CLOSE
This journal
Advanced searchCitation search
Suggested Terms:
Skip main navigation

Search Result

Anywhere
1 - 5of5
per page:
Relevance
Filters

You do not have any saved searches

  • OPEN ACCESS
    Personality and perfectionism as predictors of life satisfaction: The unique contribution of having high standards for others
    FACETS • Vol. 3 • No. 1 • pp. 227 - 241
    Life satisfaction is directly related to positive mental and physical health outcomes. As such, the promotion of life satisfaction is desirable. To facilitate this process, it is beneficial to identify significant predictors of life satisfaction. Although previous research has established that personality is a reliable predictor of life satisfaction, personality is not easily modifiable. In contrast, perfectionism can be effectively adapted with appropriate therapy, leading to decreases in mental illness symptomology. The present study sought to determine if different aspects of perfectionism predicted life satisfaction beyond the influence of personality. A total of 448 online participants (75% female) completed questionnaires assessing life satisfaction, perfectionism, and personality. Results of a hierarchical multiple regression analysis revealed that lower scores on neuroticism (being emotionally stable; p < 0.001) and higher scores on extraversion (p < 0.001) and conscientiousness (p = 0.003) significantly predicted life satisfaction. In addition, one aspect of perfectionism, high standards for others (p = 0.001), positively predicted life satisfaction beyond the influence of personality. We suggest that encouraging individuals to hold others to high standards is an effective strategy that may foster shared goals and achievements, which in turn may improve overall life satisfaction.
  • OPEN ACCESS
    Non-HDL cholesterol level and depression among Canadian elderly—a cross-sectional analysis of the baseline data from the CLSA
    FACETS • Vol. 5 • No. 1 • pp. 1006 - 1018
    To explore whether non-high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-c) is associated with depression, a total of 26 819 Canadians aged 45–85 from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) were included in analysis. Non-HDL-c, the difference between total-c and HDL-c, was categorized into five levels, i.e., <2.6, 2.6 to <3.7, 3.7 to <4.8, 4.8 to 5.7, and ≥5.7 mmol/L. History of clinical depression was collected by questionnaire at an in-home interview, and current potential depression status was determined by CES-D10 (Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale 10 questions version) score, i.e., ≥10 vs. <10. Logistic continuation ratio model for ordinal data was used to estimate the odds of being at or above a higher non-HDL-c category for depression status. Compared with those without clinical depression history and currently undepressed, the adjusted odds ratios (95% CI) were 1.09 (1.02, 1.17) for those without clinical depression history but currently depressed, 1.05 (0.98, 1.12) for those had clinical depression history but currently undepressed, and 1.21 (1.10, 1.32) for those had clinical depression history and currently depressed. The average of non-HDL-c for four depression groups were 3.64, 3.71, 3.69, and 3.82 mmol/L, respectively, and group 4 was statistically higher than others (p < 0.001). In conclusion, people with both current depression and a history clinical depression are at an increased risk of having high level of non-HDL-c.
  • OPEN ACCESS
    Youth COVID-19 stressors and associations with self-perceived health, depression, anxiety, and at-risk alcohol and cannabis use
    FACETS • Vol. 9 • pp. 1 - 10
    Adolescents and young adults have been particularly vulnerable to disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The objectives were to identify youth's self-reported pandemic-related stressors and examine how these stressors were related to six negative health outcomes: self-perceived, fair-to-poor physical, and mental health, depression, anxiety, and at-risk alcohol and cannabis use. Data were from the Well-Being and Experiences Study (The WE Study) from Manitoba, Canada (17–22 years old; n = 587; collected from November 2021 to January 2022). The COVID-19 stressors reported most frequently since pandemic onset included: (1) not being able to spend time with friends (78.5%); (2) feeling lonely or isolated (69.9%); and (3) remote learning for school, college, or university (68.4%). In reference to the “past month”, frequently reported stressors were (1) remote learning (42.6%); (2) feeling lonely or isolated (41.2%); and (3) uncertainty about the future (41.1%). Overall, 26.1% of the sample perceived their physical health as fair-to-poor and 59.1% perceive their mental health as fair-to-poor. A number of stressors were related to fair-to-poor mental health, depression, and anxiety; fewer were related to fair-to-poor physical health and at-risk alcohol and cannabis use. These findings can inform future pandemics and recovery efforts to improve pandemic-related health risks among youth.
  • OPEN ACCESS
    Parents’ COVID-19 stressors and associations with self-rated health, symptoms of mental health problems, and substance use: a cross-sectional study
    FACETS • Vol. 10 • pp. 1 - 13
    The aim of this study was to understand associations between pandemic stressors and parents’ self-rated physical and mental health; symptoms of mental health problems, and at-risk substance use problems. Data were collected from February 2022 to March 2022 as part of Wave 2 of the Well-being and Experiences Study in Manitoba, Canada (n = 749). Stressors frequently identified since the onset of the pandemic included inability to spend time with family and friends, worry about getting coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), and travel restrictions. In the past month, the most frequently identified stressors were worry about getting COVID-19, travel restrictions, public health restrictions, and worry about the future. The stressors with the greatest number of associations with worse health outcomes included: job loss or financial burden; feeling lonely or isolated; disrupted or poor sleep; uncertainty about the future; accessing health care for any reason; increased conflict in relationships; cancellation of surgeries, caregiving for children; and inability to spend time with family. Understanding the COVID-19 stressors that were associated with health and substance problems can inform clinical approaches to respond to pandemic-related problems, as well as public health preparedness to mitigate declines in parents’ health and well-being in the context of future pandemics.
  • OPEN ACCESS
    Poor mental health negatively impacts farmers personally, interpersonally, cognitively, and professionally
    FACETS • Vol. 9 • pp. 1 - 16
    Farmers globally face significant occupational stressors and are reported to experience high levels of depression, anxiety, burnout, suicide ideation, and suicide. While the impacts of high stress and poor mental health have been well-studied in the general population, and to some extent, in specific occupations, the impacts on farmers are understudied. The objective here was to explore the lived experience of high stress and (or) poor mental health in Canadian farmers, including the perceived impacts. Using a phenomenological approach within a constructivist paradigm, we conducted 75 one-on-one research interviews with farmers and people who work closely with farmers, in Ontario, Canada, between July 2017 and May 2018. We analysed the data via thematic analyses and identified four major themes. Participants described myriad negative impacts of farmers’ high stress and (or) poor mental health: (1) personally, (2) interpersonally, and (3) cognitively, which ultimately negatively impacted them (4) professionally, including consequences for productivity, animals, and farm success. The data described far-reaching, interconnected impacts of high stress and poor mental health on participants, the people and animals in their lives, and most aspects of their farming operations, financial viability, and success. Farmer stress, mental health, and well-being are important considerations in promoting sustainable, successful agriculture.