Please refer to the instructions to authors before submitting your manuscript. The manuscript submission checklist is also available as a PDF download.
L’aide-mémoire pour la soumission du manuscrit est également disponible en français.
FACETS is a multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary science journal that focuses on seven research areas: Biological and Life Sciences; Biomedical and Health Sciences; Data Science; Earth and Environmental Sciences; Engineering, Technology, and Mathematics; Integrative Sciences (including topics such as science and policy, and science communication); and Physical Sciences. Although not officially covering Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) topics, the Integrative Sciences section will include intersections of science and the social sciences. Additional subject categories will be added as the journal evolves in conjunction with emerging scientific advances.
FACETS will appeal to researchers studying in a variety of fields looking to publish and read multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary research.
FACETS is an open access peer-reviewed journal with a continuous publication schedule wherein articles are published as soon as they are ready. Articles requiring publication at a specific time (e.g., press released content) may be an exception. The journal publishes in electronic format only.
FACETS is a peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary open access science journal that publishes the following article types:
FACETS will accept replication studies and studies with negative results, providing that the authors clearly demonstrate the value of their findings and how the contribution advances knowledge.
Although FACETS does not impose a strict restriction on word count, authors are strongly encouraged to be as concise as possible. FACETS does not accept monographs. Submissions for most paper types are generally expected to be between 5000 and 10 000 words. Editorials and comments should usually not exceed 1400 words. Retrospectives should usually not exceed 2500 words.
Note: When assessing word counts, figures and tables of average length/size (around ¼ of a page) should be estimated as 250 words each, on average, excluding captions. Larger figures and tables should be estimated as 600 words each, on average, excluding captions.
Authors publishing in FACETS do not transfer copyright to Canadian Science Publishing and are free to reuse their material without seeking permission.
Material published in FACETS is governed by the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0) (this conforms with the licensing requirements of all major funding agencies).
Under the CC BY license, users are permitted to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) or adapt (remix, transform, and build upon) the material for commercial or non-commercial purposes, so long as appropriate credit is given to the authors and the source of the work. The license also ensures that the published material can be included in any scientific archive or repository.
To learn more about these licenses, visit the Creative Commons website. To learn more about the common funding agencies and their open access requirements, visit the NRC Research Press website.
In case of any enquiries, please contact the Editorial Office by email.
An article processing charge is due upon acceptance of a manuscript and must be paid before production will begin. Payment must be made in full by one author (or their sponsor). Multiple sources of payment will not be accepted.
Authors may be charged additional fees if they request excessive changes at the proof stage (for text or artwork).
For manuscripts originally submitted prior to 2022, the article processing charge for all paper types except Comments, invited Replies, Editorials, and Retrospectives is $1,350 CAD plus applicable taxes for researchers in Canada and $1,350 USD for researchers outside of Canada (no taxes apply). For manuscripts originally submitted Jan. 1 2022 or later, the APC for all paper types except Comments, invited Replies, Editorials and Retrospectives is $1,750 CAD plus applicable taxes for researchers in Canada and $1,750 USD for researchers outside of Canada (no taxes apply). The APC for Comments, Editorials, and Retrospectives is $500 CAD plus applicable taxes for researchers in Canada and $500 USD for researchers outside of Canada (no taxes apply). There is no charge for invited Replies
The contact information for the journal is as follows:
Editorial Office
FACETS
Canadian Science Publishing
1840 Woodward Drive, Suite 1
Ottawa, ON K2C 0P7 Canada
Fax: 613-656-9838
Email: [email protected]
During submission, authors will be asked to identify a primary manuscript subject, as well as a secondary manuscript subject for multidisciplinary papers.
Below are the broad subject areas currently covered by FACETS. “Sections” are indicated in bold. “Subjects” are listed below each section.
Please note that FACETS sections and subjects are broad categories that encompass a variety of specialties. Your specific field may not be included in the subject list but your manuscript likely fits within the coverage of one or more subjects. This broad approach helps to facilitate multi- and interdisciplinary submissions, and allows for maximum flexibility and inclusiveness.
Metadata is information that makes your article discoverable. It tells search engines what your article is about and helps determine what is displayed in response to a search query. You want to make sure that your metadata is rich and descriptive so that your article is at the top of the list in a search result.
Titles should be descriptive and unambiguously tell the reader what the article is about. Key words, terms, and phrases should be used to maximize the possibility of an internet crawler identifying the topic. Using plain, clear language is important, as figures of speech, humour, and jargon are not easily recognizable to electronic systems. If you want to incorporate humour, be sure that it is complemented with something descriptive.
Abstracts are more important than most people realize, and care should be taken when writing them. Because search engines look for duplication of terms, repeating keyword phrases in the title and abstract increases the chance that a paper will be found during an online search. Care should be taken, however, because excessive repetition of a term can cause a search engine to reject a web page. Abstracts should be detailed and descriptive, and should tell the reader exactly what the article is about, the context and methodology of the study, the results, conclusions, and why the study is important. Jargon should be minimized, and acronyms should be avoided when possible or defined when their use is necessary. Key words, terms, and phrases should again be used. No information that is not contained in the article should be included in the abstract. Remember that your abstract should entice the reader to want to read your full article!
Key words should be strong indicators of the content of your article at a glance. Wherever possible use multi-word phrases rather than single-word key words. The key words you choose should be descriptive, informative, and be repeated in the title and abstract. Use words and phrases that you would use yourself to search for an article.
We encourage you to submit a plain language summary of your article in addition to your regular abstract. This summary should
You can browse our plain language summaries on Medium.
Please refer to the “How to organize your manuscript” section for details on how to submit your plain language summary. Authors can also submit a high-resolution image to accompany the summary.
Upon publication, a plain language summary may be shared with our readers, journalists, and the general public via social media, news feeds, newsletters, and other means. With plain language summaries, we hope to reach a broader audience and encourage general interest in science as part of a greater science outreach strategy.
All submitted manuscripts must represent work that has not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere, and must meet all discipline-specific ethical requirements and standards.
Submissions must be clearly and concisely written in good English or French. Authors whose native language is not English or French should consult someone fluent in English or French prior to submission of the manuscript. Alternatively, a professional language-editing service can be used.
To facilitate publication, authors must check symbols, abbreviations, and technical terms for accuracy, consistency, and readability. Canadian Science Publishing maintains the right to preserve the technical quality of the Journal.
Authors are encouraged to follow the style and formatting requirements outlined in the Instructions to Authors in full prior to submission. Authors may choose to follow only minimum style and formatting instructions at submission (i.e., language quality, manuscript organization, manuscript length, page numbering, double-spacing, continuous line numbering, and general reference format). This will not affect the editorial decision. However, authors who follow the style and formatting instructions in full at submission will find the revision process easier.
Canadian Science Publishing (CSP) has partnered with Editage to offer pre-submission editing services to authors. The services offered by Editage will help authors, particularly those for whom English is not their first language, craft well-written manuscripts for submission to Canadian Science Publishing journals, making it easier for peer reviewers to assess the science of a manuscript and reducing the risk that a paper with good scientific content will be rejected because of a lack of clarity.
Please note that language editing does not guarantee that your manuscript will be sent out for peer review or be accepted for publication. Articles accepted for publication in a Canadian Science Publishing journal will still undergo a copy-editing process as part of the production process.
Editage is a leader in English-language editing, translation, and author education services and works closely with journal authors worldwide to improve their success in publication. Canadian Science Publishing authors get a special 15% discount on submissions made through this link.
If TeX or LaTeX files are submitted, please also upload a locally-generated PDF of your full manuscript. Please download the following instructions for details on how to submit TeX or LaTeX files: mchelp.manuscriptcentral.com/gethelpnow/tutorials/authorlatexfileupload.pdf
Authors must submit manuscripts via the ScholarOne Manuscripts online submission and peer review system.
Authors may register at any time on the site, but should register only once. During registration, authors choose a username and a password. The security of manuscripts is protected by the username/password system.
Authors will be asked to input information pertaining to the authors and the manuscript, answer some questions, and upload the submission files. Note: author order in the published manuscript will be as indicated on the title page of the supplied manuscript.
Authors will also be asked to select a primary subject (required) and a secondary subject for multidisciplinary papers, if applicable (otherwise select “none”). See our subjects section for details on the areas covered. When first submitting a manuscript for peer review, low-resolution versions of figures should be uploaded to limit file size. Note: Captions and links do not need to be entered separately when uploading figure files in ScholarOne, as they should be in the manuscript text; leave those fields blank and continue with the submission once all your files have been uploaded.
Submitted manuscripts are evaluated by the Editorial Office for suitability and general compliance with these Instructions to Authors. Manuscripts that do not meet the minimum guidelines are returned to authors for corrections as “Unsubmitted Draft”.
For assistance, please contact: [email protected]. A ScholarOne user manual with full instructions is available here.
Authors receive an automated acknowledgement from the online system when they make a successful submission. If an acknowledgement email has not been received, it could mean the submission was unsuccessful and authors should log into their Author Center to re-open their submission process, or that the email address was entered incorrectly when the author set up his or her profile, or that the email was captured by the institution’s SPAM filter. If the latter is the case, please contact your IT administrator to allow these emails to proceed to your inbox.
The corresponding author will be contacted by email and asked to submit a revision; the process is very similar to the initial submission.
For revisions use the ”View and Respond to Decision Letter” section in ScholarOne to include comments to the previous reviewers (pasted or attached as a separate file) rather than the “Cover Letter” section. A highlighted or “track changes” copy of the resubmitted manuscript showing changes made should be included as a file upload, in addition to a clean copy of the revised manuscript. Please include “show changes” or “clean copy” in the file name, as appropriate.
Submitting Production Files is the final step of the peer-review process. In ScholarOne, check that all author names appear as desired online and match what is on the title page of the manuscript. Check that the contact author in ScholarOne matches the corresponding (contact) author on the title page of the manuscript.
For accepted manuscripts, the corresponding author will be contacted to advise him or her of acceptance and to ask him or her to provide the final accepted manuscript file and all associated files for tables, figures, and files or repository links for supplementary material.
Text (including tables) should be provided in a word-processing format (any form of WordPerfect, Microsoft Word, TeX, or LaTeX).
All tables and equations are required to be in a workable format that can be physically manipulated (see How to organize your manuscript and Manuscript style guidelines).
For figures, see Preparation of graphic files.
Note that the “Cover Letter” section of ScholarOne should not repeat any information that is collected in the author questions in the “Details & Comments” section of ScholarOne.
Instead, use the “Cover Letter” to provide the following, as well as any additional information desired:
For resubmissions use the “Cover letter” section in ScholarOne to include comments to the previous reviewers (pasted or attached as a separate file). A copy of the resubmitted manuscript showing changes (with highlighting and track changes) must be included as a file upload, in addition to a clean copy of the revised manuscript. Please include “show changes” or “clean copy” in the file names.
For all published articles reporting original research in FACETS it is encouraged to have the data used in the article available in a publicly accessible database at the time of publication. Authors must ensure that all reasonable steps necessary to protect the privacy of human research subjects have been taken, in accordance with appropriate legal guidelines.
Authors must indicate in the manuscript text where the data are deposited and provide DOIs and/or links to the data sets online prior to submitting the production files of the accepted paper to the online submission system, so that they can be included in the published manuscript.
*To further our commitment to Open Science and to enhance transparency and reproducibility in the research we publish, FACETS has partnered with Dryad (http://www.datadryad.org), a nonprofit data repository. Through the end of 2025, authors publishing with FACETS can deposit their data and code in Dryad’s data repository for free using a provisional URL provided in the email notification confirming submission of their manuscript.
Please also refer to the Supplementary material section.
Manuscripts must be submitted via ScholarOne Manuscripts, the journal online submission and peer review system. Technical support for peer reviewers can be found online or by contacting the journal’s editorial office.
All original manuscript submissions are evaluated by one of the FACETS editors-in-chief. At this initial screening, editors-in-chief focus on appraising suitability for the journal. Manuscripts that are within journal scope and meet its basic scientific standards are, in most cases, assigned to a Senior Editor (regular submissions) or Guest Editor (submissions to a Collection). The Senior or Guest Editor will assess the manuscript for the quality of the science. Manuscripts of interest that are methodologically sound will then be assigned to a Subject Editor for peer review.
Subject Editors (also called handling editors) are responsible for seeking advice from a minimum of two (2) reviewers before making a recommendation to the Senior or Guest Editor. FACETS uses single-anonymous peer review: reviewers (called referees herein) remain anonymous to the authors unless they voluntarily self-identify.
Referees may be drawn from the journal’s user database in ScholarOne, the journals’ editorial board, the wider research community, or author recommendations. During submission, authors are asked to list suggested (required) and non-preferred (optional) referees, though editors are not obliged to use, or avoid, those referees. Referees are selected for their knowledge of, and their experience in, the subject treated in the manuscript.
Referees are asked to complete their reports in a timely manner. Referee reports should help authors improve their work (regardless of the editorial decision), and help editors decide whether to publish an article.
A note about author-suggested referees: At original submission, the submitting author must list two (2) potential referees for their manuscripts: referee first and last names, and their current email addresses, will be required. Qualified and eligible reviewers include other researchers in the field who are not in direct or indirect conflict of interest with the submitted manuscript. Please also consider naming international experts in the list. Recall that editors are under no obligation to use author-suggested referees.
The Senior Editor or Guest Editor, under the supervision of the Editors-in-Chief, retains full responsibility for all decisions regarding the manuscript. Referee and editor comments are included in decision letters, which are sent to all authors. Referees are informed of the decision and provided with the comments from their co-referees. Anonymity is preserved unless a referee has elected to sign their comments to the authors, in which case both authors and co-referees will see their name.
At revision, we ask that authors respond to all referee and editor comments and format their revised article according to journal style (see Instructions to Authors). Authors are given a specific timeframe for revisions. Requests for extensions should be made by email to the journal editorial office, and should include reasons for the extension. Unless there is a risk of data becoming outdated, extension requests are usually granted. Manuscripts that go over their revision deadline, and whose authors do not respond to journal editorial office queries, are withdrawn.
Accepted articles are published with their peer review history dates: date of submission date, date of acceptance, date of online publication, and the date of any corrections, if applicable. The names of editors who accepted the article (Senior or Guest Editor) and handled peer review (Subject Editor) are also published with the article.
After acceptance, the journal editorial office asks authors to supply material needed to publish articles to the highest standard. This includes:
There are several instances when authors must seek permission from a third party before the publication of their article can proceed:
After acceptance, the corresponding author will be asked to upload production-ready files to ScholarOne. For specifications, see the Instructions to Authors.
Commonly, at this stage, the journal editorial office will request:
After logging in to ScholarOne to upload production files and permissions, the corresponding author must provide information regarding:
Accepted manuscripts are edited for clarity, brevity, style, and consistency. At this point, metadata tags are applied, and the article is put in rough layout (also called page composition).
Galley proofs (the copyedited manuscript in layout, including tables/figures) are sent to the corresponding author, who must:
The galley proof stage is not the time to make extensive corrections, additions, or deletions.
After author alternations are incorporated, article layout is fine-tuned, and the article version of record is published on the journal website.
Once the paper has been published, all future correspondence should be with Canadian Science Publishing (fax: 613-656-9838; email: [email protected]). Canadian Science Publishing may make editorial changes as required, but will not make substantive changes to the content of a paper after publication without consultation with the author and the Editors.
The ethical standards expected of authors, reviewers, and editors are described in the Publishing Policy for FACETS (available here or upon request). Manuscripts must include descriptions of methods and specimens in sufficient detail to allow the work to be assessed or reproduced.
The Editorial Board considers a paper not eligible for publication if most of the content of the paper (i) is under consideration for publication or is published in a journal, or book chapter; (ii) is under consideration for publication or is published in a conference proceeding or a government publication with a substantial circulation (distributed to 100 or more individuals over a wide area). Authors may post a copy of their submitted or accepted manuscript on their website, an institutional repository, a preprint server, or their funding body’s designated archive, provided that the draft is not amended once accepted for publication. We strongly encourage authors to link preprints etc. to the final published version on the FACETS website, whenever possible, by adding a header to the preprint that includes hyperlinks and states “Submitted to FACETS (www.facetsjournal.com) on Month DD, Year. Final publication DOI: 10.1139/facets-XXXX-XXXX” or “Accepted for publication in FACETS (www.facetsjournal.com) on Month DD, Year. Final publication DOI: 10.1139/facets-XXXX-XXXX”, as applicable. Abstracts or extended abstracts related to conferences do not constitute prior publication. Extended abstracts are usually under 2000 words and do not include presentation of detailed tables and graphics of the results of the study.
Plagiarism (publishing a substantial portion of one’s own previously published research results without acknowledgement of such republication or using work published by another author without attribution) is a serious offence. Because Canadian Science Publishing is committed to combating plagiarism, it participates in CrossCheck. CrossCheck is a multi-publisher initiative to screen content for originality using the software iThenticate, which compares submitted manuscripts against the CrossCheck database of scholarly literature and detects instances of overlapping and similar text. You can find out more about CrossCheck here.
The corresponding author will be asked to affirm that all of the authors have read and approved the manuscript. In addition, the corresponding author should ensure that all individuals listed as authors have made a substantive creative contribution to the work. Clerical or mechanical contributions or provision of financial support are not grounds for ascribing authorship but may instead be acknowledged in the “Acknowledgements” section of the manuscript. Conversely, all those, regardless of status, who have made a creative contribution to the generation or analysis of the data are entitled to authorship.
The Editorial Board recognizes that authors and peer reviewers may have real or perceived conflicts of interest arising from intellectual, personal, or financial circumstances of their research. Submitted manuscripts should include full disclosure of funding sources for the research and an explanation of any real or perceived conflicts of interest that may arise during the peer-review process should be included in the appropriate area in ScholarOne during submission. Failure to disclose such conflicts may lead to refusal of a submitted manuscript.
All authors, regardless of their country of origin, who describe experiments on vertebrate animals are required to give assurance in the Materials and Methods section of the manuscript that the animals were cared for in accordance with the Guide to the Care and Use of Experimental Animals (Vol. 1, 2nd ed., 1993, and Vol. 2, 1984, available from the Canadian Council on Animal Care, 190 O’Connor St., Suite 800, Ottawa, ON K2P 2R3, Canada, or on their website) or the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (1996, published by National Academy Press, 2101 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20055, USA), and that their use of animals was reviewed and approved by the appropriate animal care review committee at the institution(s) where the experiments were carried out.
Authors who describe experiments on humans are required to provide assurance in the manuscript that appropriate standards for human experimentation have been followed, that the experiment has been reviewed and approved by their institution’s ethics review committee, and that the subjects have given informed consent prior to participating in the study.
Authors must certify that research involving endangered species was conducted in conformance with all applicable laws.
Authors must include the research permit or licence number from the appropriate agency if it was required to access field areas (e.g., Scientific Research Licences or Wildlife Research Permits in Canadian Territories).
Artifacts or specimens described or figured must be deposited in an accessible, permanent repository (i.e., a public museum or similar institution). Manuscripts involving artifacts or specimens that do not meet this criterion are not eligible for publication in FACETS. FACETS will also not publish research on artifacts or specimens that were exported or obtained illegally or without the necessary permission.
There are several instances when an author must seek permission from a third party before the publication of his or her paper can proceed:
Permission forms are available from the Editorial Office, if needed.
Authors should be aware that the journal considers digital images to be data. Hence, digital images submitted should contain the same data as the original image captured. Any manipulation using graphical software should be identified in the “Materials and methods” section of the manuscript, including both the name of the software and the techniques used to enhance or change the graphic in any way. Such a disclaimer ensures that the methods are repeatable and ensures the scientific integrity of the work. The removal of artefacts or any (nonintegral) data held in the image is discouraged.
Number all pages in the manuscript file, starting with the title page (including tables and figures, if uploaded as part of the main manuscript document).
All text should be double-spaced, including references, and have continuous line numbers in the left margin.
Submitted manuscripts should be organized as follows: title page, abstract (if applicable), key words, plain language summary (optional), text, acknowledgements, references, table captions, figure captions, labeled tables in numerical order, labeled figures in numerical order, and supplementary material. Limit manuscript heading sections and subsections to five levels. Heading and subheading levels should not be numbered, but must be distinct and clearly indicated in the manuscript text.
Retrospective submissions should include the name(s) and affiliation(s) of the author(s) of the Retrospective, the name of the person being recognized, as well as their date of birth and date of death (if applicable). At least one photo of the person being recognized should be included (permissions required). It should focus on their scientific work and career accomplishments. Consider including the position they last held, place and year of qualifications, postgraduate qualifications, key scientific achievements, etc. Please make judicious use of figures, tables, and references. Before submitting a Retrospective to FACETS, please e-mail the EiCs to ensure there is no duplication in submissions.
Titles should be informative but brief. Titles should contain important descriptive phrases that relate to the topic and key result. See also our Tips for maximizing discoverability section.
Authors’ full names, affiliations, and full addresses including email addresses should be included on the title page. Each author on the list must have an affiliation. The affiliation includes department, university, or organizational affiliation and its location, including city, state/province (if applicable), and country. If an author has multiple affiliations, enter all affiliations on the title page only. In the submission system, enter only the preferred or primary affiliation. This list of authors on the title page should match that provided in the submission system.
The corresponding author(s) should be indicated on the title page of the manuscript text. The corresponding author listed in the manuscript text should be the same as the corresponding (contact) author designated in the online submission system. Note: author order in the published manuscript will be as indicated on the title page of the supplied manuscript.
An abstract is required for every contribution except Comments/Replies and Editorials, and should consist of one paragraph that contains accurate descriptive words of the content. It should be no more than 200 words and should appear on a separate page of the submitted manuscript. References should not be cited in the abstract. See also our Tips for maximizing discoverability section.
Authors are encouraged to submit a graphical abstract with their manuscript. The purpose of a graphical abstract is to visually describe a concept or finding from the paper to entice readers and encourage understanding of the main message of the paper. The graphical abstract may consist of an illustration, diagram, equation, or other informative visual that serves to explain the subject of the article.
Authors should note that the maximum allowable width of the final reproduction is 135 mm (510 pixels). The graphical abstract should be uploaded as a separate file, using the “Graphical Abstract” file upload type in ScholarOne.
A maximum of six key words or phrases should be placed directly below the abstract. See also our Tips for maximizing discoverability section.
Authors are encouraged to submit a plain language summary of their article in addition to the regular abstract. This summary should be concise, clear, and free of jargon. The plain language summary should be uploaded as a separate file, using the “Plain Language Summary” file upload type in ScholarOne. It can be uploaded during initial submission, when a revision is submitted, or after acceptance when production files are submitted. See also the Tips for maximizing discoverability section.
The introduction should be limited to the scope, purpose, and rationale of the study. An introduction generally need not exceed 500 words.
Experimental and computational methods must be sufficiently detailed to permit reproduction of the work, but must be concise and avoid lengthy descriptions of known procedures; the latter should be specified by appropriate references. Experimental protocols should include appropriate controls, and control data should be provided to allow comparison with the experimental results.
Sources of biological materials, experimental methods, geographical locations, and statistical methods should be described. Sources of commercially available laboratory or field equipment and fine chemicals should be indicated in parentheses; list the company name, city, and country.
The results should be as comprehensive as possible but limited to answers to the questions posed in the purpose of the work. Material supplementary to the text can be associated with the published manuscript on the journal website or in a recognized repository and referenced in the text (see our Supplementary material section).
The discussion should be limited to presenting the main contributions of the study and interpreting particular findings, comparing them with those of other workers. The Discussion can be combined with the Results section (as Results and Discussion). The inclusion of a separate Conclusions section is at the discretion of the author(s).
The journal uses The Harvard citation style (Author and Date system) for references.
Each reference must be cited in the text using the surnames of the authors and the year, for example, “(Walpole 1985)” or “Green and Brown (1990)”. If there are three or more authors, the citation should give the name of the first author followed by et al. (e.g., “Green et al. 1991”). If references occur that are not uniquely identified by the authors’ names and year, use “a”, “b”, “c”, etc., after the year (e.g., “Green 1983a, 1983b” or “Green and Brown 1988a, 1988b”) for the text citation and in the reference list.
The reference list must be double-spaced and placed at the end of the text. References must be listed in alphabetical order according to the name of the first author and not numbered. References with the same first author are listed in the following order: (i) papers with one author only in chronological order; (ii) papers with dual authorship follow, listed in alphabetical order; (iii) papers with three or more authors are arranged chronologically. Use “et al.” after six authors within a reference citation in the reference list.
The Harvard style can vary in minor features such as punctuation, capitalisation, abbreviations, and the use of italics. References should follow the form outlined below and used in current issues of the journal. Note that the names of serials are not abbreviated in the reference list for FACETS.
Examples of bibliographic citations (authors are encouraged to search their library style guide for further examples of the Harvard style) |
|
Journal |
Heaman LM, Erdmer P, and Owen JV. 2002. U–Pb geochronologic constraints on the crustal evolution of the Long Range Inlier, Newfoundland. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 39(5): 845–865. https://doi.org/10.1139/e02-015. |
Book |
Neuendorf KKE, Mehl JP Jr, and Jackson JA. 2011. Glossary of Geology. 5th edition. American Geological Institute, Alexandria, Virginia. 800 p. |
Conference Proceedings |
Jagoutz E, Palme H, Baddenhausen H, Blum K, Cendales M, Dreibus G, Spettel B, Lorenz V, and Wänke H. 1979. The abundances of major, minor and trace elements in the earth’s mantle as derived from primitive ultramafic nodules. In Proceedings of the 10th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, Houston, Texas, 19–23 March 1979. Vol. 2. pp. 2031–2050. |
Chapter / Edited Volume Contribution |
Colpron M, Nelson JL, and Murphy DC. 2006. A tectonostratigraphic framework for the pericratonic terranes of the northern Canadian Cordillera. In Paleozoic evolution and metallogeny of pericratonic terranes at the Ancient Pacific Margin of North America, Canadian and Alaskan Cordillera. Edited by M Colpron and JL Nelson. Geological Association of Canada Special Paper 45. pp. 1–23. |
Report / Grey Literature |
Escayola M, Murphy DC, Garuti G, Zaccarini F, Proenza JA, Aiglsperger T, and van Staal C. 2012. First finding of Pt–Pd-rich chromitite and platinum group element mineralization in southwest Yukon mantle peridotite complexes. Yukon Geological Survey, Open File 2012-12. 18 p. |
Thesis / Dissertation |
Fecova K. 2009. Conuma River and Leagh Creek intrusive complexes: windows into mid-crustal levels of the Jurassic Bonanza Arc, Vancouver Island, British Columbia. M.Sc. thesis, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia. 221 p. |
Electronic Citation |
Quinion MB. 1998. Citing online sources: advice on online citation formats [online]: Available from http://www.worldwidewords.org/articles/citation.htm. |
Organize tables and figures to facilitate comparisons, grouping related data in as few tables and figures as feasible. As far as possible, make the tables and figures clear without reference to the text.
Table and figure captions should be listed before the tables and figures in the submitted manuscript. Component figures must be combined into one figure, and parts of figures should be indicated with lowercase roman letters (e.g., “Fig. 1a”). In the caption, figure parts are referred to using lowercase roman letters in parentheses, e.g., “(a)”.
Tables and figures should be numbered in Arabic numerals in the order cited in the text and each should have a brief title. Type each table on a separate sheet. Table footnotes should be indicated by lowercase italic superscript letters.
Tables must be in an editable table format (preferred), an Excel spreadsheet format, or typed into the text. Tables (and equations) must not be submitted in *.gif, *.jpg, or other picture formats (neither within the manuscript nor as separate files).
For figure formatting requirements, refer to the Preparation of graphic files and Preparation of multimedia files sections that follow.
FACETS does not publish appendices; instead, material that is not part of the article itself can be submitted as Supplementary Material (refer to the Supplementary material section that follows).
Supplementary material consists of additional tables and figures (including maps), detailed calculations, and data sets that are relevant to but not essential for understanding or evaluating the paper, and are not published as part of the article itself.
This material is not edited, converted, or scanned, and will appear exactly as submitted. This prevents any errors from being inadvertently introduced during file manipulation. Thus, supplementary material will be made available in its native file format when the article is published. Supplementary tables and figures should be numbered consecutively, but separately from those published in the paper (e.g., Fig. S1, Table S1, etc.). All supplementary material should be mentioned or referred to within the main manuscript text.
Authors can submit supplementary material files through ScholarOne along with their manuscript files, but are strongly encouraged to deposit them in a suitable repository instead to ensure long-term preservation and retrievability. DataCite provides a tool for finding suitable repositories.
If authors deposit their supplementary materials in an online repository, they must indicate where, and provide DOIs and/or links to the material prior to submitting their final production files so that this information can be included in the final published manuscript.
When submitting supplementary material via ScholarOne, use the “Supplementary material” file upload type and name the files “Supplementary Material 1”, “Supplementary Material 2”, “Supplementary Material 3”, etc.
When first submitting a manuscript for peer review, low-resolution versions of figures should be uploaded to limit file size. High-resolution files will be requested for the production files. Note: Captions and links do not need to be entered separately when uploading figure files in ScholarOne, as they should be in the manuscript text; leave those fields blank and continue with the submission once all your files have been uploaded.
Illustrations, figures, and other artwork (such as multimedia) must be supplied in an electronic format.
If electronic files are not available or if those supplied are inadequate for reproduction, hard-copy originals of adequate quality, either previously supplied or requested from the author, will be scanned. Note that the scanner will easily reproduce flaws (e.g., correction fluid, smudges).
Remember that the more complex your artwork becomes, the greater the possibility for problems at output time. Avoid complicated textures and shadings, especially in vector illustration programs; this increases the chance for a poor-quality final product.
All figures should be submitted at the desired published size. For figures with several parts (a, b, c, d, etc.) created using the same software application, assemble them into one file rather than sending several files. Name all figure files using the following format. Figure1.xxx, Figure2.xxx (where “xxx” is the file extension, e.g., “ai”, “eps”).
Only Windows or Macintosh versions of True Type or Type 1 fonts should be used (e.g., Times New Roman, Arial, Tahoma). Do not use bitmap or nonstandard fonts.
Fills and outlines should be greater than 10% black.
Canadian Science Publishing strongly urges authors to send their figure files for journal production as one of the following file types: *.eps, *ai, *.tif, *.pdf, *.jpg, *.doc, or *.xls. These file types can be created by exporting or saving within most common software programs to create the figure file.
For Bitmap (raster) files the proper resolution should be used when submitting bitmap artwork. The minimum requirements for resolution are 600 dpi for line art, 1200 dpi for fine lines (line art with fine lines or shading), 300 dpi for halftones and colour, and 600 dpi for combinations (halftones with lettering outside the photo area).
All colour files submitted must be as CMYK (cyan, magenta, yellow, and black). These colours are used in full-colour printing. RGB graphics (red, green, and blue; colours specifically used to produce an image on a monitor) will not print correctly.
Vector files are image files produced using elements such as lines and shapes. Typically these files are used for line drawings.
Bitmaps inside vector files: Bitmaps can be imported into vector/draw applications only for the purpose of adding and overlaying information, lines, text, etc. Bitmaps should not be resized, cropped, rotated, or otherwise manipulated after importing.
List of accepted formats for journal production |
|
PC Software (current and legacy versions) |
File Extensions (Save As or Export) |
Adobe Acrobat |
|
Adobe Illustrator |
*.ai, *.eps |
Adobe Photoshop |
*.tif, *.jpg |
MS Excel |
*.xls, *.xlsx |
MS Word |
*.doc, *.docx |
The journal allows authors to incorporate audio clips, video clips, animated *.gif files, *.ppt presentations etc. into their paper; these are published in the online version of the journal, adding a dimension to the paper that cannot be achieved in the printed version. The journal can also link to associated YouTube videos, webinars etc., subject to approval.
At submission, please clearly indicate in your manuscript text where there is an associated media file. Provide the name of the corresponding media file.
List of accepted formats for journal production |
|
Video Software |
File Extensions (Save As or Export) |
MS Windows Media Player |
*.avi, *.wmv, *.mpeg, *.mpg |
Quicktime (PC or Mac) |
*.qt, *.avi, *.wmv, *.mpeg, *.mpg |
Spelling should follow that of Webster's Third New International Dictionary or the Oxford English Dictionary. Authors are responsible for consistency in spelling.
SI units (Système international d’unités) should be used or SI equivalents should be given. For practical reasons, some exceptions to SI units could be allowed.
If applicable, a list of symbols should be provided after the reference list.
Abbreviations and acronyms should be defined when they are first mentioned in the text. Alternatively, if used extensively in the manuscript a list of abbreviations and acronyms can be included after the references (following the list of symbols, if applicable). If an abbreviation is widely recognized in the field and has been used for some time, it may be used without definition (e.g., ANOVA, PCR, and EDTA). To minimize confusion, please avoid the creation of new abbreviations. Abbreviate terms denoting units of mass and measurement in the text only when they are preceded by numerals.
All displayed equations should be represented in true editable format, preferably using a math editor (MathType); however, authors should insert simple inline equations in text without using MathType. When inserting symbols from the “Symbol” palette in MS Word, authors should use the “normal text” or “Symbol” fonts. Symbols should be inserted using MathType ONLY if they cannot be found in the "Symbol" palette under one of those two fonts.
Authors submitting manuscripts of a survey or taxonomic nature are required to deposit representative specimens in a recognized depository. Prior to commencing a study, authors should make arrangements with a suitable recognized depository or a provincial museum. The catalogue or accession numbers should be included in the manuscript or, if necessary, added at the proof stage.
As of January 1, 2012 and in accordance with the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (ICN), Melbourne Code (2012), the publication date (date of record) is the date that the final paginated version of record is posted on the journal’s website. Authors are encouraged but not required to (i) place material in multiple trusted online digital repositories, (ii) publish in publications that are archived, (iii) deposit printed copies containing the journal’s ISSN (2371-1671) to libraries in more than one area of the world and preferably in different continents, and (iv) if the new taxon being described is a fungus, then a MycoBank number obtained from MycoBank must be cited within the text of the manuscript (e.g., Description section). The MycoBank number can be added at the proof stage.
As of January 1, 2012 and in accordance with the amendments to the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN), 4th ed., the publication date (date of record) is the date that the final paginated version of record is posted on the journal’s website. Authors must (i) register new taxonomic descriptions with ZooBank and obtain a ZooBank number, (ii) cite the ZooBank number within the text of the manuscript (e.g., Description section), and (iii) provide the journal’s ISSN (2371-1671), volume, issue, and page range of the published work to ZooBank. The ZooBank number can be added at the proof stage.
Nomenclature should follow the rules established by international authoritative bodies such as the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (IUBMB), the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (ICN), the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC), the Chemical Abstracts Services (CAS), the Committee on Nomenclature, Terminology, and Symbols of the American Chemical Society, and the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN).
As a general guide for biological terms, Scientific Style and Format: The CSE Manual for Authors, Editors, and Publishers (8th ed., 2014; http://www.scientificstyleandformat.org/Home.html), published by the Council of Science Editors, is recommended. Bacteria
The use of genotypic and phenotypic designations should follow the recommendations of Demerec et al. (Genetics, 54: 61–74, 1966). (i) Phenotypic designations must be used when mutant loci have not been identified or mapped. Phenotypic designations generally consist of three-letter symbols, not italicized, with the first letter capitalized. Superscript letters may be used (e.g., Strs for streptomycin sensitivity). (ii) Genotypic designations are composed of three-letter locus symbols written in lower case italics. Wild-type alleles are indicated by positive superscripts (e.g., his+). If several loci control related functions, they are distinguished by italicized capital letters following the gene symbols (e.g., hisA, hisB). Mutation sites are indicated by putting the serial isolation numbers (allele numbers) after the locus symbol. Deviations from normal use should be defined. For more detailed information about the symbols in current use, consult reviews by Bachmann (Microbiol. Rev. 47: 180–230, 1983) for Escherichia coli K-12; Sanderson and Roth (Microbiol. Rev. 52: 485–532, 1988) for Salmonella spp.; and Henner and Hoch (Microbiol. Rev. 44: 57–82, 1980) for Bacillus subtilis.
Nomenclature should follow the rules recommended by the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (IUBMB) Committee of Editors of Biochemical Journals, with support of the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC).
The International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (International Association for Plant Taxonomy) should be followed. Note that the first occurrence of a species name in a manuscript is presented with the genus written in full and the authority name(s) included (e.g., Populus angustifolia James). In subsequent mentions of the same species, the genus is abbreviated to the first letter and no authority name(s) is listed (e.g., P. angustifolia). To avoid confusion, when different genera share the same first letter, the genera are written in full throughout the manuscript. Genera are always written in full at the beginning of a sentence.
Nomenclature of Organic Chemistry, Sections A, B, C, D, E, F, and H, Pergamon Press, London, 1979; Nomenclature of Inorganic Chemistry, Butterworth, London, 1971; Quantities, Units and Symbols in Physical Chemistry, Blackwell, London, 1987. Tentative recommendations exist for organometallic nomenclature, IUPAC Information Bulletin No. 31, 1973; for stereochemical designations, J. Org. Chem. 35, 2849, 1970; and for steroids, J. Org. Chem. 34, 1517, 1969. Although tentative IUPAC rules have been published for carbohydrate nomenclature (Biochemistry, 10, 3983, 1971), the British–American nomenclature is recommended (J. Org. Chem. 28, 281, 1963), until the IUPAC rules become definitive. For nomenclature not covered by international convention, the usage of the American Chemical Society should be followed, for example, The Naming and Indexing of Chemical Compounds (Introduction to Chemical Abstracts Subject Index 56, IN, 1962). Rigid adherence to nomenclature rules is not expected each time a compound is mentioned in a manuscript, but the approved names should be given at least once, preferably in an early part of the manuscript.
Refer to Enzyme Nomenclature (1992): Recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (IUBMB) (Academic Press, San Diego, Calif.)
Should follow the American Geological Institute’s Glossary of Geology (1997) except where superceded by international recommendations, such as those of the International Union of Geological Sciences’ Subcommission on the Systematics of Igneous Rocks and of the International Mineralogical Association on the nomenclature of minerals. Abbreviations for mineral names should follow R. Kretz (American Mineralogist, 68: 277–279, 1983) and should be summarized in a footnote or figure caption. Stratigraphic nomenclature should follow the North American Stratigraphic Code (American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 67: 841–875, 1983). Canadian lithostratigraphic units are summarized in the regional Lexicons of Canadian Stratigraphy published by the Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists.
Only formal time-stratigraphic and geologic-time units should be capitalized, in accordance with the definitions established by the International Commission on Stratigraphy (ICS). New 14C dates reported in manuscripts must include the laboratory reference number.
Such symbols shall conform to those recommended by the Metric Subcommittee of the Canadian Geotechnical Society (Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 17: 89–96, 1980).
Authors are required to use currently accepted names for microorganisms as indicated in the International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria (1990 revision). A new name is not validly published until a note containing the name is also published in the International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. Microorganisms and viruses should be given strain designations consisting of letters (usually two) followed by serial numbers. It is generally advisable to use the worker’s initials or a descriptive symbol of locate or laboratory. Each new isolate will then be given a new (serial) designation (AB1, AB2, etc.). Genotypic and phenotypic symbols should not be included.
Nomenclature of transposable elements (transposons, Mu) should follow Campbell et al. (Gene, 5: 197–206, 1979), and for plasmids, should follow Novick et al. (Bacteriol. Rev. 40: 168–189, 1976).
In the genetic nomenclature of bacterial viruses (bacteriophages), no distinctions are made between genotype and phenotype. Genetic symbols may be one, two, or three letters.
Authors are required to follow the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (4th ed., 1999). Specifically, authors should provide the authority name(s) and date for all genus- and species-level taxa at the first mention within the Abstract and within the text (but not in the title). In subsequent mentions of the same species, the genus is abbreviated to the first letter and no author name(s) or date is listed (e.g., “S. plicata”). Genera are always written in full at the beginning of a sentence. In the case of changed combinations, the authorship and date should be set in parentheses. For example, “Ascidia plicata Lesueur, 1823” is cited as “Styela plicata (Lesueur, 1823)” when transferred to the genus Styela.