02/ABillionReasonsToCare.pdf.
Ontario Long Term Care Association. 2019. Sector dashboard—Ontario [online]: Available from oltca.com/OLTCA/Documents/SectorDashboards/ON.pdf.
Ouslander JG. 2020. Coronavirus disease19 in geriatrics and long-term care: an update. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 68(5): 918–921.
Paque K, Bastiaens H, Van Bogaert P, and Dilles T. 2018. Living in a nursing home: a phenomenological study exploring residents’ loneliness and other feelings. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 32: 1477–1484.
Perlman C, Kirkjam J, Velkers C, Leung RH, Whitehead M, and Seitz D. 2019. Access to psychiatrist services for older adults in long-term care: a population-based study. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 20: 610–616.e2.
Perron LS, and Marquis M. 2020. The armed forces prepare a report on the CHSLDs in Quebec. La Presse [online]: Available from lapresse.ca/covid-19/202005/26/01-5275077-les-forces-armees-preparent-un-rapport-sur-les-chsld-du-quebec.php.
Public Health Agency of Canada. 2018. Dementia in Canada, including Alzheimer’s disease [online]: Available from cihi.ca/en/dementia-in-canada/how-dementia-impacts-canadians#ref1.
Rapaport P, Livingston G, Murray Jea, Mulla A, and Cooper C. 2017. Systematic review of the effective components of psychosocial interventions delivered by care home staff to people with dementia. BMJ Open, 7: e014177.
Research Institute for Aging. 2019. Living classroom implementation guide [online]: Available from the-ria.ca/resources/living-classroom-implementation-guide/.
Reynolds K, Henderson M, Schulman A, and Hanson LC. 2002. Needs of the dying in nursing homes. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 5: 895–901.
Ross N, Wolfson M, and Kaplan GA. 2009. Income inequality as a determinant of health. In Healthier societies: from analysis to action. Edited by J Heymann, C Hertzman, ML Barer, and RG Evans. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
Sawatsky R, Porterfield P, Roberts D, Lee J, Liang L, Reimer-Kirkham S, et al. 2017. Embedding a palliative approach in nursing care delivery: an integrated knowledge synthesis. Advances in Nursing Science, 40: 263–279.
Schneider LS, Tariot PN, Dagerman KS, Davis SM, Hsiao JK, Ismail MS, et al. 2006. Effectiveness of atypical antipsychotic drugs in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. The New England Journal of Medicine, 355: 1525–1538.
Schwinn SV, and Dinkel SA. 2015. Changing the culture of long-term care: combating heterosexism. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 20(2): 7.
Scoffield H. 2020. Race-based data could help save lives—if only Canada had more of it. The Star [online]: Available from thestar.com/politics/political-opinion/2020/05/26/race-based-data-could-help-save-lives-if-only-canada-had-more-of-it.html.
Seblega BK, Zhang NJ, Unruh LY, Breen GM, Paek SC, and Wan TT. 2010. Changes in nursing home staffing levels, 1997 to 2007. Medical Care Research and Review, 67: 232–246.
Seitz D, Purandare N, and Conn D. 2010. Prevalence of psychiatric disorders among older adults in long-term care homes: a systematic review. International Psychogeriatrics, 22: 1025–1039.
Simard J, and Volicer L. 2020. Loneliness and isolation in long-term care and the Covid-19 pandemic. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 21(7): 966–967.
Slaughter SE, Eliasziw M, Morgan D, and Drummond N. 2011. Incidence and predictors of excess disability in walking among nursing home residents with middle-stage dementia: a prospective cohort study. International Psychogeriatrics, 23: 54–64.
Slaughter SE, Wagg AS, Jones CA, Schopflocher D, Ickert C, Bampton E, et al. 2015. Mobility of vulnerable elders study: effect of the sit-to-stand activity on mobility, function, and quality of life. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 16: 138–143.
Song Y, Hoben M, Norton PG, and Estabrooks CA. 2020a. Association of work environment with missed and rushed care tasks among care aides in nursing homes. JAMA Network Open, 3(1): e1920092.
Song Y, Iaconi A, Chamberlain SA, Cummings GG, and Hoben M. 2020b. Pre-pandemic baseline: frontline workforce in nursing homes (under review).
Spilsbury K, Hewitt C, Stirk L, and Bowman C. 2011. The relationship between nurse staffing and quality of care in nursing homes: a systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 48: 732–750.
Squires JE, Hoben M, Linklater S, Carleton HL, Graham N, and Estabrooks CA. 2015. Job satisfaction among care aides in residential long-term care: a systematic review of contributing factors, both individual and organizational. Nursing Research and Practice, 2015: 157924.
Stajduhar KI. 2020. Provocations on privilege in palliative care: are we meeting our core mandate? Progress in Palliative Care, 28: 89–93.
Statistics Canada. 2006. Table 3: selected measures of nursing hours in long-term care facilities, by ownership, British Columbia, 1996 to 2006 [online]: Available from www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/82-003-x/2010004/article/11390/tbl/tbl3-eng.htm.
Statistics Canada. 2012. Census in brief: living arrangement of seniors. Statistics Canada, Ottawa, Ontario [online]: Available from www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/as-sa/98-312-x/98-312-x2011003_4-eng.pdf.
Statistics Canada. 2015. Same-sex couples and sexual orientation… by the numbers [online]: Available from statcan.gc.ca/eng/dai/smr08/2015/smr08_203_2015.
Statistics Canada. 2017a. Census in brief: dwellings in Canada. Statistics Canada, Ottawa, Ontario [online]: Available from www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2016/as-sa/98-200-x/2016005/98-200-x2016005-eng.pdf.
Statistics Canada. 2017b. A portrait of the population aged 85 and older in 2016 in Canada [online]: Available from www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2016/as-sa/98-200-x/2016004/98-200-x2016004-eng.pdf.
Statistics Canada. 2018. Seniors [online]: Available from www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/11-402-x/2011000/chap/seniors-aines/seniors-aines-eng.htm.
Statistics Canada. 2019. Changes in life expectancy by selected causes of death, 2017. Statistics Canada, Ottawa, Ontario [online]: Available from www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/190530/dq190530d-eng.htm.
Styr R, Hawryluck L, Robinson S, Kasapinovic S, Fones C, and Gold WL. 2008. Impact on health care workers employed in high-risk areas during the Toronto SARS outbreak. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 64: 177–183.
Tamura BK, Bell CL, Inaba M, and Masaki KH. 2012. Outcomes of polypharmacy in nursing home residents. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, 28: 217–236.
Tamura MK, Liu S, Montez-Rath ME, O’Hare AM, Hall YN, and Lorenz KA. 2017. Persistent gaps in use of advance directives among nursing home residents receiving maintenance dialysis. JAMA Internal Medicine, 177: 1204–1205.
Temkin-Greener H, Zheng N, Xing J, and Mukamel DB. 2013. Site of death among nursing home residents in the United States: changing patterns, 2003–2007. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 14: 741–748.
Teno JM, Gozalo PL, Bynum JP, Leland NE, Miller SC, Morden NE, et al. 2013. Change in end-of-life care for Medicare beneficiaries: site of death, place of care, and health care transitions in 2000, 2005, and 2009. Journal of the American Medical Association, 309: 470–477.
Thompson ND, Penna A, Eure TR, Bamberg WM, Barney G, Barter D, et al. 2020. Epidemiology of antibiotic use for urinary tract infection in nursing home residents. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 21: 91–96.
Tjepkema M, Wilkins R, and Long A. 2013. Cause-specific mortality by income adequacy in Canada: a 16-year follow-up study. Health Reports, 24: 14–22.
Toot S, Swinson T, Devine M, and Challis D. 2017. Causes of nursing home placement for older people with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Psychogeriatrics, 29: 195–208.
TREC. 2020. Translating Research in Elder Care [online]: Available from trecresearch.ca/.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2017. Find your path forward: how much care will you need? U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, D.C. [online]: Available from longtermcare.acl.gov/the-basics/how-much-care-will-you-need.html.
Van Houtven CH, DePasquale N, and Coe NB. 2020. Essential long-term care workers commonly hold second jobs and double- or triple-duty caregiving roles. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.
Van Nostrand J, Howe AL, Havens B, Bray D, and Van den Heuvel W. 1995. Overview of long-term care in five nations: Australia, Canada, the Netherlands, Norway, and the United States. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, D.C. [online]: Available from aspe.hhs.gov/basic-report/overview-long-term-care-five-nations-australia-canada-netherlands-norways-and-united-states.
Volicer L. 2004. End-of-life care in nursing homes: is the glass half empty or half full? Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 5: 217.
Wang H, Barbarino P, Gauthier S, Brodaty H, Molinuevo JL, Xie H, et al. 2020. Dementia care during COVID-19. The Lancet, 395(10231): 1190–1191.
Wick JY, and Zanni GR. 2007. Wheelchair-bound residents in nursing facilities: the basics. The Consultant Pharmacist, 22: 119–139.
Williams S, Zimmerman S, and Williams CS. 2012. Family caregiver involvement for long-term care residents at the end of life. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 67: 595–604.
Won AB, Lapane KL, Gambassi G, Bernabei R, Mor V, and Lipsitz LA. 1999. Correlates and management of nonmalignant pain in the nursing home. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 47: 936–942.
Won AB, Lapane KL, Vallow S, Schein JR, Morris J, and Lipsitz LA. 2004. Persistent nonmalignant pain and analgesic prescribing patterns in elderly nursing home resident. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 52: 867–874.
World Health Organization. 2020a. Q&A: influenza and COVID-19—similarities and differences [online]: Available from who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/question-and-answers-hub/q-a-detail/q-a-similarities-and-differences-covid-19-and-influenza?gclid=EAIaIQobChMIg5bTvsLk6QIV1CCtBh0MZAhPEAAYASAAEgKJM_D_BwE.
World Health Organization. 2020b. WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19—3 March 2020 [online]: Available from who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---3-march-2020.
Yinfei D, Iaconi A, and Song Y. 2020. Care aides working multiple jobs: considerations for staffing policies in long-term care homes during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association (submitted).
Yoon MN, Lu LL, Estabrooks CA, and Hoben M. 2020. If we cannot measure it, we cannot improve it: understanding measurement problems in routine oral/dental assessments in Canadian nursing homes—Part II. Gerodontology, 37(2): 164–176.
Zeller A, Hahn S, Needham I, Kok G, Dassen T, and Halfens RJ. 2009. Aggressive behavior of nursing home residents toward caregivers: a systematic literature review. Geriatric Nursing, 30: 174–187.
Supplementary materials
Supplementary Material 1 (DOCX 35.6 KB)
- Download
- 35.63 KB
Supplementary Material 2 (DOCX 41.3 KB)
- Download
- 41.40 KB
Supplementary Material 3 (DOCX 41.3 KB)
- Download
- 34.75 KB
Supplementary Material 4 (DOCX 25.6 KB)
- Download
- 25.69 KB
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
FACETS
Volume 5 • Number 1 • January 2020
Pages: 651 - 691
Editor: Jules M. Blais
History
Received: 19 July 2020
Accepted: 27 July 2020
Version of record online: 27 August 2020
Notes
This paper presents the results reported by the Long-Term Care Working Group established by the Royal Society of Canada as part of their Task Force on COVID-19. It underwent extensive internal review by the Royal Society of Canada and external review by the Editor-in-Chief of FACETS.
Copyright
© 2020 Estabrooks et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper.
Key Words
Sections
Subjects
Authors
Author Contributions
All conceived and designed the study.
CAE, PA, and JLS performed the experiments/collected the data.
All analyzed and interpreted the data.
CAE, CMF, and JK contributed resources.
CAE, SES, CMF, JK, and FD drafted or revised the manuscript.
Competing Interests
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Other Metrics
Citations
Cite As
Carole A. Estabrooks, Sharon E. Straus, Colleen M. Flood, Janice Keefe, Pat Armstrong, Gail J. Donner, Véronique Boscart, Francine Ducharme, James L. Silvius, and Michael C. Wolfson. 2020. Restoring trust: COVID-19 and the future of long-term care in Canada. FACETS.
5(1): 651-691. https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2020-0056
Export Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
1. An Intersectional Analysis of Moral Distress and Intention to Leave Employment Among Long-Term Care Providers in British Columbia
2. Long-term care staffs’ experience in facilitating the use of videoconferencing by cognitively impaired long-term care residents during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods study
3. Towards equitable representation in long-term residential care: widening the circle to ensure “essential voices” in research teams
4. “I would have to walk around to find the best Wi-Fi connection…”: qualitatively exploring challenges associated with rapid rollout of telehealth in Canadian long-term care homes
5. Canada needs a national COVID-19 inquiry now
6. Factors Affecting Managers’ Technology Adoption Decisions in Long-Term Care Homes: A Canadian Exploratory Study Post–COVID-19 Pandemic
7. The Impact of Physical Environment on Residents’ Well-Being and Staff Care Practice in Dementia Care Homes in Canada and the Netherlands
8. “I haven’t really gone through things like this”: Young long-term care workers’ experiences of working during the COVID-19 pandemic
9. Caregiving in long-term care before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review
10. Exploring space and practices of control in long-term residential care violence prevention strategies
11. At the Epicentre of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Canada: Experiences and Recommendations of Family Care Partners of an Older Person Living in a Long-Term Care Home
12. The Association of Nursing Homes’ Organizational Context With Care Aide Empowerment: A Cross-Sectional Study
13. Optimizing Older Adult Mental Health in Support of Healthy Ageing: A Pluralistic Framework to Inform Transformative Change across Community and Healthcare Domains
14. A cloud-based integration of Building Information Modeling and Virtual Reality through game engine to facilitate the design of Age-in-Place homes at the conceptual stage
15. Designing a virtual course for essential care partners (ECPs) in long-term care (LTC): a pre-implementation study
16. The Impact of Assisted Living Organizational Structure and Process Characteristics on Staff Absence During COVID-19
17. Family Involvement Training for Staff and Family Caregivers: Case Report on Program Design and Mixed Methods Evaluation
18. The Golden Ticket: Gaining In-Person Access to Relatives in Long-Term Care Homes During the COVID-19 Pandemic
19. Black-Abundance, Fat-Revolt, and Crip-Desire: Intersectionality as Interference in the Life and Death of Rohan Garfield Salmon
20. Application of Artificial intelligence in COVID-19-related geriatric care: A scoping review
21. Residents’ and spouses’ experiences of loneliness and depression after separation due to long-term care placement: a qualitative systematic review
22. Organizational Context and Quality Indicators in Nursing Homes: A Microsystem Look
23. Health Provider Experiences in Supporting Social Connectedness Between Families and Older Adults Living in Long-Term Care Homes
24. Soothing dementia carers: A pilot evaluation of an imagery-based wellbeing app feature to support family carers of people with dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic
25. Meme Science, Pandemic Preparedness, and the Trajectory of Failure
26. Developing a question prompt list for family caregivers concerning the progression and palliative care needs of nursing home residents living with dementia
27. Older Adults’ Quality of Life in Long-Term Care: A Cross-Sectional Comparison Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic
28. Policies that Support and Hinder Families as Partners in Care during COVID-19 Pandemic: Comparative Policy Learning from England, British Columbia, and the Netherlands
29. Registered Practical Nurses’ Experiences of the Moral Habitability of Long-Term Care Environments during the COVID-19 Pandemic
30. The association between frailty, long-term care home characteristics and COVID-19 mortality before and after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination: a retrospective cohort study
31. “I didn’t know it was going to be like this.”: unprepared for end-of-Life care, the experiences of care aides care in long-term care
32. Assessing the implementation of nurse practitioner-led huddles in long-term care using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)
33. Lessons learned from the experiences and perspectives of frontline healthcare workers on the COVID-19 response: a qualitative descriptive study
34. Characterizing worker compensation claims in long-term care and examining the association between facility characteristics and severe injury: a repeated cross-sectional study from Alberta, Canada
35. Resident Impact of the Single Site Order Restricting Staff Mobility across Long-Term Care Homes in British Columbia, Canada
36. Navigating Mealtimes to Meet Public Health Mandates in Long-Term Care During COVID-19: Staff Perspectives
37. Family Physicians’ Roles in Long-Term Care Homes and Other Congregate Residential Care Settings during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study
38. Canadian Long-Term Residential Care Staff Recommendations for Pandemic Preparedness and Workforce Mental Health
39. Promoting Resident Autonomy to Maintain Quality of Life
40. Implementation of the Single Site Order in Long-Term Care: What We Can Learn from Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
41. Long-Term Care Homes: Carceral Spaces in Times of Crisis or Perpetually?
42. The predictable crisis of covid-19 in Canada’s long term care homes
43. How Canada’s decentralised covid-19 response affected public health data and decision making
44. Use and misuse of research: Canada’s response to covid-19 and its health inequalities
45. Health Care Implications of the COVID-19 Pandemic for the Cardiovascular Practitioner
46. Culture Change in Long-Term Care-Post COVID-19: Adapting to a New Reality Using Established Ideas and Systems
47. “We’ve All Lost So Much”: The Long-Term Care Home Experiences of Essential Family Caregivers During COVID-19
48. Which has more influence on a family's assessment of the quality of dying of their long-term care resident with dementia: Frequency of symptoms or quality of communication with healthcare team?
49. Experiences of Healthcare Workers in Long-Term Care during COVID-19: A Scoping Review
50. COVID-19 pandemic in long-term care: An international perspective for policy considerations
51. Comparing Health Workforce Policy during a Major Global Health Crisis: A Critical Conceptual Debate and International Empirical Investigation
52. Trust as a key measure of quality and safety after the restriction of family contact in Canadian long-term care settings during the COVID-19 pandemic
53. Changes in Health and Well-Being of Nursing Home Managers from a Prepandemic Baseline in February 2020 to December 2021
54. What is the level of information technology maturity in Ontario’s long-term care homes? A cross-sectional survey study protocol
55. Education and training for infection prevention and control provided by long-term care homes to family caregivers: a scoping review protocol
56. Implementing and improving designated care partner programs in three Ontario long-term care homes
57. Corporate Social Responsibility in Bolivia: Hospital Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic
58. COVID-19: A Worldwide Hecatomb in Long-Term Care Facilities
59. Single- versus shared-occupancy bedrooms in long-term care homes during the COVID-19 pandemic: A regional cohort study of 355 facilities in British Columbia, Canada
60. Teaming up for long-term care: Recognizing all long-term care staff contribute to quality care
61. Ethical Issues in Long-term Care in Low-, Middle- and High-Income Countries During the COVID-19 Pandemic
62. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Health, Well-being, and Quality of Work-Life Outcomes Among Direct Care Nursing Staff Working in Nursing Home Settings: Protocol for a Systematic Review
63. Web-Based Presence for Social Connectedness in Long-Term Care: Protocol for a Qualitative Multimethods Study
64. COVID-19 vaccination delivery in long-term-care using the CARD (Comfort Ask Relax Distract) system: Mixed methods study of implementation drivers
65. Combining adaptive expertise and (critically) reflective practice to support the development of knowledge, skill, and society
66. This Was My Crimean War: COVID-19 Experiences of Nursing Home Leaders
67. #Morethanavisitor: Experiences of
COVID
‐19 visitor restrictions in Canadian long‐term care facilities
68. Algorithmic harms and digital ageism in the use of surveillance technologies in nursing homes
69. Bioethics and Gerontology: The Value of Thinking Together
70. Slam Bam, Thank you, Ma’am
: The Challenges of Advance Care Planning Engagement in Long-Term Care
71. Developing an evidence-informed model of long-term life care at home for older adults with medical, functional and/or social care needs in Ontario, Canada: a mixed methods study protocol
72. Changing Care: Applying the Transtheoretical Model of Change to Embed Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Long-Term Care Research in Canada
73. Integrating Nurse Practitioners Into Long-term Care: A Call for Action
74. Disaster Response in Italian Nursing Homes: A Qualitative Study during the COVID-19 Pandemic
75. The Impact of Pandemic Management Strategies on Staff Mental Health, Work Behaviours, and Resident Care in One Long-Term Care Facility in British Columbia: A Mixed Method Study
76. Reimagining Nutrition Care and Mealtimes in Long-Term Care
77. What factors influence nursing home use of hospital avoidance programs? An interview study
78. What factors have influenced quality of life in people with dementia and their family carers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study
79. Individual and contextual predictors of emergency department visits among community-living older adults: a register-based prospective cohort study
80. Place-Making through Media: How Media Environments Make a Difference for Long-Term Care Residents’ Agency
81. Black-abundance, Fat-revolt, and Crip-desire: Intersectionality as Interference in the Life and Death of Rohan Garfield Salmon
82. Nursing Home Managers’ High Risk of Burnout
83. Barriers and Benefits of Information Communication Technologies Used by Health Care Aides
84. Stakeholder Perspectives on In-home Passive Remote Monitoring to Support Aging in Place in the Province of New Brunswick, Canada: Rapid Qualitative Investigation
85. The Influence of Context on Implementation and Improvement: Protocol for a Mixed Methods, Secondary Analyses Study
86. Impact of COVID-19 on Relationship-Centred Residential Dining Practices
87. Multi-disciplinary supportive end of life care in long-term care: an integrative approach to improving end of life
88. Neglected Needs of Family Caregivers during the COVID-19 Pandemic and What They Need Now: A Qualitative Study
89. Predictors of Acute Encephalopathy in Patients with COVID-19
90. The Impact of COVID-19 on Social Isolation in Long-term Care Homes: Perspectives of Policies and Strategies from Six Countries
91. Non-pharmacological measures implemented in the setting of long-term care facilities to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infections and their consequences: a rapid review
92. Developmental Evaluation of the CHOICE+ Champion Training Program
93. How Can Health Systems Better Prepare for the Next Pandemic? Lessons Learned From the Management of COVID-19 in Quebec (Canada)
94. Global health and innovation: A panoramic view on health human resources in the COVID‐19 pandemic context
95. Social Connection in Long-Term Care Homes: A Scoping Review of Published Research on the Mental Health Impacts and Potential Strategies During COVID-19
96. When apathy is deadlier than COVID-19
97. The first five years of FACETS: Canada’s multidisciplinary open access academy journal
98. Recommendations from long-term care reports, commissions, and inquiries in Canada
99. Covid-19 and Priorities for Research in Aging
100. Easing the disruption of COVID-19: supporting the mental health of the people of Canada—October 2020—an RSC Policy Briefing
101. Les préposés aux bénéficiaires en CHSLD face aux prescriptions organisationnelles
relatives à la qualité