Abstract

In many regions, a tradeoff exists between draining wetlands to support the expansion of agricultural land, and conserving wetlands to maintain their valuable ecosystem services. Decisions about wetland drainage are often made without identifying the impacts on the services these systems provide. We address this gap through a novel assessment of impacts on ecosystem services via wetland drainage in the Canadian prairie landscape. Draining pothole wetlands has large impacts, but sensitivity varies among the indicators considered. Loss of water storage increased the magnitude of median annual flows, but absolute increases with drainage were higher for larger, less frequent events. Total phosphorus exports increased in concert with streamflow. Our analysis suggested disproportionate riparian habitat losses with the first 30% of wetland area drained. Dabbling ducks and wetland-associated bird abundances respond strongly to the loss of small wetland ponds; abundances were predicted to decrease by half with the loss of only 20%–40% of wetland area. This approach to evaluating changes to key wetland ecosystem services in a large region where wetland drainage is ongoing can be used with an economic valuation of the drainage impacts, which should be weighed against the benefits associated with agricultural expansion.

Introduction

In the 21st century, with a growing global population, expectations of increased food production, and heightened stressors on the Earth's systems, well-reasoned land management decisions are increasingly important. Compelling evidence that multiple planetary boundaries are exceeded or at risk of being exceeded (Steffen et al. 2015) suggests that transformative management approaches are urgently needed. Agricultural land use has received much attention in this context (e.g., Foley et al. 2005), and it has been argued that food production must grow while concomitantly decreasing the industry's environmental footprint (Foley et al. 2011). The potential for tradeoffs between food production (e.g., food, forage) and underlying natural ecosystem services (e.g., pollination, carbon sequestration, hydrological services), as well as the risk of agricultural practices contributing to disservices (e.g., habitat loss, erosion) in agricultural ecosystems (Power 2010), are important considerations.
The Prairie region of Canada is part of one of the world's major food-producing regions, where more than 40 million ha are used as pasture or cropland, and agricultural practices continually evolve. Past practice changes include the adoption of no-till and reduced tillage to address issues of erosion and soil health (Awada et al. 2014), but the region is not immune to the challenges of balancing food production with other ecosystem services. Water security challenges in the region abound (Gober and Wheater 2014). There is a long history of increasing farm size, despite limited change in total farm area (Statistics Canada 2022), and farm equipment has also increased in size. Removing wetlands to increase arable land is a long-standing practice that was incentivized by early government programs (Stunden Bower 2011); declining wetland coverage has been documented many times since (Watmough and Schmoll 2007; Davidson 2014). Wetland drainage continues—annual loss rates in the region are on the order of 10 800 ha year−1 (Watmough et al. 2017)—in part because of the nuisance costs (De Laporte 2014) of navigating larger equipment around the once ubiquitous small pothole wetland ponds. Drainage impacts on surface hydrology and groundwater recharge, biogeochemical flows, and biodiversity in the region have been documented (Baulch et al. 2021), yet pragmatic, place-based approaches are needed to understand the magnitude of effects and inform decisions around wetland drainage in the region.
While drainage can allow producers to expand the area under cultivation, improve trafficability, or improve operational efficiency, wetland drainage can also contribute to conflicts (Minnes et al. 2020). This occurs in part because of financial losses to downstream landowners who can be flooded out as a result of removing wetlands from the landscape (Office of the Parliamentary Budget Officer 2016), but also because of the complex socio-ecological tradeoffs associated with wetland drainage, which can carry notable value divergence among stakeholders and rightsholders. Ecosystem services models have emerged as one tool for use in these contexts, including for water regulation ecosystem services (e.g., Nedkov et al. 2022), as they can simulate changes in multiple ecosystem services (Malinga et al. 2015), helping to provide broad assessment that goes beyond disciplinary-focused work on a single dimension. Where models can effectively represent the biophysical response to stressors at landscape scales, they can be used in scenario analysis to anticipate tradeoffs of management actions (e.g., Montoya et al. 2020) and to support decision-making through ecosystem accounting (e.g., Schröter et al. 2015).
The Canadian prairie is a unique landscape, owing to its climate, hydrological complexity, and the overall intensity of land management for agriculture. Together, these factors preclude robust quantification of wetland-associated ecosystem services for the region with existing models. Given frequent water scarcity and the importance of depressional wetlands as a feature of this ecosystem, any assessment of changes to ecosystem services for this region must be underpinned with strong hydrological representation. Our objective is to provide, for the first time, a more integrated approach for quantifying the potential for loss of ecosystem services associated with agricultural drainage of pothole wetlands across the region. We use a novel modelling framework incorporating several types of environmental models deployed at mesoscales (∼100 km2), as this is the smallest watershed (e.g., basin) size that has been delineated across the region and provides a reasonable proxy for the scales at which land management decisions are made. Specifically, we focus our analysis on one watershed class that spans the Canadian prairie and was identified as having the highest wetland density. Our analysis considers how depressional water storage, surface water runoff, nutrient export, and abundances of wetland-associated birds and ducks can change when wetland habitat is lost.

Methods

Study area

Our work focuses on the Prairies Ecozone of southwestern Canada, lying at the northern extent of the Great Plains of North America. The Prairies Ecozone spans southern portions of the provinces of Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba, and most of this area lies in the Prairie Pothole Region of North America, which is widely known for the myriad depressional wetlands left by recent (10 000 ybp) deglaciation. Topography across much of the region ranges from flat to hummocky, with the depressions playing an important hydrological and biogeochemical role; large areas of the region do not connect to higher order streams in most years (non-effective areas), and drainage networks are poorly established (Stichling and Blackwell 1957; Shook et al. 2015). This regular hydrological disconnection is important for trapping water to permit groundwater recharge, and solutes to limit nutrient loading to downstream water bodies. The regional climate is described as semi-arid to sub-humid, with conditions varying strongly by year as the region experiences dry and wet phases. Mean annual temperatures vary from 1 to 6 °C (Mekis and Vincent 2011) and annual precipitation ranges from 350–650 mm (Gray and Landine 1988), but is typically less than potential evapotranspiration (600–800 mm year–1; Morton 1983).
Under these regional climate conditions, frozen soils limit infiltration during snowmelt, which makes it the key hydrologic period for producing upland runoff. Snow is redistributed across the landscape during the winter, where it accumulates in depressions (Pomeroy et al. 2007). Because of the excess snow and runoff available during spring melt, depressional wetlands fill, and surface runoff networks can be activated when wetland ponds reach their spill point (Leibowitz and Vining 2003; Shaw et al. 2012). Under these conditions, pond volumes peak in the spring and decline over the course of the warm season. Many of these depressional wetlands have water ponded above the surface for periods ranging from weeks to years (Stewart and Kantrud 1971). These ponds provide critical habitat for a wide variety of biota. This includes many bird species (Mantyka‐Pringle et al. 2019; Elliott et al. 2020), and the Prairie Pothole Region attracts a disproportionate number of North America's breeding ducks, producing up to 50% from only 10% of the land mass (Greenwood et al. 1995; Doherty et al. 2018).
Delineation of small (∼100 km2) watersheds across the Prairie Ecozone with the HydroSHEDS global dataset has identified more than 4000 distinct watersheds (Lehner et al. 2008). These have been classified into seven different watershed types using a hierarchical clustering analysis according to their biophysical characteristics, including wetland characteristics and land cover (Wolfe et al. 2019a). Subsequent investigation of the hydrology of each watershed class (He et al. 2023) revealed that each displays different hydrological behaviours and sensitivity to climate. In this study, we focus on one of these classes, Pothole Till, which is the largest class by area (Fig. 1), features the highest wetland pond density (Wolfe et al. 2019a), and continues to experience widespread wetland drainage. The extent of wetland ponds is temporally dynamic and influenced by both climate and anthropogenic activities (Johnson et al. 2005; Doherty et al. 2018). We used the Global Surface Water dataset (Pekel et al. 2016) to characterize baseline wetland pond extent, which identifies water bodies on the landscape according to the presence of water during the 1980–2010 period.
Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Map (NAD1983, UTM zone 13 N) of the >4000 watersheds identified in the HydroSHEDS dataset (Lehner et al. 2008) across the Prairies ecozone of Canada, spanning the provinces of Alberta (AB), Saskatchewan (SK), and Manitoba (MB). The Pothole Till class (Wolfe et al. 2019b) is highlighted (blue polygons), and the location of the study area in Canada is shown on the inset map.

Modelling approach

The foundation of our analysis is a catchment classification-based virtual modelling approach. Using this approach, we modelled the typical sensitivity of ecosystem services to drainage of wetlands in the Pothole Till watershed class under a characteristic climate for the region. This approach has been tested and described in detail for assessing hydrological sensitivity to climate and wetland drainage (Spence et al. 2022a, 2022b; He et al. 2023). The foundation of this approach is the Cold Regions Hydrological Modelling Platform (Pomeroy et al. 2007; Pomeroy et al. 2022), which was used to simulate the hydrological behaviour of a typical Pothole Till watershed. The Cold Regions Hydrological Modelling Platform is a process-based, spatially semi-distributed hydrological model, featuring key cold region and warm season hydrological processes of import in this region. In this analysis, we build on the wetland drainage–based investigation described by Spence et al. (2022b).
Briefly, the Cold Regions Hydrological Modelling Platform was configured to represent the typical 100 km2 Pothole Till watershed. Hydrological response units are used in the model to represent the flow of water through the catena of land covers observed across the Pothole Till landscape (e.g., fallow fields, cultivated fields, grasslands, shrublands, woodlands, wetlands, and stream channels), and their fractional coverage was defined using the median of all watersheds in this class (e.g., Wolfe et al. 2019a). The virtual watershed model was set up to have (1) an effective area catena generating runoff directly to the stream, and (2) a non-effective area catena featuring a wetland complex composed of 46 wetlands where runoff from uplands is subject to depressional storage; routing order details for this structure are available in Spence et al. (2022b) and He et al. (2023). Forty-six wetlands were used, as this has been shown to be sufficient for representing wetland control of runoff transmission from Prairie watersheds (Pomeroy et al. 2014; Spence et al. 2022a), while also affording some parsimony. The effective and non-effective proportions of the watershed area and the wetland density (∼17 km–2) were established according to the typical character of the Pothole Till watershed class (Wolfe et al. 2019b). A generalized pareto distribution with shape and scale parameters of 0.87 and 2227, respectively (e.g., Spence et al. 2022b), was used to characterize individual wetland pond sizes. Runoff behaviour is scaled within the Cold Regions Hydrological Modelling Platform from a smaller area (∼2.7 km−2) representing effective and non-effective catenas where appropriate wetland density can be represented with 46 wetlands, to the 100 km2 Pothole Till watershed scale of interest.
Long-term simulations (46 years) of the virtual watershed were run with the Cold Regions Hydrological Modelling Platform using Adjusted and Homogenized Canadian Climate Data (Vincent et al. 2012) from Yorkton, Saskatchewan, which lies near the geographic centre of the Pothole Till class, as the forcing dataset. Because depressional water storage can have multi-year hydrological memory in this region, we excluded the first 5 years of the simulation, limiting our analysis to a 41-year period (1965–2005). The virtual watershed model was run for 11 different wetland drainage scenarios, from a baseline condition with no (0%) drainage to complete (100%) drainage, increasing by increments of 10%, with the wetland ponds drained by size, from smallest (low drainage scenarios) to largest (high drainage scenarios). This approach approximates drainage practices, which often target small, easy-to-drain wetland ponds first (Serran and Creed 2016). Further, Spence et al. (2022b) showed simulated hydrologic responses for the Pothole Till to be largely independent of the sequence of wetland drainage. These increments are nominal, as the wetland area drained was approximated to the nearest 10% according to the size of remaining wetland ponds available to drain in each subsequent scenario. In the model, water flows from wetlands when the depressional storage capacity is exceeded, mimicking the fill-and-spill behaviour characteristic of this landscape (Shaw et al. 2012), with spilling water flowing to downstream wetland depressions. When (former) wetland hydrologic response units are drained in one of the drainage scenarios, the depressional storage is set to zero and other parameters are changed to match those of cropland hydrologic response units, mimicking the land transformations occurring as part of agricultural wetland drainage (see also Spence et al. 2022b). Manning's n was similarly set to match that of the stream channel, on the assumption that wetland drainage leaves ditches between wetlands to rapidly convey water off the landscape.

Characterization of ecosystem service indicators

Hydrological ecosystem service indicators included surface water storage and upland runoff. Storage of surface water in wetland ponds was quantified for each scenario by identifying the annual daily maximum water stored in each pond (where drained ponds hold no water) and summing this across all (remaining) ponds. We also investigated potential changes to runoff from the watershed associated with different wetland drainage levels, using annual return period flows calculated using a rank technique (Spence and Mengistu 2019), as flood frequencies in the Canadian Prairie do not follow a single frequency distribution (Zhang et al. 2020). We report runoff depths for return periods from 1 in 2 (mean annual flood) to a maximum of 1 in 41 years, which is the upper limit we can quantify using model simulations for the period of record.
We investigated total phosphorus export as a biogeochemical ecosystem service indicator. This was investigated using the runoff amounts described above, estimated for each year and scenario. This analysis used available total phosphorus concentration data from 14 streams draining Pothole Till watersheds in Manitoba and Saskatchewan (Cavaliere et al. unpublished data; Fasching et al. 2019); data were collected between 2011 and 2015, with total observations for each site ranging from 24 to 49. Discharge–concentration relationships have been reported for various locales outside of the Prairies (e.g., O'Connor et al. 2011; Bowes et al. 2015), but evidence of these relationships for streams in the region is limited (Casson et al. 2019; Cavaliere et al. unpublished data), and thus we assume chemostasis. Peak daily flows from these sites (∼800 000 m3 day–1) were also comparable to but slightly higher than from our modelling (∼625 000 m3 day–1), possibly because these sites were in some cases larger (25–500 km2) than the virtual watershed used in our analysis (100 km2). Total phosphorus concentrations in these streams had relatively low seasonal variation (median concentrations of 233 and 294 µg L–1 for spring (March–May) and summer (June–September), respectively). Seasonal concentrations were used to calculate exports using modelled daily runoff during these periods. Winter (January–February) and fall (October–December) flows are extremely rare, so nutrient export during cold seasons is typically negligible. Nonetheless, we used spring and summer total phosphorus concentrations, respectively, and modelled daily flows to approximate the total phosphorus export associated with these small and infrequent events during winter and fall. Annual total phosphorus exports for all years and scenarios were calculated as the sum of daily exports.
We used pond riparian area as an indicator of ecosystem services provided by riparian habitat. To estimate the loss of pond riparian areas due to wetland drainage, we assume spherical ponds. As these pond areas can be quite dynamic, both within and among years, we used the 90th percentile of individual pond areas during the open-water season (April–September) across all years of each drainage scenario. Because the Cold Regions Hydrological Modelling Platform represents ponds as hydrologic response unit areas with a uniform depth, dynamic pond areas for each time step were calculated according to pond volume–area–depth relationships derived from sites in the Pothole Till watershed class (Hayashi and van der Kamp 2000) using CRHMr (Shook 2016; function: wetland_pond_area). Riparian buffer width was estimated from pond size, where width was set as the minimum of the square root of pond diameter, or 10 m (Fig. S1). Riparian area was then calculated as the difference in areas of the 90th percentile pond size plus the riparian buffer and the 90th percentile pond size.
Finally, the indicators of biodiversity ecosystem services were the numbers of breeding duck pairs and abundances of wetland-associated birds. These were calculated using statistical relationships with pond areas. Numbers of breeding pairs of five different dabbling duck species were calculated according to species-specific eqs. 15 from Bartzen et al. (2017):
Blue-winged teal=0.0777×DD×PA-0.0681×PD×PA+0.7018×PA+0.1732×PA
(1)
Gadwall=0.0635×DD×PA-0.0199×PD×PA+0.2392×PA+0.1066×PA
(2)
Mallard=0.0559×DD×PA-0.0630×PD×PA+0.8595×PA
(3)
Northernpintail=0.0419×DD×PA-0.0204×PD×PA+0.2584×PA+0.0375×PA
(4)
Northernshoveler=0.0701×DD×PA-0.0290×PD×PA+0.3437×PA
(5)
where DD, PA, and PD are conspecific duck density (6.56, 3.75, 9.79, 1.97, and 5.46, for eqs. 15, respectively), area of individual ponds, and pond density (10.5), respectively. The above equations were generated using 10 years of Waterfowl Breeding Population and Habitat Survey data for 1208 unique wetlands in the Canadian Prairie Pothole Region (see Bartzen et al. (2017) for details); this period spanned both historically dry and wet years on record. We used the mean pond size for each individual pond during 20 April to 10 June (which approximates the data collection periods) in each year and scenario. The number of dabbling ducks was summed across all ponds in the virtual Pothole Till watershed and reported here as population estimates on a per-area basis for the 100 km2 watershed. Similarly, we were able to quantify the abundance of wetland-associated birds (which does not explicitly include ducks) using a statistical relationship derived from observational data for 300 wetland pond sites in Alberta (see Mantyka‐Pringle et al. (2019) for details on these data):
Wetlandbirdabundance=29.83+19.21×zPA-5.08×zPA2
(6)
where zPA represents a normalized wetland pond area (pond area z-score), calculated for each individual pond and year. This relationship was expected to be applicable to other areas of the PPR (e.g., Bidwell et al. 2014; Elliott et al. 2020); however, we note that the exact form of this relationship could vary regionally due to changes in avian species composition. As with ducks, results were calculated for each pond and year and summed to provide an estimate for the Pothole Till watershed. For all ponds and scenarios, we used the mean and standard deviation of pond sizes (late April–early June) for all years of the baseline (0%) wetland pond drainage scenario to calculate zPA from Cold Regions Hydrological Modelling Platform simulations of pond sizes. This approach was used for two reasons: (1) the pond size distribution changes across each drainage scenario (e.g., one or more pond sizes become zero at each successively higher level of drainage), making it inappropriate to use pond areas normalized according to scenario-specific results to assess change across scenarios; and (2) the data informing this relationship were collected for conditions that reasonably approximate the baseline scenario (e.g., baseline scenario pond sizes are very infrequently (∼1% of instances) larger than the upper limit of pond size (∼30 000 m2) for which bird abundance estimates are available from eqs. 16).

Results

Water storage and return period flows were strongly affected by wetland pond drainage in our analysis. Water storage in depressional wetland ponds was highly variable across the 41-year simulation period, increasing by nearly an order of magnitude from the driest to the wettest years for the baseline drainage scenario (Fig. 2a). Changes in water storage in wetland ponds across drainage scenarios highlight that median and maximum storage years are more sensitive to drainage than minimum storage, as in dry years, wetland ponds are well below their storage capacity (often being empty), and the absolute loss of storage under dry conditions is much less than for wet conditions. Because wetland drainage typically uses a ditching approach where higher elevation wetlands are drained into lower ones, those remaining wetland ponds at higher levels of drainage store more water for median conditions than when the full complement of wetlands was present in the complex, but there is nonetheless a net loss of storage. This decrease in depressional water storage has important consequences for runoff generation from these Pothole Till watersheds. The median (1 in 2 years) runoff event increases from 14 mm with no wetland drainage to 43 mm with complete wetland drainage (Fig. 2b). Importantly, runoff amounts associated with more infrequent events demonstrate larger magnitude increases as the system progresses to higher levels of drainage. For example, when considering a change from no drainage (0%) to a scenario where all wetlands are removed (100%), 1 in 10 and 1 in 41 year events increase by 44 and 59 mm, respectively, compared to 29 mm for 1 in 2 year flow events.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. Simulated (a) annual maximum surface water storage in wetland ponds for different wetland drainage scenarios, with predictions for individual years shown as black circles (whiskers represent 1.5 interquartile range); and (b) depths of surface water released (runoff) from a 100 km2 Pothole Till watershed for different return periods and wetland drainage scenarios.
Our analysis reveals that there is a strong link between wetland drainage and nutrient export at landscape scales, owing in part to the chemostatic behaviour of Pothole Till watersheds. In a baseline scenario with no wetland drainage, the median total phosphorus export from a 100 km2 Pothole Till watershed based on our concentration assumptions is predicted to be 332 kg year−1 (blue line, Fig. 3), while more than double that amount is predicted where 60% of the wetland pond area has been drained. Importantly, while nutrient export is similar across all drainage scenarios in dry years (Fig. 3), the amount of nutrient export increases strongly with drainage for wetter years where depressional water storage in ponds is higher and ponds are at or near capacity following snowmelt, leading to more surface runoff. This contributes to higher interannual variability in total phosphorus export at higher levels of drainage (Fig. 3). Collectively, our results suggest that even at low levels of drainage, these land modifications can be expected to increase total phosphorus export for all but the driest years. Phosphorus export across a range of flow conditions can double with moderate levels of drainage, with potentially three times as much total phosphorus moving downstream when all wetland ponds are removed.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. Estimates of annual total phosphorus export from a 100 km2 Pothole Till watershed under different drainage scenarios, with individual years shown as black circles (whiskers represent 1.5 interquartile range). The lower (blue) horizontal line denotes median export from a baseline scenario with no drainage, while the upper (green) line indicates total phosphorus export double that of the median baseline estimate.
In addition to changes to ecosystem services associated with wetland drainage effects on surface hydrology and biogeochemistry, we also considered habitat implications by estimating the loss of riparian area. The approach to representing drainage in our scenarios meant that many small wetland ponds were removed at low drainage thresholds and fewer larger ones were removed at higher thresholds. Consequently, when evaluating the impact on riparian areas surrounding ponds, our results suggested that large decreases in riparian areas would occur as the first ∼30% of wetland ponds were drained (Fig. 4). In this analysis, because the remaining ponds receive more water from the landscape under drainage conditions than they would if there were more wetland ponds surrounding them, they are bigger on average. Our assumption in calculating these riparian areas is that they represent the long-term condition of these systems. Consequently, with progressively higher levels of drainage, the remaining wetland ponds become larger in area. This can lead to larger riparian areas than these same ponds had with little or no drainage, but this only partly compensates for the loss of riparian area around the more numerous drained ponds (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. Estimates of the loss of riparian area surrounding wetland ponds with different levels of wetland drainage. Note that only a single estimate is given for each scenario, as the riparian area of the wetland pond complex is expected to reflect the long-term pond behaviour.
Our analysis also investigated the potential response of both breeding ducks and wetland-associated birds to the drainage-driven loss of wetland ponds that provide habitat for these biota. Species-specific differences in response for ducks were apparent (Fig. 5a), with mallard exhibiting the sharpest decline in breeding duck abundance at low levels of wetland drainage and northern pintail being somewhat less sensitive than the other species. Despite these differences, for all species investigated, abundances were predicted to decrease by half for wetland drainage levels between 20% and 40%. When considering abundances of wetland-associated birds, we predicted even stronger response to wetland drainage than for breeding ducks, with populations decreasing by 75% with less than 50% of the wetland pond area drained (Fig. 5b). This is an important finding, as it highlights that bird populations are more sensitive to the loss of wetlands than the other ecosystem service indicators described above. We attribute this to smaller ponds initially being more abundant and having higher bird densities (per unit area of pond) than larger ponds. Consequently, because our analysis was designed to represent current drainage practices, which often prioritize small ponds for drainage owing to the relative ease with which they can be removed, much of the highest quality bird habitat ends up being drained in the first three drainage scenarios (10%–30%), with primarily larger ponds with less productive habitat remaining in drainage scenarios of 50% and above.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. Boxplots of predicted annual densities of (a) breeding pairs representing five species of dabbling ducks and (b) wetland-associated birds (excluding ducks) for different levels of wetland pond drainage in Pothole Till watersheds (whiskers represent 1.5 interquartile range).

Discussion

There has been a wealth of research documenting the impacts of wetland drainage in this region. Baulch et al. (2021) recently synthesized this knowledge in an effort to characterize the magnitude of impacts and describe the confidence in these effects occurring. Our novel analysis builds on this knowledge, and is among the first to quantify changes to multiple ecosystem services when pothole wetlands are drained in the Canadian Prairie Pothole Region. Using the Pothole Till class as the focus of the modelling framework to provide regional context, our predictions indicate that the five ecosystem service indicators investigated were all strongly impacted by wetland drainage but that the magnitude of the impact varied. Importantly, there were notable changes immediately once drainage began for all of the ecosystem services investigated. Here we provide context for our results by exploring the role of wetland drainage with regard to regional water resources, habitat, and economics. We also provide an overview of the limitations of our approach as well as opportunities for further use of it.

Water resources

The study area spans parts of a region that suffers from numerous water security pressures (Gober and Wheater 2014), and our results highlight the added risk to water resources coincident with wetland drainage. The hydrography of the Canadian prairie region is complex and highly disconnected. Wetland drainage will fundamentally alter the hydrological behaviour. As wetlands are drained, the connected area increases (Spence et al. 2022b). With an increasing number of channels dug to remove water from the landscape, depressional water storage (e.g., in wetland ponds; Fig. 2) is lost. We illustrate here important changes in return period flows resulting from an increasingly connected landscape with wetland drainage, and increasing the water yield from small watersheds will contribute to downstream flooding, as reported extensively in the media (e.g., CBC News 2014; Saskatoon StarPhoenix 2015; Simes 2023). Flooding may occur locally at the scales we have modelled, but at larger scales, the cumulative impact of draining numerous wetland basins across multiple watersheds is also an important consideration and one that warrants further investigation. Drainage of wetlands across many watersheds of the scale we modelled here is expected to have additive and potentially synergistic effects. Our modelling framework, however, is not suited to predicting the flooded areas resulting from wetland drainage, both because our models are virtual in nature and because hydraulic models are needed to capture riverine processes that the Cold Regions Hydrological Modelling Platform is not designed for. That said, our results imply that removing 50% of the wetland area results in the 1:41 year flood occurring more than four times as often (Fig. 2b), with concomitant impacts on flooding costs.
Coincident with the increasing movement of surface water as wetlands are drained, is the increased likelihood that high nutrient export will occur when conditions are sufficiently wet. This is an important concern in this region with naturally nutrient-rich lakes and waterbodies (Quinlan et al. 2002), with already substantive issues of harmful algal blooms. Edge-of-field total phosphorus export is highly variable, but seems to centre around ∼0.25 kg ha−1 for Prairie sites (Liu et al. 2021), which is higher than our watershed scale estimates herein, even under complete wetland loss (∼0.1 kg ha−1). Estimates of nutrient runoff are sensitive to local runoff concentrations (our analysis uses median concentrations); hence, areas of higher (or lower) impact should be expected. Differences between edge-of-field and watershed-scale nutrient export estimates can also be attributed to more diverse land uses at the larger spatial scale considered in our analysis. The presence of grassland and shrubland areas where total phosphorus export may be lower than cropland, and other features, including wetlands with notable areal coverage at the watershed scale, can contribute to lower estimates. Ultimately, evidence of higher edge-of-field nutrient runoff estimates suggests our watershed scale estimates could be underestimated.
The magnitude of the increase in phosphorus export driven by wetland drainage, although uncertain, is clearly substantive. This increase is expected to have important ecological effects that can cascade through aquatic ecosystems. Algal blooms, while not a new phenomenon to the region, are increasingly topical and, in recent years, have disrupted drinking water treatment processes, leading to challenges in supplying major cities with adequate water supplies (Williams et al. 2019). Our results indicate that nutrient (phosphorus) export is expected to increase with higher levels of wetland drainage in all but the driest years (when conditions are too dry for the landscape to become hydrologically connected); if half of the historical complement of wetlands is lost, P export is predicted to approximately double. These estimates, however, do not account for changing fertilizer inputs and other changes associated with the drainage and cultivation of wetlands; hence, the real magnitude of change is likely to be greater than shown herein. Downstream mobilization of phosphorus associated with wetland drainage is a critically important consideration in a region where the agricultural industry has a strong focus on beneficial management practices. Importantly, many of these practices have limited efficacy in this cold, snowmelt-dominated region (Baulch et al. 2019). It remains unproven that any tools (beneficial management practices or otherwise), either alone or in concert, could be implemented in a way that can counteract what is anticipated to be a massive increase in nutrient delivery to lakes and other water bodies associated with the loss of wetlands from the landscape.

Habitat

There is a direct link between wetland drainage and loss of habitat. Our predictions highlight the loss of riparian areas, dabbling ducks, and wetland-associated birds with progressive loss of areas of ponded water, showing their high sensitivity to drainage (Fig. 6). The analysis showed immediate and rapid loss of birds occurs as small wetland ponds are drained first, producing a pattern that begins to level off at moderate and high drainage levels when the wetland complex features only larger ponds, and very few of these organisms remain (Fig. 5). When considering the requirements of dabbling ducks and other wetland-associated birds, small ponds support higher bird densities (Bartzen et al. 2017), although wetland complexes composed of ponds of varying size and permanence are needed to meet the requirements of a diverse prairie waterbird community (e.g., Elliott et al. 2020). In our analysis, which removes wetlands in order of increasing size, the loss of water storage capacity in these small wetlands results in the remaining wetland ponds receiving more water. The hydrological behaviour of this system dictates that ponds that are present at higher drainage thresholds tend to be larger and deeper as more wetlands are drained, and consequently, they support lower densities of birds than prior to drainage, owing to strong and well-established relationships between pond size and bird abundances (Bidwell et al. 2014). At these higher drainage levels, where remaining wetlands are larger and more lake-like, dramatic changes in species composition are also expected (e.g., Elliott et al. 2020).
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6. Summary of the magnitude of ecosystem services responses to wetland drainage in Pothole Till watersheds of the Canadian prairie (see Table S1 for the data depicted in this figure).
Unlike our analyses for nutrients and water, the mobility of biota can lead to interactive effects with adjacent watersheds. While our models allow for the movement of birds with changing pond area dynamics, (limited) relocation to habitat in undrained adjacent watersheds is possible but would be biased toward species tolerant of reduced habitat heterogeneity and subject to limits imposed via competition for available resources. Our models did not include these spatial scale effects, or those that could become evident as an increasing number of wetland basins are drained and converted to cropland, lengthening distances between wetland ponds. As fewer wetlands are retained in the landscape, wetland ponds become more isolated, and local complexes of wetlands needed to attract and support some bird species may become disfunctional (Fairbairn and Dinsmore 2001; Naugle et al. 2001; Blann et al. 2009). Wetland isolation might strongly affect species with relatively low mobility, such as amphibians (Lehtinen et al. 1999; Environment Canada 2012 [leopard frog]; Ruso et al. 2019). Importantly, these effects could accentuate biotic impacts and changes in community composition, especially at lower wetland retention levels.
Our focus here has been on dabbling ducks and wetland-associated birds, but it is important to acknowledge that riparian habitat loss at pond margins will have a profound impact on a wider range of biota. Wetland margins represent the only remaining natural upland cover in many intensively cropped landscapes, and can be important reservoirs for beneficial invertebrate populations, including predatory arthropods (Robinson et al. 2021) and pollinators (Vickruck et al. 2019). It is possible that margins lower contaminant exports from ponds via emerging aquatic insects (Kraus et al. 2021), as riparian buffers serve to reduce agrochemical runoff to pond water (Main et al. 2015). For agrochemical runoff reaching pothole ponds, these inundated areas also play an important role in enhancing the breakdown of pesticides via photolysis (Zeng and Arnold 2013). Aquatic insects can provide highly nutritious foods for terrestrial species such as bats and birds using these riparian areas (Hixson et al. 2015; Twining et al. 2016). Species that rely strongly on wetland ponds, such as amphibians, will be seriously impacted by wetland riparian habitat loss, altered wetland function and quality, and greater wetland isolation as drainage progresses. Even large ungulates often select for wetland habitats in prairie landscapes for shelter, food, and water (e.g., LaForge et al. 2016), so the removal of wooded riparian areas could concentrate animals in less remaining habitat and eventually produce density-related reductions in survival and reproduction (Bonenfant et al. 2009). Key resources associated with wetland ponds and adjacent riparian habitats may explain why some species can occur in intensively cropped agroecosystems (Janke et al. 2019; Nelson and Gillan 2020; Berzins et al. 2022). The potential for broad impacts on wetland riparian habitat and the associated benefits these habitats can provide to the agroecosystem, in concert with changes to water resources, suggest the need for a more comprehensive understanding of the economic pressures around wetland pond drainage.

Economics

The major impetus for draining pothole wetlands is private benefit to the landowner. Depending on their size and location, wetland ponds can reduce field trafficability, increase the time required to seed, fertilize, and harvest, and lead to higher input costs where equipment size is not ideally suited. Draining wetlands reduces both field obstruction costs and the opportunity cost of non-productive land (Cortus et al. 2011; Lawley 2014). The profitability of cultivating drained wetlands in the Canadian PPR, however, is highly variable for individual wetlands and, in some cases, leads to financial losses (Clare et al. 2021). In contrast, ecosystem services provided by pothole wetlands can be highly valuable (e.g., Dias and Belcher 2015; Pattison-Williams et al. 2018), and the impacts associated with drainage, some of which have been quantified here, can be costly to society. Cropland expansion in the United States is associated with increasingly marginal yields, and costs to wildlife are high (Lark et al. 2020). While there is inherent uncertainty around these costs and benefits (e.g., Hansen and Loesch 2017), a challenge also lies in there being a mismatch between those who bear the costs of wetland conservation and those who benefit (Dias and Belcher 2015). This can contribute to enduring conflict (Breen et al. 2018). While there are inherent uncertainties in quantifying and valuing ecosystem services, and these uncertainties can be an obstacle to assessing tradeoffs among land-use decisions (Johnson et al. 2012), there nonetheless remains a strong need for further efforts to both quantify and use economic approaches to value pothole wetlands. The Canadian prairie region features a range of approaches to wetland management, from no net loss (of wetland area) (e.g., Manitoba) to widespread permitting of wetland drainage (e.g., Saskatchewan). Given the examples herein of the loss of ecosystem services when both small and large wetland ponds are lost, these approaches can be expected to contribute to the loss of ecosystem services, but in different ways. In some instances, e.g., Saskatchewan's forthcoming agricultural water stewardship policy, economic analyses of wetland drainage consider only private benefits to landowners. Thus, there remains a strong need to comprehensively value the direct and indirect costs of wetland loss to allow for those costs to society to be pragmatically weighed against the benefits of wetland drainage that currently accrue for private landowners pursuing this practice. This approach is needed to better inform and design wetland conservation policy measures. The costs of habitat restoration and species recovery are generally far more costly and difficult than protecting existing habitat. These costs and others, including the costs of flooding and efforts to reduce nutrient loading, are rarely considered in long-term economic assessments of wetland loss resulting from agricultural expansion.

Limitations and next steps

We focused herein on key biophysical ecosystem services, spanning provisioning (waterfowl), regulating (water storage, nutrient retention), and supporting (habitat) ecosystem services. These are among the biophysical services identified previously as being at risk of impact due to pothole wetland drainage (Baulch et al. 2021). While we believe that this analysis effectively examines the potential severity of the loss of ecosystem services, it stops short of quantifying other services, for example, supporting services such as carbon storage, floral resources, or amphibian habitat that have been investigated for U.S. regions of the Prairie Pothole Region (Mushet and Roth 2020). We have likewise not investigated the loss of cultural services here, including recreational experiences, and the significance of wetlands to Indigenous peoples (e.g., Clarkson et al. 2013; Department of the Environment 2016). In contrast, drained wetlands are typically replaced with cropland, which can provide other ecosystem services; however, these are widespread on this landscape and would not add to the diversity of services provided. It can be inferred that there would be at best a close to one-to-one replacement with land used to grow plants for human or animal consumption, and we have not included this potential for ecosystem service switching in our analysis.
It is worth noting that our approach is one designed to typify the behaviour of a watershed class. This is advantageous in that it allows us to regionalize behaviour on a very local scale (e.g., 100 km2 is the scale of a few large farms). The tradeoff, however, is that this approach does not capture very well the potential range in loss of ecosystem services with wetland drainage for a particular watershed class. For example, we could expect that within the Pothole Till class, for (real) watersheds with an areal wetland coverage higher than that modelled here, we would see greater absolute loss of ecosystem services (e.g., water storage, total phosphorus export, bird abundance) with each additional level of drainage. The converse would be true of locations with a somewhat lower proportion of wetlands naturally present on the landscape than modelled here. Further, while we limit our analysis to a single representative climate station for the Pothole Till class, the analysis is deliberate in its use of the highest quality climate record available, which, at a length of more than 40 years, captures much of the most extreme variability observed to date. Given the inherent interannual variability in this region, which alternates between multi-year wet and dry phases, analysis of this length of record allows us to capture the dynamic behaviour of multiple wet and dry phases, including the most severe drought on record. We caution that, given the climatic variability within the region, this analysis should not be expected to illustrate the full range in watershed response to drainage for this class. The behaviour illustrated (e.g., Figs. 2 and 3) could be expected to shift somewhat should the analysis be repeated using a drier or wetter climate station lying closer to the periphery of the Pothole Till watershed class (e.g., to lower or high ranges, respectively). Nonetheless, given strong natural temporal variability from wet, well-connected conditions to dry conditions with limited runoff generation at local scales, the interannual variability shown here is likely to capture much of the spatial variability associated with the region. As such, these data should not be used to provide local scale assessments, but instead are expected to provide a robust representation of change at large spatial scales. We also rely on several assumptions in our analysis, most notably that ponds are round, to estimate riparian areas. While this will not be strictly true, it was a suitable simplification to approximate these relationships. We also acknowledge that our predictions are associated with the strength of the underlying hydrological modelling. He et al. (2023) explore this for the virtual-watershed hydrological modelling in some detail, illustrating that the modelling framework is robust. Given the importance of the hydrological behaviour of this landscape to the characterization of ecosystem services, we believe our approach, featuring robust hydrological representation, provides a strong underpinning to our work. Our focus on strong hydrological representation confers advantages over other off-the-shelf approaches that do not capture water storage and potential changes in water movement associated with the loss of wetlands and do not capture the dynamic interannual behaviour of wetlands.
In future work, our analysis could be extended to larger scale ecological models that can account for potential indirect effects. This could include, for example, the impact on ecosystems in other regions that could see fewer migrating birds as wetlands are drained. Given the large magnitude of impacts quantified through this analysis, extending this work to consider the economic value of the loss of ecosystem services should be pursued. This might include quantifying the potential for indirect economic impacts, e.g., tourism associated with duck hunting, as one example. While we have not quantified changes to carbon storage here, loss of carbon with wetland drainage is expected, given that cultivated wetland depressions have much lower carbon stores than uncultivated ones (Bedard-Haughn et al. 2006); however, the magnitude of impacts to greenhouse gas budgets for these systems has not yet been described with certainty (Baulch et al. 2021). Improved estimates of the impact on carbon storage and net climate forcing as pothole ponds are drained and converted to agriculture warrant a fuller investigation. With rising interest in maintaining natural carbon sequestration capacity, future assessments of the loss of ecosystem services using this framework should be expanded to include this aspect. We also acknowledge that our approach to nutrient export modelling is based on evidence of chemostatic phosphorus behaviour in the region and does not include explicit process representation. While available evidence suggests that water volume is the key control on phosphorus export, given evidence of higher edge-of-field total phosphorus export than reported herein at the watershed scale, further examination of how the role of wetland density, their connectivity, and water residence times in individual wetlands can affect nutrient retention in these systems should be considered in future work. Similarly, further work to understand and simulate drivers of localized variation in runoff chemistry will help refine our understanding of downstream impacts on aquatic ecosystems.
Finally, as a region undergoing strong climate change, our modelled response to wetland drainage for a period spanning the last half of the twentieth century may not reflect the consequences of wetland drainage under warmer and perhaps wetter or drier conditions. Wetland-driven evapotranspiration contributes to moisture recirculation and several degrees of cooling in wetland-rich areas (e.g., Zhang et al. 2022), with the potential that loss of these features can exacerbate hot and dry conditions and further raise water use demand (e.g., through irrigation). These interactions are important, as predictions of the change in bird abundance associated with pond conditions in different parts of the Prairie Pothole Region under future climate have suggested both decreases (e.g., Sorenson et al. 1998) and increases (McIntyre et al. 2019) are possible. Examining how wetland drainage can be expected to affect ecosystem services under future climate conditions in the region should be considered in future analyses. In this regard, we see a need to extend this analysis from the Pothole Till to other watershed classes that exhibit a range in wetland coverage (Wolfe et al. 2019a), hydrological behaviours, and sensitivity to climate (He et al. 2023).

Conclusions

Despite the widely known value of wetlands for society, wetland drainage in the Canadian portion of the Prairie Pothole Region is part of rapid agricultural practice change. Rates of wetland loss due to drainage were estimated at 10 800 ha year−1 (Watmough et al. 2017) during a period (2001–2011) that tended to be dry to neutral, and may have increased since given the wettest conditions on record in the following decade. We have quantified for the first time at a regional scale how several ecosystem services are expected to be lost due to wetland drainage in small watersheds (Fig. 6). With water storage, habitat, and bird populations predicted to decrease at wetland drainage levels as low as 10% by area and increases in runoff and nutrient export also shown at low drainage thresholds, it is clear that there are substantive tradeoffs between draining wetlands to increase the area under agricultural production, and resulting local- and regional-scale impacts resulting from these practices. Because the region experiences strong interannual (or interdecadal) variability associated with climate phases, year-to-year conditions are often quite different. This makes monitoring change difficult, and can also mean that the types of impacts quantified here are not readily observed by people as they may be in other systems. Communicating this magnitude of change in ecosystem services associated with wetland loss is therefore difficult but important because changes to ecosystem services associated with land use should inform land management decisions. While our analysis does not offer an exhaustive investigation of large numbers of ecosystem services, we have focused on those of key import in this region. What remains more uncertain, however, are the longer-term biological and biogeochemical implications of altering a system with high hydrological disconnection, to one that is connected. The potential for nonlinear impacts at regional scales remains a key unknown. With the large magnitude of change in ecosystem services identified through this work, extensions to quantify these patterns across the broader Canadian Prairie Pothole Region and the use of economic valuation methods to better inform wetland management decision-making are important avenues for future work.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support for this work provided by the Canada First Research Excellence Fund to Global Water Futures. Additional support was provided via the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada ResNet (HMB) and Discovery Grants (CJW). We appreciate the valuable input and discussions on this work from our partners on the Prairie Water project, and constructive feedback from three anonymous reviewers.

References

Awada L., Lindwall C.W., Sonntag B. 2014. The development and adoption of conservation tillage systems on the Canadian Prairies. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 2(1): 47–65.
Bartzen B., Dufour K.W., Bidwell M.T., Watmough M.D., Clark R.G. 2017. Relationships between abundances of breeding ducks and attributes of Canadian prairie wetlands. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 41(3): 416–423.
Baulch H., Whitfield C., Wolfe J., Basu N., Bedard-Haughn A., Belcher K., et al. 2021. Synthesis of science: findings on Canadian Prairie wetland drainage. Canadian Water Resources Journal/Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques, 46(4): 229–241.
Baulch H.M., Elliott J.A., Cordeiro M.R.C., Flaten D.N., Lobb D.A., Wilson H.F. 2019. Soil and water management: opportunities to mitigate nutrient losses to surface waters in the Northern Great Plains. Environmental Reviews, 27(4): 447–477.
Bedard-Haughn A., Jongbloed F., Akkerman J., Uijl A., de Jong E., Yates T., et al. 2006. The effects of erosional and management history on soil organic carbon stores in ephemeral wetlands of hummocky agricultural landscapes. Geoderma 135: 296–306.
Berzins L.L., Morrissey C.A., Howerter D.W., Clark R.G. 2022. Conserving wetlands in agroecosystems can sustain aerial insectivore productivity and survival. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 100(10): 617–629.
Bidwell M.T., Green A.J., Clark R.G. 2014. Random placement models predict species–area relationships in duck communities despite species aggregation. Oikos, 123(12): 1499–1508.
Blann K.L., Sands G.R., Anderson J.L., Vondracek B. 2009. Effects of agricultural drainage on aquatic ecosystems: a review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 39(11): 909–1001.
Bonenfant C., Gaillard J.-M., Coulson T., Festa-Bianchet M., Loison A., Garel M., et al. 2009. Chapter 5. Empirical evidence of density-dependence in populations of large herbivores. Academic Press. pp. 313–357.
Bowes M.J., Jarvie H.P., Halliday S.J., Skeffington R.A., Wade A.J., Loewenthal M., et al. 2015. Characterising phosphorus and nitrate inputs to a rural river using high-frequency concentration–flow relationships. Science of The Total Environment, 511: 608–620.
Breen S.-P.W., Loring P.A., Baulch H. 2018. When a water problem is more than a water problem: fragmentation, framing, and the case of agricultural wetland drainage. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 6.
Casson N.J., Wilson H.F., Higgins S.M. 2019. Hydrological and seasonal controls of phosphorus in Northern Great Plains agricultural streams. Journal of Environmental Quality, 48(4): 978–987.
CBC News. 2014. Drained wetlands contribute to Prairie summer floods, says expert CBC News.
Clare S., Danielson B., Koenig S., Pattison-Williams J.K. 2021. Does drainage pay? Quantifying agricultural profitability associated with wetland drainage practices and canola production in Alberta. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 29(3): 397–415.
Clarkson B.R., Ausseil A.-G.E., Gerbeaux P. 2013. Wetland ecosystem services. In Ecosystem services in New Zealand: conditions and trends. Vol. 1. Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln, 192–202.
Cortus B.G., Jeffrey S.R., Unterschultz J.R., Boxall P.C. 2011. The economics of wetland drainage and retention in Saskatchewan. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, 59(1): 109–126.
Davidson N.C. 2014. How much wetland has the world lost? Long-term and recent trends in global wetland area. Marine and Freshwater Research, 65(10): 934–941.
De Laporte A. 2014. Effects of crop prices, nuisance costs, and wetland regulation on Saskatchewan NAWMP implementation goals. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, 62(1): 47–67.
Department of the Environment. 2016. Wetlands and Indigenous values. Australian Government.
Dias V., Belcher K. 2015. Value and provision of ecosystem services from prairie wetlands: a choice experiment approach. Ecosystem Services, 15: 35–44.
Doherty K.E., Howerter D.W., Devries J.H., Walker J. 2018. Prairie Pothole Region of North America. In The wetland book: II: distribution, description, and conservation. Edited by C.M. Finlayson, G.R. Milton, R.C. Prentice, N.C. Davidson. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht. pp. 679–688.
Elliott L.H., Igl L.D., Johnson D.H. 2020. The relative importance of wetland area versus habitat heterogeneity for promoting species richness and abundance of wetland birds in the Prairie Pothole Region, USA. The Condor, 122(1): duz060.
Environment Canada. 2012. Management Plan for the Northern Leopard Frog (Lithobates pipiens), Western Boreal/Prairie Populations, in Canada [Proposed] Species at Risk Act Management Plan Series Environment Canada, Ottawa, Canada.
Fairbairn S.E., Dinsmore J.J. 2001. Local and landscape-level influences on wetland bird communities of the prairie pothole region of Iowa, USA. Wetlands, 21(1): 41–47.
Fasching C., Wilson H.F., D'Amario S.C., Xenopoulos M.A. 2019. Natural land cover in agricultural catchments alters flood effects on DOM composition and decreases nutrient levels in streams. Ecosystems, 22(7): 1530–1545.
Foley J.A., DeFries R., Asner G.P., Barford C., Bonan G., Carpenter S.R., et al. 2005. Global consequences of land use. Science, 309(5734): 570–574.
Foley J.A., Ramankutty N., Brauman K.A., Cassidy E.S., Gerber J.S., Johnston M., et al. 2011. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature, 478(7369): 337–342.
Gober P., Wheater H.S. 2014. Socio-hydrology and the science–policy interface: a case study of the Saskatchewan River basin. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 18(4): 1413–1422.
Gray D.M., Landine P.G. 1988. An energy-budget snowmelt model for the Canadian Prairies. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 25(8): 1292–1303.
Greenwood R.J., Sargeant A.B., Johnson D.H., Cowardin L.M., Shaffer T.L. 1995. Factors associated with duck nest success in the prairie pothole region of Canada. Wildlife Monographs, 128: 3–57.
Hansen L., Loesch C. 2017. Targeting waterfowl habitat restoration in the Prairie Pothole Region: a spatial analysis of marginal benefits and costs. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 72(4): 299–307.
Hayashi M., van der Kamp G. 2000. Simple equations to represent the volume–area–depth relations of shallow wetlands in small topographic depressions. Journal of Hydrology, 237(1): 74–85.
He Z., Shook K., Spence C., Pomeroy J.W., Whitfield C. 2023. Modelling the regional sensitivity of snowmelt, soil moisture, and streamflow generation to climate over the Canadian Prairies using a basin classification approach. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 27(19): 3525–3546.
Hixson S.M., Sharma B., Kainz M.J., Wacker A., Arts M.T. 2015. Production, distribution, and abundance of long-chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids: a fundamental dichotomy between freshwater and terrestrial ecosystems. Environmental Reviews, 23(4): 414–424.
Janke A.K., Anteau M.J., Stafford J.D. 2019. Prairie wetlands confer consistent migrant refueling conditions across a gradient of agricultural land use intensities. Biological Conservation, 229: 99–112.
Johnson K.A., Polasky S., Nelson E., Pennington D. 2012. Uncertainty in ecosystem services valuation and implications for assessing land use tradeoffs: an agricultural case study in the Minnesota River Basin. Ecological Economics, 79: 71–79.
Johnson W.C., Millett B.V., Gilmanov T., Voldseth R.A., Guntenspergen G.R., Naugle D.E. 2005. Vulnerability of northern prairie wetlands to climate change. Bioscience, 55(10): 863–872.
Kraus J.M., Kuivila K.M., Hladik M.L., Shook N., Mushet D.M., Dowdy K., Harrington R. 2021. Cross-ecosystem fluxes of pesticides from prairie wetlands mediated by aquatic insect emergence: implications for terrestrial insectivores. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 40(8): 2282–2296.
Laforge M.P., Michel N.L., Wheeler A.L., Brook R.K. 2016. Habitat selection by female moose in the Canadian prairie ecozone. Journal of Wildlife Management, 80(6): 1059–1068.
Lark T.J., Spawn S.A., Bougie M., Gibbs H.K. 2020. Cropland expansion in the United States produces marginal yields at high costs to wildlife. Nature Communications, 11(1): 4295.
Lawley C. 2014. Changes in implicit prices of prairie pothole habitat. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62(2): 171–190.
Lehner B., Verdin K.L., Jarvis A. 2008. New global hydrography derived from spaceborne elevation data. EoS Transactions, 89(10): 93–94.
Lehtinen R.M., Galatowitsch S.M., Tester J.R. 1999. Consequences of habitat loss and fragmentation for wetland amphibian assemblages. Wetlands, 19(1): 1–12.
Leibowitz S.G., Vining K.C. 2003. Temporal connectivity in a prairie pothole complex. Wetlands, 23(1): 13–25.
Liu J., Elliott J.A., Wilson H.F., Macrae M.L., Baulch H.M., Lobb D.A. 2021. Phosphorus runoff from Canadian agricultural land: a cross-region synthesis of edge-of-field results. Agricultural Water Management, 255: 107030.
Main A.R., Michel N.L., Headley J.V., Peru K.M., Morrissey C.A. 2015. Ecological and landscape drivers of neonicotinoid insecticide detections and concentrations in Canada's prairie wetlands. Environmental Science & Technology, 49(14): 8367–8376.
Malinga R., Gordon L.J., Jewitt G., Lindborg R. 2015. Mapping ecosystem services across scales and continents—a review. Ecosystem Services, 13: 57–63.
Mantyka‐Pringle C., Leston L., Messmer D., Asong E., Bayne E.M., Bortolotti L.E., et al. 2019. Antagonistic, synergistic and direct effects of land use and climate on Prairie wetland ecosystems: ghosts of the past or present? Diversity and Distributions, 25(12): 1924–1940.
McIntyre N.E., Liu G., Gorzo J., Wright C.K., Guntenspergen G.R., Schwartz F. 2019. Simulating the effects of climate variability on waterbodies and wetland-dependent birds in the Prairie Pothole Region. Ecosphere, 10(4): e02711.
Mekis É., Vincent L.A. 2011. An overview of the second generation adjusted daily precipitation dataset for trend analysis in Canada. Atmosphere-Ocean, 49(2): 163–177.
Minnes S., Gaspard V., Loring P.A., Baulch H., Breen S.-P. 2020. Transforming conflict over natural resources: a socio-ecological systems analysis of agricultural drainage. FACETS, 5(1): 864–886.
Montoya D., Gaba S., Mazancourt C., Bretagnolle V., Loreau M. 2020. Reconciling biodiversity conservation, food production and farmers’ demand in agricultural landscapes. Ecological Modelling, 416: 108889.
Morton F.I. 1983. Operational estimates of lake evaporation. Journal of Hydrology, 66(1): 77–100.
Mushet D.M., Roth C.L. 2020. Modeling the supporting ecosystem services of depressional wetlands in agricultural landscapes. Wetlands, 40(5): 1061–1069.
Naugle D.E., Johnson R.R., Estey M.E., Higgins K.F. 2001. A landscape approach to conserving wetland bird habitat in the prairie pothole region of eastern South Dakota. Wetlands, 21(1): 1–17.
Nedkov S., Campagne S., Borisova B., Krpec P., Prodanova H., Kokkoris I.P., et al. 2022. Modeling water regulation ecosystem services: a review in the context of ecosystem accounting. Ecosystem Services, 56: 101458.
Nelson J.J., Gillam E.H. 2020. Influences of landscape features on bat activity in North Dakota. Journal of Wildlife Management, 84(2): 382–389.
O'Connor E.M., McConnell C., Lembcke D., Winter J.G. 2011. Estimation of total phosphorus loads for a large, flashy river of a highly developed watershed—seasonal and hysteresis effects. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 37: 26–35.
Office of the Parliamentary Budget Officer. 2016. Estimate of the average annual cost for disaster financial assistance arrangements due to weather events. Government of Canada, Ottawa, Canada.
Pattison-Williams J.K., Pomeroy J.W., Badiou P., Gabor S. 2018. Wetlands, flood control and ecosystem services in the Smith Creek Drainage Basin: a case study in Saskatchewan, Canada. Ecological Economics, 147: 36–47.
Pekel J.-F., Cottam A., Gorelick N., Belward A.S. 2016. High-resolution mapping of global surface water and its long-term changes. Nature, 540(7633): 418–422.
Pomeroy J.W., Brown T., Fang X., Shook K.R., Pradhananga D., Armstrong R., et al. 2022. The cold regions hydrological modelling platform for hydrological diagnosis and prediction based on process understanding. Journal of Hydrology, 615: 128711.
Pomeroy J.W., Gray D.M., Brown T., Hedstrom N.R., Quinton W.L., Granger R.J., Carey S.K. 2007. The cold regions hydrological model: a platform for basing process representation and model structure on physical evidence. Hydrological Processes, 21(19): 2650–2667.
Pomeroy J.W., Shook K.R., Fang X., Dumanski S., Westbrook C., Brown T. 2014. Improving and testing the prairie hydrological model at Smith Creek Research Basin. Centre for Hydrology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Power A.G. 2010. Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 365(1554): 2959–2971.
Quinlan R., Leavitt P.R., Dixit A.S., Hall R.I., Smol J.P. 2002. Landscape effects of climate, agriculture, and urbanization on benthic invertebrate communities of Canadian prairie lakes. Limnology & Oceanography, 47(2): 378–391.
Robinson S.V.J., Edwards D., Vickruck J.L., Best L.R., Galpern P. 2021. Non-crop sources of beneficial arthropods vary within-season across a prairie agroecosystem. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 320: 107581.
Ruso G.E., Morrissey C.A., Hogan N.S., Sheedy C., Gallant M.J., Jardine T.D. 2019. Detecting amphibians in agricultural landscapes using environmental DNA reveals the importance of wetland condition. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 38(12): 2750–2763.
Saskatoon StarPhoenix. 2015. Province urged to act on wetlands damage. Saskatoon StarPhoenix.
Schröter M., Remme R.P., Sumarga E., Barton D.N., Hein L. 2015. Lessons learned for spatial modelling of ecosystem services in support of ecosystem accounting. Ecosystem Services, 13: 64–69.
Serran J.N., Creed I.F. 2016. New mapping techniques to estimate the preferential loss of small wetlands on prairie landscapes. Hydrological Processes, 30(3): 396–409.
Shaw D.A., Vanderkamp G., Conly F.M., Pietroniro A., Martz L. 2012. The fill–spill hydrology of prairie wetland complexes during drought and deluge. Hydrological Processes, 26(20): 3147–3156.
Shook K., Pomeroy J., van der Kamp G. 2015. The transformation of frequency distributions of winter precipitation to spring streamflow probabilities in cold regions; case studies from the Canadian Prairies. Journal of Hydrology, 521: 395–409.
Shook K.R. 2016. CRHMr: pre- and post- processing for CRHM. R.
Simes J. 2023. “We need wetlands”: Saskatchewan environmental groups concerned over drainage plan. National Post.
Sorenson L.G., Goldberg R., Root T.L., Anderson M.G. 1998. Potential effects of global warming on waterfowl populations breeding in the Northern Great Plains. Climatic Change, 40(2): 343–369.
Spence C., Mengistu S.G. 2019. On the relationship between flood and contributing area. Hydrological Processes, 33(14): 1980–1992.
Spence C., He Z., Shook K.R., Mekonnen B.A., Pomeroy J.W., Whitfield C.J., Wolfe J.D. 2022a. Assessing hydrological sensitivity of grassland basins in the Canadian Prairies to climate using a basin classification-based virtual modelling approach. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 26(7): 1801–1819.
Spence C., He Z., Shook K.R., Pomeroy J.W., Whitfield C.J., Wolfe J.D. 2022b. Assessing runoff sensitivity of North American Prairie Pothole Region basins to wetland drainage using a basin classification-based virtual modelling approach. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 26(21): 5555–5575.
Statistics Canada. 2022. Table 32-10-0153-01 land use, census of agriculture historical data.
Steffen W., Richardson K., Rockström J., Cornell S.E., Fetzer I., Bennett E.M., et al. 2015. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347(6223): 1259855.
Stewart R.E., Kantrud H.A. 1971. Classification of natural ponds and lakes in the glaciated prairie region. US Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife.
Stichling W., Blackwell S.R. 1957. Drainage area as a hydrologic factor on the Canadian prairies. Prairie Farm Rehabilitation Administration, Regina, SK. pp. 17.
Stunden Bower S. 2011. Wet prairie: people, land, and water in agricultural Manitoba. UBC Press, Vancouver, BC.
Twining C.W., Brenna J.T., Lawrence P., Shipley J.R., Tollefson T.N., Winkler D.W. 2016. Omega-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids support aerial insectivore performance more than food quantity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(39): 10920–10925.
Vickruck J.L., Best L.R., Gavin M.P., Devries J.H., Galpern P., 2019. Pothole wetlands provide reservoir habitat for native bees in prairie croplands. Biological Conservation 232: 43–50.
Vincent L.A., Wang X.L., Milewska E.J., Wan H., Yang F., Swail V. 2012. A second generation of homogenized Canadian monthly surface air temperature for climate trend analysis. Journal of Geophysical Research, 117(D18).
Watmough M.D., Schmoll M.J. 2007. Environment Canada's prairie and Northern Region Habitat Monitoring Program Phase II: recent habitat trends in the prairie habitat joint venture. Canadian Wildlife Service, Edmonton, Alberta.
Watmough M.D., Li Z., Beck E.M. 2017. Prairie habitat monitoring program Canadian prairie wetland and upland status and trends 2001–2011 in the prairie habitat joint venture delivery area. Canadian Wildlife Service, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Williams C.J., Conrad D., Kothawala D.N., Baulch H.M. 2019. Selective removal of dissolved organic matter affects the production and speciation of disinfection byproducts. Science of The Total Environment, 652: 75–84.
Wolfe J.D., Shook K.R., Spence C., Whitfield C.J. 2019a. A watershed classification approach that looks beyond hydrology: application to a semi-arid, agricultural region in Canada. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 23(9): 3945–3967.
Wolfe J.D., Whitfield C.J., Shook K.R., Spence C. 2019b. Canadian prairie watershed classification.
Zeng T., Arnold W.A. 2013. Pesticide photolysis in prairie potholes: probing photosensitized processes. Environmental Science & Technology, 47(13): 6735–6745. American Chemical Society.
Zhang Z., Chen F., Barlage M., Bortolotti L.E., Famiglietti J., Li Z., et al. 2022. Cooling effects revealed by modeling of wetlands and land–atmosphere interactions. Water Resources Research, 58(3): e2021WR030573.
Zhang Z., Stadnyk T.A., Burn D.H. 2020. Identification of a preferred statistical distribution for at-site flood frequency analysis in Canada. Canadian Water Resources Journal/Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques, 45(1): 43–58.

Supplementary material

Supplementary Material 1 (DOCX / 35.5 KB).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image FACETS
FACETS
Volume 9January 2024
Pages: 1 - 15
Editor: Britt Dianne Hall

History

Received: 22 November 2023
Accepted: 15 February 2024
Version of record online: 20 June 2024

Notes

This paper is one of a collection entitled Canadian biogeoscience research in the food-water-energy nexus: advances from processes to modelling.

Data Availability Statement

Data generated and analyzed during this study are available from https://doi.org/10.20383/103.0650 (virtual watershed hydrological model simulations) or from the corresponding author upon request.

Key Words

  1. agriculture
  2. birds
  3. drainage
  4. environmental modelling
  5. landscape change
  6. water security

Sections

Subjects

Plain Language Summary

Draining wetland ponds for agriculture expected to have large impacts on prairie water resources

Authors

Affiliations

School of Environment and Sustainability, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Global Institute for Water Security, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft, and Writing – review & editing.
Colin Whitfield served as Guest Editor at the time of manuscript review and acceptance and did not handle peer review and editorial decisions regarding this manuscript.
Global Institute for Water Security, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, and Writing – review & editing.
School of Environment and Sustainability, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Global Institute for Water Security, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Supervision, and Writing – review & editing.
Environment and Climate Change Canada, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, and Writing – review & editing.
Environment and Climate Change Canada, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, and Writing – review & editing.
Centre for Hydrology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Author Contributions: Data curation, Methodology, Software, and Writing – review & editing.
Centre for Hydrology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Author Contributions: Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, and Writing – review & editing.
Centre for Hydrology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Author Contributions: Funding acquisition, Methodology, Supervision, and Writing – review & editing.
Global Institute for Water Security, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Author Contributions: Data curation, Methodology, and Writing – review & editing.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: CJW, EC, HMB, RGC, CS
Data curation: KRS, ZH, JDW
Formal analysis: CJW, EC, ZH
Funding acquisition: CJW, HMB, RGC, CS, JWP
Methodology: CJW, EC, HMB, RGC, CS, KRS, ZH, JWP, JDW
Project administration: CJW, CS
Software: KRS
Supervision: CJW, HMB, CS, JWP
Writing – original draft: CJW
Writing – review & editing: CJW, EC, HMB, RGC, CS, KRS, ZH, JWP, JDW

Competing Interests

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Funding Information

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Other Metrics

Citations

Cite As

Export Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

There are no citations for this item

View Options

View options

PDF

View PDF

Media

Media

Other

Tables

Share Options

Share

Share the article link

Share on social media