There has been a wealth of research documenting the impacts of wetland drainage in this region.
Baulch et al. (2021) recently synthesized this knowledge in an effort to characterize the magnitude of impacts and describe the confidence in these effects occurring. Our novel analysis builds on this knowledge, and is among the first to quantify changes to multiple ecosystem services when pothole wetlands are drained in the Canadian Prairie Pothole Region. Using the Pothole Till class as the focus of the modelling framework to provide regional context, our predictions indicate that the five ecosystem service indicators investigated were all strongly impacted by wetland drainage but that the magnitude of the impact varied. Importantly, there were notable changes immediately once drainage began for all of the ecosystem services investigated. Here we provide context for our results by exploring the role of wetland drainage with regard to regional water resources, habitat, and economics. We also provide an overview of the limitations of our approach as well as opportunities for further use of it.
Water resources
The study area spans parts of a region that suffers from numerous water security pressures (
Gober and Wheater 2014), and our results highlight the added risk to water resources coincident with wetland drainage. The hydrography of the Canadian prairie region is complex and highly disconnected. Wetland drainage will fundamentally alter the hydrological behaviour. As wetlands are drained, the connected area increases (
Spence et al. 2022b). With an increasing number of channels dug to remove water from the landscape, depressional water storage (e.g., in wetland ponds;
Fig. 2) is lost. We illustrate here important changes in return period flows resulting from an increasingly connected landscape with wetland drainage, and increasing the water yield from small watersheds will contribute to downstream flooding, as reported extensively in the media (e.g.,
CBC News 2014;
Saskatoon StarPhoenix 2015;
Simes 2023). Flooding may occur locally at the scales we have modelled, but at larger scales, the cumulative impact of draining numerous wetland basins across multiple watersheds is also an important consideration and one that warrants further investigation. Drainage of wetlands across many watersheds of the scale we modelled here is expected to have additive and potentially synergistic effects. Our modelling framework, however, is not suited to predicting the flooded areas resulting from wetland drainage, both because our models are virtual in nature and because hydraulic models are needed to capture riverine processes that the Cold Regions Hydrological Modelling Platform is not designed for. That said, our results imply that removing 50% of the wetland area results in the 1:41 year flood occurring more than four times as often (
Fig. 2b), with concomitant impacts on flooding costs.
Coincident with the increasing movement of surface water as wetlands are drained, is the increased likelihood that high nutrient export will occur when conditions are sufficiently wet. This is an important concern in this region with naturally nutrient-rich lakes and waterbodies (
Quinlan et al. 2002), with already substantive issues of harmful algal blooms. Edge-of-field total phosphorus export is highly variable, but seems to centre around ∼0.25 kg ha
−1 for Prairie sites (
Liu et al. 2021), which is higher than our watershed scale estimates herein, even under complete wetland loss (∼0.1 kg ha
−1). Estimates of nutrient runoff are sensitive to local runoff concentrations (our analysis uses median concentrations); hence, areas of higher (or lower) impact should be expected. Differences between edge-of-field and watershed-scale nutrient export estimates can also be attributed to more diverse land uses at the larger spatial scale considered in our analysis. The presence of grassland and shrubland areas where total phosphorus export may be lower than cropland, and other features, including wetlands with notable areal coverage at the watershed scale, can contribute to lower estimates. Ultimately, evidence of higher edge-of-field nutrient runoff estimates suggests our watershed scale estimates could be underestimated.
The magnitude of the increase in phosphorus export driven by wetland drainage, although uncertain, is clearly substantive. This increase is expected to have important ecological effects that can cascade through aquatic ecosystems. Algal blooms, while not a new phenomenon to the region, are increasingly topical and, in recent years, have disrupted drinking water treatment processes, leading to challenges in supplying major cities with adequate water supplies (
Williams et al. 2019). Our results indicate that nutrient (phosphorus) export is expected to increase with higher levels of wetland drainage in all but the driest years (when conditions are too dry for the landscape to become hydrologically connected); if half of the historical complement of wetlands is lost, P export is predicted to approximately double. These estimates, however, do not account for changing fertilizer inputs and other changes associated with the drainage and cultivation of wetlands; hence, the real magnitude of change is likely to be greater than shown herein. Downstream mobilization of phosphorus associated with wetland drainage is a critically important consideration in a region where the agricultural industry has a strong focus on beneficial management practices. Importantly, many of these practices have limited efficacy in this cold, snowmelt-dominated region (
Baulch et al. 2019). It remains unproven that any tools (beneficial management practices or otherwise), either alone or in concert, could be implemented in a way that can counteract what is anticipated to be a massive increase in nutrient delivery to lakes and other water bodies associated with the loss of wetlands from the landscape.
Habitat
There is a direct link between wetland drainage and loss of habitat. Our predictions highlight the loss of riparian areas, dabbling ducks, and wetland-associated birds with progressive loss of areas of ponded water, showing their high sensitivity to drainage (
Fig. 6). The analysis showed immediate and rapid loss of birds occurs as small wetland ponds are drained first, producing a pattern that begins to level off at moderate and high drainage levels when the wetland complex features only larger ponds, and very few of these organisms remain (
Fig. 5). When considering the requirements of dabbling ducks and other wetland-associated birds, small ponds support higher bird densities (
Bartzen et al. 2017), although wetland complexes composed of ponds of varying size and permanence are needed to meet the requirements of a diverse prairie waterbird community (e.g.,
Elliott et al. 2020). In our analysis, which removes wetlands in order of increasing size, the loss of water storage capacity in these small wetlands results in the remaining wetland ponds receiving more water. The hydrological behaviour of this system dictates that ponds that are present at higher drainage thresholds tend to be larger and deeper as more wetlands are drained, and consequently, they support lower densities of birds than prior to drainage, owing to strong and well-established relationships between pond size and bird abundances (
Bidwell et al. 2014). At these higher drainage levels, where remaining wetlands are larger and more lake-like, dramatic changes in species composition are also expected (e.g.,
Elliott et al. 2020).
Unlike our analyses for nutrients and water, the mobility of biota can lead to interactive effects with adjacent watersheds. While our models allow for the movement of birds with changing pond area dynamics, (limited) relocation to habitat in undrained adjacent watersheds is possible but would be biased toward species tolerant of reduced habitat heterogeneity and subject to limits imposed via competition for available resources. Our models did not include these spatial scale effects, or those that could become evident as an increasing number of wetland basins are drained and converted to cropland, lengthening distances between wetland ponds. As fewer wetlands are retained in the landscape, wetland ponds become more isolated, and local complexes of wetlands needed to attract and support some bird species may become disfunctional (
Fairbairn and Dinsmore 2001;
Naugle et al. 2001;
Blann et al. 2009). Wetland isolation might strongly affect species with relatively low mobility, such as amphibians (
Lehtinen et al. 1999;
Environment Canada 2012 [leopard frog];
Ruso et al. 2019). Importantly, these effects could accentuate biotic impacts and changes in community composition, especially at lower wetland retention levels.
Our focus here has been on dabbling ducks and wetland-associated birds, but it is important to acknowledge that riparian habitat loss at pond margins will have a profound impact on a wider range of biota. Wetland margins represent the only remaining natural upland cover in many intensively cropped landscapes, and can be important reservoirs for beneficial invertebrate populations, including predatory arthropods (
Robinson et al. 2021) and pollinators (
Vickruck et al. 2019). It is possible that margins lower contaminant exports from ponds via emerging aquatic insects (
Kraus et al. 2021), as riparian buffers serve to reduce agrochemical runoff to pond water (
Main et al. 2015). For agrochemical runoff reaching pothole ponds, these inundated areas also play an important role in enhancing the breakdown of pesticides via photolysis (
Zeng and Arnold 2013). Aquatic insects can provide highly nutritious foods for terrestrial species such as bats and birds using these riparian areas (
Hixson et al. 2015;
Twining et al. 2016). Species that rely strongly on wetland ponds, such as amphibians, will be seriously impacted by wetland riparian habitat loss, altered wetland function and quality, and greater wetland isolation as drainage progresses. Even large ungulates often select for wetland habitats in prairie landscapes for shelter, food, and water (e.g.,
LaForge et al. 2016), so the removal of wooded riparian areas could concentrate animals in less remaining habitat and eventually produce density-related reductions in survival and reproduction (
Bonenfant et al. 2009). Key resources associated with wetland ponds and adjacent riparian habitats may explain why some species can occur in intensively cropped agroecosystems (
Janke et al. 2019;
Nelson and Gillan 2020;
Berzins et al. 2022). The potential for broad impacts on wetland riparian habitat and the associated benefits these habitats can provide to the agroecosystem, in concert with changes to water resources, suggest the need for a more comprehensive understanding of the economic pressures around wetland pond drainage.
Economics
The major impetus for draining pothole wetlands is private benefit to the landowner. Depending on their size and location, wetland ponds can reduce field trafficability, increase the time required to seed, fertilize, and harvest, and lead to higher input costs where equipment size is not ideally suited. Draining wetlands reduces both field obstruction costs and the opportunity cost of non-productive land (
Cortus et al. 2011;
Lawley 2014). The profitability of cultivating drained wetlands in the Canadian PPR, however, is highly variable for individual wetlands and, in some cases, leads to financial losses (
Clare et al. 2021). In contrast, ecosystem services provided by pothole wetlands can be highly valuable (e.g.,
Dias and Belcher 2015;
Pattison-Williams et al. 2018), and the impacts associated with drainage, some of which have been quantified here, can be costly to society. Cropland expansion in the United States is associated with increasingly marginal yields, and costs to wildlife are high (
Lark et al. 2020). While there is inherent uncertainty around these costs and benefits (e.g.,
Hansen and Loesch 2017), a challenge also lies in there being a mismatch between those who bear the costs of wetland conservation and those who benefit (
Dias and Belcher 2015). This can contribute to enduring conflict (
Breen et al. 2018). While there are inherent uncertainties in quantifying and valuing ecosystem services, and these uncertainties can be an obstacle to assessing tradeoffs among land-use decisions (
Johnson et al. 2012), there nonetheless remains a strong need for further efforts to both quantify and use economic approaches to value pothole wetlands. The Canadian prairie region features a range of approaches to wetland management, from no net loss (of wetland area) (e.g., Manitoba) to widespread permitting of wetland drainage (e.g., Saskatchewan). Given the examples herein of the loss of ecosystem services when both small and large wetland ponds are lost, these approaches can be expected to contribute to the loss of ecosystem services, but in different ways. In some instances, e.g., Saskatchewan's forthcoming agricultural water stewardship policy, economic analyses of wetland drainage consider only private benefits to landowners. Thus, there remains a strong need to comprehensively value the direct and indirect costs of wetland loss to allow for those costs to society to be pragmatically weighed against the benefits of wetland drainage that currently accrue for private landowners pursuing this practice. This approach is needed to better inform and design wetland conservation policy measures. The costs of habitat restoration and species recovery are generally far more costly and difficult than protecting existing habitat. These costs and others, including the costs of flooding and efforts to reduce nutrient loading, are rarely considered in long-term economic assessments of wetland loss resulting from agricultural expansion.
Limitations and next steps
We focused herein on key biophysical ecosystem services, spanning provisioning (waterfowl), regulating (water storage, nutrient retention), and supporting (habitat) ecosystem services. These are among the biophysical services identified previously as being at risk of impact due to pothole wetland drainage (
Baulch et al. 2021). While we believe that this analysis effectively examines the potential severity of the loss of ecosystem services, it stops short of quantifying other services, for example, supporting services such as carbon storage, floral resources, or amphibian habitat that have been investigated for U.S. regions of the Prairie Pothole Region (
Mushet and Roth 2020). We have likewise not investigated the loss of cultural services here, including recreational experiences, and the significance of wetlands to Indigenous peoples (e.g.,
Clarkson et al. 2013;
Department of the Environment 2016). In contrast, drained wetlands are typically replaced with cropland, which can provide other ecosystem services; however, these are widespread on this landscape and would not add to the diversity of services provided. It can be inferred that there would be at best a close to one-to-one replacement with land used to grow plants for human or animal consumption, and we have not included this potential for ecosystem service switching in our analysis.
It is worth noting that our approach is one designed to typify the behaviour of a watershed class. This is advantageous in that it allows us to regionalize behaviour on a very local scale (e.g., 100 km
2 is the scale of a few large farms). The tradeoff, however, is that this approach does not capture very well the potential range in loss of ecosystem services with wetland drainage for a particular watershed class. For example, we could expect that within the Pothole Till class, for (real) watersheds with an areal wetland coverage higher than that modelled here, we would see greater absolute loss of ecosystem services (e.g., water storage, total phosphorus export, bird abundance) with each additional level of drainage. The converse would be true of locations with a somewhat lower proportion of wetlands naturally present on the landscape than modelled here. Further, while we limit our analysis to a single representative climate station for the Pothole Till class, the analysis is deliberate in its use of the highest quality climate record available, which, at a length of more than 40 years, captures much of the most extreme variability observed to date. Given the inherent interannual variability in this region, which alternates between multi-year wet and dry phases, analysis of this length of record allows us to capture the dynamic behaviour of multiple wet and dry phases, including the most severe drought on record. We caution that, given the climatic variability within the region, this analysis should not be expected to illustrate the full range in watershed response to drainage for this class. The behaviour illustrated (e.g.,
Figs. 2 and
3) could be expected to shift somewhat should the analysis be repeated using a drier or wetter climate station lying closer to the periphery of the Pothole Till watershed class (e.g., to lower or high ranges, respectively). Nonetheless, given strong natural temporal variability from wet, well-connected conditions to dry conditions with limited runoff generation at local scales, the interannual variability shown here is likely to capture much of the spatial variability associated with the region. As such, these data should not be used to provide local scale assessments, but instead are expected to provide a robust representation of change at large spatial scales. We also rely on several assumptions in our analysis, most notably that ponds are round, to estimate riparian areas. While this will not be strictly true, it was a suitable simplification to approximate these relationships. We also acknowledge that our predictions are associated with the strength of the underlying hydrological modelling.
He et al. (2023) explore this for the virtual-watershed hydrological modelling in some detail, illustrating that the modelling framework is robust. Given the importance of the hydrological behaviour of this landscape to the characterization of ecosystem services, we believe our approach, featuring robust hydrological representation, provides a strong underpinning to our work. Our focus on strong hydrological representation confers advantages over other off-the-shelf approaches that do not capture water storage and potential changes in water movement associated with the loss of wetlands and do not capture the dynamic interannual behaviour of wetlands.
In future work, our analysis could be extended to larger scale ecological models that can account for potential indirect effects. This could include, for example, the impact on ecosystems in other regions that could see fewer migrating birds as wetlands are drained. Given the large magnitude of impacts quantified through this analysis, extending this work to consider the economic value of the loss of ecosystem services should be pursued. This might include quantifying the potential for indirect economic impacts, e.g., tourism associated with duck hunting, as one example. While we have not quantified changes to carbon storage here, loss of carbon with wetland drainage is expected, given that cultivated wetland depressions have much lower carbon stores than uncultivated ones (
Bedard-Haughn et al. 2006); however, the magnitude of impacts to greenhouse gas budgets for these systems has not yet been described with certainty (
Baulch et al. 2021). Improved estimates of the impact on carbon storage and net climate forcing as pothole ponds are drained and converted to agriculture warrant a fuller investigation. With rising interest in maintaining natural carbon sequestration capacity, future assessments of the loss of ecosystem services using this framework should be expanded to include this aspect. We also acknowledge that our approach to nutrient export modelling is based on evidence of chemostatic phosphorus behaviour in the region and does not include explicit process representation. While available evidence suggests that water volume is the key control on phosphorus export, given evidence of higher edge-of-field total phosphorus export than reported herein at the watershed scale, further examination of how the role of wetland density, their connectivity, and water residence times in individual wetlands can affect nutrient retention in these systems should be considered in future work. Similarly, further work to understand and simulate drivers of localized variation in runoff chemistry will help refine our understanding of downstream impacts on aquatic ecosystems.
Finally, as a region undergoing strong climate change, our modelled response to wetland drainage for a period spanning the last half of the twentieth century may not reflect the consequences of wetland drainage under warmer and perhaps wetter or drier conditions. Wetland-driven evapotranspiration contributes to moisture recirculation and several degrees of cooling in wetland-rich areas (e.g.,
Zhang et al. 2022), with the potential that loss of these features can exacerbate hot and dry conditions and further raise water use demand (e.g., through irrigation). These interactions are important, as predictions of the change in bird abundance associated with pond conditions in different parts of the Prairie Pothole Region under future climate have suggested both decreases (e.g.,
Sorenson et al. 1998) and increases (
McIntyre et al. 2019) are possible. Examining how wetland drainage can be expected to affect ecosystem services under future climate conditions in the region should be considered in future analyses. In this regard, we see a need to extend this analysis from the Pothole Till to other watershed classes that exhibit a range in wetland coverage (
Wolfe et al. 2019a), hydrological behaviours, and sensitivity to climate (
He et al. 2023).